Letterboxd thread
Post profiles, discuss recently watched films, whine about the year in review
http://letterboxd.com/2015/
>>65036315
>you will never have an immortal slav-fu
https://letterboxd.com/CoryBurning/
btw The Devils was dope
![hdc-blade2-1080.mkv_snapshot_00.03.25_[2016.01.14_15.52.18].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/NUA81hs.jpg "hdc-blade2-1080.mkv_snapshot_00.03.25_[2016.01.14_15.52.18].jpg")
http://letterboxd.com/BSC/
Bridge of Spies next I guess.
>>65037783
why was blade so good?
>>65038827
Because it was made by a director that has had hard on for monsters/creatures since he was a child?
At least Blade II was.
I have III sitting on my PC, I remember it being hilarious.
>>65038995
>wild grass
>not 5/5
p l e b
>>65038995
tfw still haven't seen lawrence of arabia
The 4k blu-ray is so fucking cheap too
what does having 4000 movies in your watchlist accomplish?
>>65039378
never run out of things to watch
>>65039183
Mastered in 4K
still 1080p pls understand
http://letterboxd.com/creamy/
Patricians Only
>>65036315
Do Acid feel like Jep from The Great Beauty acting like a know-it-all making witty commentary in his long reviews? that's why that was his las logged film?
>>65041171
good taste
http://letterboxd.com/redwell/
We Need To Talk About Kevin got panned hard by Slant and ReverseShot. I liked it.
>>65042146
how's being 16 treating you
>>65041342
>>65042291
Jesus Christ
>>65042291
pathetic
>>65042146
How is it possible for someone's favorite actress to be Marianne Custard? I mean she's hot but not even that hot.
can't do shit about the image size. sorry.
>>65042664
gay
http://letterboxd.com/Phantasmagorie/
Give me recommendations
hello I hope you're having a nice day, with lots of memes
>>65042820
five-star ratings include some meme shit called "eulogy for a big guy". i recommend you off yourself.
>>65042895
I legitimately enjoyed that film just as much as I enjoyed my other 5 star rated films, I don't see the issue.
Alright
>>65042895
>he hasn't seen requiem for a big guy
laughingsluts.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVkv3F3tfsY
just watched my 50th film of 2016
>>65043058
How many features?
>>65042992
>http://letterboxd.com/Phantasmagorie/
nice. Kieslowski is fucking great. downloaded The New World a couple days ago, guess I better watch it soon.
>>65043021
I have not, nor do I intend to ever do.
>>65043058
Just benched with 60kg dumbells
https://rateyourmusic.com/~straubien
>tfw there will NEVER EVER EVER EVER be a lettercuck user that is 1/10th as patrician as straubien
>>65043145
Yeah, kid's ok, nice numbers and exploring, but I'm better t.b.h.
>>65043145
>weeb
stay on rym trash
![Bridge.of.Spies.2015.1080p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS.mkv_snapshot_01.29.20_[2016.01.18_23.49.20].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/EpzdjcV.jpg "Bridge.of.Spies.2015.1080p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS.mkv_snapshot_01.29.20_[2016.01.18_23.49.20].jpg")
Have I taken too much viagre or
WHY IS THIS MOVIE SO FUCKING BLUE
>>65043266
>weeb
how did you come to that conclusion?
http://letterboxd.com/lozjudai/
Watched kung fury and it was kinda bad. Next I'm going to watch shitty movies and maybe some Lynch short films.So recommend me some entry level short films
>>65043314
seul le cinematographe consists of c tier Japanese cinema, wasn't hard. Weeb's are usually delusional (a trait you have definitely proved to be in possession of) so I wont be wasting further energy on your posts.
>>65043145
>using art as a means to cultivate personal image
>>65043389
>ozu and mizoguchi are c-tier
you just went full letterpleb
>>65043389
>Weeb's
>'s
Just kill yourself you retarded shitskin
>>65043145
>30 years old
I got this guy beat. Literally 10 years to surpass him.
http://letterboxd.com/Synt/
What do I watch tonight? Room 666 by Wim Wenders or Easy Riders, Raging Bulls by Kenneth Bowser?
