Is this the most visually impressive movie ever, relative to it's time period?
>>66924871
Movie? I hope you meant Kino.
That's not sharknado
Yes___
>>66924871
> relative to it's time period
It made other space movies look quite antiquated. Realism was injected into conjecture. Also boredom.
>>66924871
Hey! Its Frank Poole in his yellow spacesuit.
>>66924871
The moon landing was also pretty good, also by Kubrick
Any of Zack Snyder's films
Alien
>>66925417
don't know if you're being silly but I really liked watchmen and thought it looked pretty
>>66926526
Nothing to be impressed by for the date it was released though.
I would add bladerunner purely for its visual style, not a movie before or since has managed to get that cyberpunk look done properly.
this was a shit flick in my honest opinion my family member.
The sequel starring Armstrong was better.
Post literally ONE impressive shot from 2001 thats not DUDE SYMMETRY LMAO like OP pic, and explain why is it impressive. Cause any retard can place things in dead center and appeal to basic human attration towards things that have clear patterns.
>>66926853
Yet not a single capeshit movie manages to do this "simple" thing.
Apropos, atrocious use of the English language there friendo.
>>66926942
>b-but capeshit
You still haven't posted a still. I mean, 2001 is the most amazing visual film ever, right? Should be simple, right? Every fucking frame would be a painting, right?
>>66927003
Indeed.
>>66926853
>>66927003
Spotted the retard
>>66926853
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3oHmVhviO8&hd=1 I think this scene´s use of models and camerawork are good examples why it deserves praise it gets. Still, imo it is not perfect movie by any means but visuals really are amazing for its age.
>it's a framing episode
it is interesting to compare and contrast kubrick and ridley scott in this area though, one has a weird autistic fixation bordering dependence even in other movies where it's a little less obvious, the other has a virtual abandonment of most conventional ideas of it for better or for worse and at times seems incapable of even understanding it, almost like he uses it occasionally by accident or necessity and at other times doesn't at all when it would be more appropriate and instead opts for these "punchless chunks" as one anon eloquently stated a few days ago.
they're both visual storytellers who at times had issues blending script and screen, but at others elevated the material, they're responsible for 2 of and possibly the 2 best sci-fi movies of all time (don't start, there are half a dozen others i can see in the convoy though), beautiful for their own reasons, some shared/similar themes yet so oddly different, both in style and a good portion of substance..
>>66926853
not really symetry, monolith is seen from a perspective in wich, the left face we see is closing to the rocks, wich arent far away, and the other "face" is opening to the clouds. i dont know if that thing to the right is an ape, but if thats the case, its a cool perspective. stop ranting
>>66927842
gonna be posting scenes from the moon monolith, and sorry in advance for the shit resolution
>>66927927
>>66927955
>>66927003
was that enough to shut you up?
avatar unironically
it got good reviews off that alone, watching that in imax was quite an experience
>>66927188
>spinny toys spins for 3 minutes
Amazing
>>66927842
Interesting. Could be passable, if only I wasn't busy laughing at men dressed as monkeys
>>66927927
What am I supposed to be seeing here?
>>66927955
All that people tells me is that painting looks like shit and Kubrick was the pioneer to annoy people with blue+orange
>>66927981
More shots of nothing. Wow, they have a black block behind, already setting as my wallpaper
Remember people, don't feed the troll.
>>66925390
i heard he did 9/11
>>66924871
crap floating in space
