>>66785633
hopefully never...no such thing as a faithful adaption.
>moorcock
>moor
>cock
>>66785659
Heck I could make a faithful adaption of it, it's not that hard.
>>66785633
Literally who?
>>66786055
Not knowing Micheal Moorcock, I take it you don't read books or are quite young.
>>66785633
meh, I'd rather see an elric adaptation
>>66786086
>2016
>reading books
>>66786086
>genre fiction
No, see, it's you who doesn't read books here.
>>66786109
Me too, don't see it happening ever though. I mean it wouldn't cost that much unless Stormbringer was being adapted first. Hell I could film a low budget version of it myself here in Ireland.
>>66786126
Implying that's the only thing I read, nice try though.
>>66786126
>ooh lookit me I read autobiographies
bruh that's what the history channel is for
>>66786126
Probs only ever read 'young adult' junior fiction.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0SS7j1WYM7x
>>66786146
>reading genre fiction at all
>reading fantasy at all
>YEAH I EAT SHIT, SO WHAT? I ALSO EAT THINGS THAT AREN'T SHIT SOMETIMES! NICE TRY!
Whether manchild or literal child, you're the literary equivalent of someone who's very serious about capeshit.
>>66786177
>projecting your manchild taste on other people
>"Moorcock"
>>66786256
Sounds like your mad about something, I just can't tell what.
>>66786256
Projecting your retardation on normally cognitive humans.
>>66785633
Chap is a great idea man, but a terrible writer.
>>66786318
Hit and miss but the exection sometimes is really stupid, like in The Rituals of Infinity the main character is apparently "zany" because he sings a song before going through the space tunnel and walks into the desert naked and pulls a guy from another alternate earth to talk to him.
>>66786303
>u maaaaad
Literal child it is, then.
>>66786308
>so offended his fedora taste was called out he tries to copy a word someone more intelligent used but doesn't understand what it means so he uses it incorrectly
You shouldn't be on the internet unsupervised, buddy. Log off and have your helper pick out a paperback story for you.
>>66786405
Implying.
>>66786405
seriously bruh, why are you so invested in the literary tastes of some random stranger?