>>65043604
Only about 2% of people itt will continue to have a vested interest in film in 10 years
>>65043801
I wonder if I'll make it? Should I? Right now I'm very invested and not seeing perspectives of a strong life change.
http://letterboxd.com/alphapapa/
:^)
>>65041171
P
L
E
B
>>65044345
fuck the papa
>>65044120
if it does happen it won't be a conscious change. you'll just find better / more important things to do with your time and gradually watch less and less films. so don't sweat it.
>>65043801
that's less than one person
![00001.mpls_snapshot_00.48.53_[2016.01.19_00.23.44].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Uk1frXF.jpg "00001.mpls_snapshot_00.48.53_[2016.01.19_00.23.44].jpg")
>>65044489
Pretty much this. Only reason I watch films is because I'm depressed or have nothing to do.
I see people who are genuinely interested keeping this up, people who want to be actors, directors, work in the industry, but I'm highly skeptical of anyone else.
Gonna watch Inside Llewyn Davis tonight, and likely something else.
>>65043145
>his only perfect rating is to Moses und fucking Aaron
top lol
proof that you can spend years munching arthouse and continue being an ignorant peasant
>>65041171
embodiment of yikes
What did ze mean by this lads?
http://letterboxd.com/unawarewolf/film/jeanne-dielman-23-quai-du-commerce-1080-bruxelles/
![pF9Xssd[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/OEZKR8d.jpg "pF9Xssd[1].jpg")
rate my ratings
>kill bill only up there because I re-rated them all
>>65045451
>Sicario - 4/5
Disgusting.
![Bridge.of.Spies.2015.1080p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS.mkv_snapshot_01.50.52_[2016.01.19_00.17.22].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/99GzUuh.jpg "Bridge.of.Spies.2015.1080p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS.mkv_snapshot_01.50.52_[2016.01.19_00.17.22].jpg")
Wat's up with Spielberg and this overwhelming white lightning every where
>its a night time scene
>imagine there will be no fucking annoying overwhelming white light this time
>He makes the snow work as such
ree desu
>>65045422
tl;dr
>>65045451
Trying way too hard to be cool.
>>65045519
he's always done that
>>65045527
tl;dr: the day-to-day maintenance operations of and for the patriarchal state are performed almost entirely by women.
>>65045588
Yeah I know it's his style, but I noticed it in Minority Report especially.
>>65045662
oof
>>65045493
13 Hours is objectively better than Sicario
![Bridge.of.Spies.2015.1080p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS.mkv_snapshot_01.37.30_[2016.01.19_00.02.25].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dBqdZGw.jpg "Bridge.of.Spies.2015.1080p.BluRay.x264-SPARKS.mkv_snapshot_01.37.30_[2016.01.19_00.02.25].jpg")
B R A V O
R
A
V
O
>>65036315
Why is this allowed?
What did he mean by this?
http://letterboxd.com/glazomaniac/film/the-danish-girl/ holy jesus batman
>>65046180
dude is fucking annoying
>>65046213
ctrl-f "cis"
>38 matches found
>>65046180
YIKES
Malick is great, and KoC is another unique film, but this lad is simply embarrassing. But he's right, this is the way to get reviews featured on lettershit.
Best film about making films? Bear in mind that 8 1/2 is the most pleb answer you can give.
>>65046297
close-up
>>65046297
Don't post your shit opinions in my thread anymore.
To my cisgender friends, I ask that, even if you would not normally do so, you please read this. This film was made for cisgender people, so I feel it important that I write this for cisgender people. I would not normally watch this movie, but it has been a subject of some discussion on this site in a way that has compelled me to watch it in order to discuss it credibly. I do not imagine what I have to say will be definitive or particularly more substantial than what other trans folks have said, but I have a voice here that some listen to, even if only briefly. I might as well take advantage of that. I know that many of you prefer not to read things about films you haven't seen, so let me say the important things first:
1. Do not watch this film. It is not merely bad, but harmful.
2. If you discuss the film, refer to Lili only as Lili and she/her.
>>65046278
baed LaPlante does it yet AGAIN
>>65046213
This triggers me
>>65046325
Nice, I like Kiarostami but always missed that one, will check it out
>>65046379
Why exactly is this lunatic tranny popular?
>>65046339
Kek, aren't you missing Film Studies 101 right now?
>>65046297
Le mépris
>>65046213
>>65046213
>A trans woman is a female, a woman. A trans man is a male, a man.
I wasn't able to go further, I'm sorry lad.
