>romance in Star Wars
Why, George?
no clue
>George probably thought the prequels would be his magnum opus
>>66853304
>Why, George?
Because Luke and Leia had to come from somewhere, there was also romance in the OT
Appeal to the female audience
>>66853400
>hopefully it works
>>66853424
genius
>>66853304
But leia and Han romance was great... Well, in ESB it was. There's no reason to think it couldn't have worked again, possibly better
>>66853468
>romance
Well it was more of an adventure fling thing
Prequel romance was... a little different. And the autism didnt help
>>66853409
Well, the romance in the OT was subtle, the actors had chemistry.
In the PT it kinda happens and we're supposed to believe Padme loved the child killer.
>>66853503
>an adventure fling thing
What do you mean?
>sexuality in star wars
why, faggot jews and sjw panderers
>>66853400
>implying they are not
they're closing in on 20 years old and the only thing to have come close to the scale of his prequel trilogy is lotr, another trilogy that's almost just as old. and what do you know peter jackson credits lucas for making it possible.
>>66853619
>implying they are not
I'm not implying that, I'm stating it outright.
>>66853535
Like adventure/action romances
I.e. james bond, speed, demolition man, etc etc
>>66853572
>>66853944
It wasn't anything like those.
>>66853304
That wasn't romance. Leia and Han was romance, Annie and Padme was a badly programmed automaton trying to understand human interactions by seducing a crazy woman.
>>66855456
Like a poorly scripted episode of Star Trek TNG.
>>66855456
It is not often you see a /tv/ poster figure out a film's story by accident.
>>66854478
>It wasnt
It basically was, romance forged in high paced adrenaline adventure
Nothing in common other than having lived through a dangerous encounter
