Is it worth a watch if you don't really care about muh lesbians and muh back in the day?
>>66750623
Nope. Not worth it.
you just described the entire movie
Yes but if you're stupid enough to believe /tv/'s opinion a movie like this then you're probably as stupid as /tv/ and will hate it.
Is the cinematography worth watching it for?
>>66750623
Cinematography wise is pretty good, but the plot and the theme is terribly handled.
Blue is a warmest color is a better film about lesbian oppression and homophobia.
>>66750623
No.
>>66750704
>>66750771
Yes, it is.
>>66750701
Why would /tv/'s opinion on this movie be stupid?
/tv/ liked Brokeback Mountain, so I doubt /tv/ would automatically hate it because of homophobia.
It's actually really good
it's overrated crap.
Cate Blanchett is a great actress but there's just something about her I find disagreeable.
no, other than the lesbian scene there is nothing interesting
>>66750704
No.
>>66750803
>/tv/ liked Brokeback Mountain, so I doubt /tv/ would automatically hate it because of homophobia.
That was over a decade ago. This is a completely different board now with the /pol/ and reddit flood and incompetent mods.
>>66750623
>Is it worth a watch if you don't really care about muh lesbians and muh back in the day?
No. There ain't nothing about either of those two themes being commented on in Carol.
Just so you know the people answering in this thread are 50/50 (A) didn't see it and barely know what it is outside of MUH DEGENERACY and (B) downloaded the screener to feel more LE PATRIC and watched the first half hour of it while shitposting on /tv/ before turning it off because "it was boring."
>>66750623
>Is it worth a watch if you don't really care about muh lesbians and muh back in the day
not really.
>>66750704
If you care about it, yes, because it's great.
>>66750623
dude, i love mature vs teen lesbian porns. this is perfect for me
>>66751019
lol you think watching anything that isn't at least 10 years old could ever be patric hohohohoho
>>66750917
>No. There ain't nothing about either of those two themes being commented on in Carol.
Lol. are you kidding?
>>66750623
Not really. It's a snoozefest.
>Is it worth a watch if you don't really care about muh lesbians
It''s just a love story, not about lesbianism as something separate from other kinds of romance. But I don't know why you'd bother if this is the mentality you have.
>>66751339
No. You watch "Far From Heaven" and you will understand what I mean. Carol doesn't explore much of the world of its time and it doesn't give us much about homosexual love. I genuinely have no idea why I should think they are in love at all. It just seems some old gal having time to shag up with a confused younger one.
>>66750623
It's really well filmed
>>66751743
>. I genuinely have no idea why I should think they are in love at all. It just seems some old gal having time to shag up with a confused younger one.
I agree with that.
>Carol doesn't explore much of the world of its time and it doesn't give us much about homosexual love.
But she loses her daughter custody just for being a lesbian dude
>>66751864
>But she loses her daughter custody just for being a lesbian dude
It's not much of a social matter as much as it is the matter of dealing with a former lover for Carol. I reckon the way it was handled it could happen today still. Just ask yourself how you would deal with this if you had a kid together?
>>66752031
>It's not much of a social matter
It was a social matter, they had laws against lesbianism in the 50s
>>66751864
>she loses her daughter custody just for being a lesbian
No she lost it for being an unfaithful adulterer. A repeatedly unfaithful adulterer.
>>66750771
Except the movie isn't really about lesbian oppression and homophobia.
>>66750771
>lesbian oppression and homophobia
But these barely come up in La vie d'Adele--there's like one inconsequential throwaway scene about homophobia.
>>66750893
lets stop pretending you've been here for over a year, newfag.
>>66750623
>watching a movie with 2 female leads that isn't Mulholland Drive
rofl
>>66752997
Or Thelma and Lousie.
>>66752997
Mulholland Dr. is a piece of shit.
The individual performances were good, and the cinematography was great (or close to it). But the script was just plain bad.
>>66753246
Or Persona
>>66752909
Stop saying that the film was about one mature woman and one young woman falling in love, the romance in the fil was totally underdeveloped. The whole romance was an excuse to portray another film about social prejudices,