>>65046442
This might help you understand. The whole site is an sjw enclave now. The good guys lost.
>>65046297
popular = pleb?
>>65046278
>people hated it because they don't realize it's a "tone poem" and Malick is expanding the artform!!
Thanks Eli! We hated it because 1) the execution was lackluster, 2) it wasn't a very good film, and because 3) it's a diluted mishmash of everything else Malick has done, he's a one trick pony and you're a presumptuous effeminate dope
>>65046570
>inb4 someone posts the "lgbtpqa users" rym list
>>65046522
It's funny - I watched it and enjoyed it a lot more than I thought I would but was disappointed by the actual lack of film making going on in it - like I understand that there's the whole Fritz Lang storyline but it was mostly focuses on the writer's dissolving marriage.
I'm looking for films actually based on the act of making a film. But thanks for the suggestion, it's a great film.
>>65046297ed wood
>>65046442
Because unfettered leftism spirals into an unending signaling game in which everyone competes to signal who is the most tolerant, and the later stages result in a bunch of effete pajama boys fellating a mentally diseased tranny online
>>65046630
Well yeah kinda. Like it's probably the most well known film about making a film out there and it's a breeding ground for first time cinephiles.
>>65046640
think you meant to reply to this
>>65046180
>>65046640
did he really say a tone poem in 2016 is pushing the art forward?
this came out 87 years ago ffs
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PtCFxW4ge7A
Smh
>>65046843
Whoops I did indeed
>>65046180
>>65046223
>>65046288
I really hope Cinemos doesn't enable redditors to do their pandering/attention whoring shit in their reviews.
>>65046640
Trying to tell Malickfags their pretentious director is borderline trash is like talking to a wall.
b-b-but you don't get Malick's simplistic messages or in your face directing is their rebuttal every time. they think they're watching something deep and complex.
>>65046694
>>65046760
Living in Oblivion
>>65046947
What's your account? Please post unless you are ashamed of/do not support your own opinions.
![Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.2014.1080p.BluRay.REMUX.AVC.DTS-HD.MA.7.1-RARBG.mkv_snapshot_00.46.07_[2016.01.16_22.13.17].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GUxTH2a.jpg "Guardians.of.the.Galaxy.2014.1080p.BluRay.REMUX.AVC.DTS-HD.MA.7.1-RARBG.mkv_snapshot_00.46.07_[2016.01.16_22.13.17].jpg")
>>65047027
>>65037783
>>65046947
You're correct but don't get me wrong; the only Malick I actively dislike is ToL because I can't stand his weird Kierkegaard fixation and also due to diminishing returns. He makes the same movie over and over again with different actors in a different place
For what it's worth I enjoyed TRL, Days of Heaven, and TTW. I remember thinking New World was okay on first watch but I suspect that would change on a rewatch. Outside of the HELLA FUCKING EPIC director cameo In pretty indifferent to Badlands, and ToL is torture to sit through
>>65047144
I started to retroactively dislike new Malick after I saw ToL. It's weird, I haven't been able to enjoy the Thin Red Line anymore after watching ToL.
>>65047096
I just find it weird that you can say with confidence that something like Knight of Cups isn't deep or complex.
Are you really so sure you fully understand Malick's intentions? The stuff that's in there is just there for no reason? How can you say that?
I don't 'get' it, I don't personally think it is deep or complex, but I don't consider myself able to write it off completely, do you think you have some kind of deeper level of cinematic understanding that allows you to confidently say what does and does not have deeper meaning?
>>65047360
fuck that guy too
>>65047014
Aw yeah, already seen it, thought it was pretty decent
>>65046570
>>65046442
>tranny phobia
>in the current year of 2015
happy MLK day to you too
>>65046640
>>65046947
>>65047144
>>65047235
How cute anti-Malick posters are! They are somehow convinced of possessing taste while rejecting his poetic and heartfelt cinema. I'll save myself for a proper Malick thread, so this time you're gonna be able to save yourselves the embarrassment of another exposing of your fake sensibilities and general cinematic illiteracy.
>>65047491
>le nigger Gandhi day
Americans are some lazy cunts
>>65047564
>Poetic
you mean parody?
>>65047638
well now don't you sound like a peach
>>65047676
back to fucking reddit
>>65047694
I'm on reddit right now?
Thoughts?
http://letterboxd.com/blueberrymoth/film/laurence-anyways/
>find a cool reviewer
>follow
>check the picture
>looks like a girl but something is off
>check twitter
>he's a trannyfag
>unfollow
>>65047757
Laurence Anyways is a shit movie not because of the tranny theme but because of how it was shot.
Dolan tried to imitate the worst of Kubrick
>>65047757
I'm afraid these people don't realize they're living life as satire.
>>65047337
Not that anon but I felt like I had a pretty good grasp of what Malick was doing in KoC, there even seemed to be an India Song vibe to it. I didn't hate it the film, I just felt it could have been executed better and there's still the point that he keeps making variations of the same theme. If he had made KoC three or four films ago I might have really enjoyed it
>peasants bash Terry for being "repetitive and gimmicky"
>praise people like Bergman or Ozu who essentially made the same movie dozens of times because they're safe, canonical picks
>>65047438
You can find some gems in here
http://letterboxd.com/pileofcrowns/list/documentaries-about-movies-open/
>>65047778
lol, who was it?
>>65047360
>le millennial Buzzfeed Twitter joke
>353 likes
The film community is dead
>>65047864
I don't remember the name, someone with red hair
>>65047491
Your calendar is numbered.
The Day of the Rope is nigh!
>>65047778
>find a cool reviewer
>meme a bit with my username, nothing 'truly' offending
>he blocks me out of hundreds he has
lol
>>65046379
>>65047564
UNLEASH THE POETRY
>>65036315
I meant to ask this
Is letterboxd a good tracker for tracking movies and series you want to watch and have watched already
A really important feature i find missing from imdb is how it only suggests movies based on what you HAVEN'T seen, as opposed to movies you have seen. You're forced to make a second list of have seen movies, a third for series and a fourth for series you have watched.
Another thing I'd really like to see is the ability to note down which episode(s) i have seen on a series in case i come back to it at a later time
does letterboxd do that?
>>65047974
>it's a "Day of the Rope" guy post
your obsession with social cleansing is pretty freaky. You should probably work on being a normal person. Your family may suspect you're the next Charles Manson.
>>65048000
>>65048042
Good god
>>65048094
trakt.tv maybe?
Should I watch Vivre sa vie or Tenebrae next?
>>65048164
The best :)
>>65046213
Over/under is 400 likes by this time next week.
Place your bets gentlemen.
>>65047903
Malick is safe and canonical as well, and there are Bergman and Ozu films I dislike. I even detailed 3 Malick films I enjoyed, if you think anyone here is picking on Terry you need to cool your jets Tonto
>>65047360
>Leonard DiCaprio
>Starbuck
>>65048164
go for the giallo, i don't like to waste my time with godard tbqh
>>65047360
Why is it OK to be racist against whites in Letterboxd?
In nigger racism
>If Leo doesn't win the Oscar, I will be more done than a nigga that skipped day off the field work.
?!?!?
>>65046213
this is longer than my college thesis (and to be honest probably better researched lol)
>>65047863
cheers, will check it out
se a vida e, i love you!!
>>65046213
Don't these retards realize they have highly developed narcissistic disorder?
>>65041501
Why he deleted all his shit?
>>65041501
Why he deleted all his shit reviews?
>>65048765
He went to RYM but he doesn't review or take part in any forum or comment box activity.
>>65048765
Because Letterboxd is a sinking ship and the smart ones got off first
>>65048856
>smart ones
>>65049098
>implying messing with no-talents on Letterboxd isn't a hilarious pastime
>defending James Healey
>>65049183
hi cuckcid
>>65049098
Based acid telling it like it is
>>65049568
You keep using that word but you don't know what it means guy
>>65049183
>>65049743
yikes
Lads, I...
>>65049183
>>65049786
So, do you feel like Jep Gambardella? I bet you do
Recommend me vulgar masterpieces
>>65049938
Belezza Man? Not particularly, it's just a film I like a lot and he was a compelling character. Speaking of which, Youth was a disaster and Sorrentino should have stopped while he was ahead
>>65046278
savage
>>65049964
>>65050326
i'm trusting you anon
http://letterboxd.com/Smoothhands/
>>65050790
Y I K E S
I
K
E
S
https://letterboxd.com/Phallixander/
Hateful Eight sucked
>>65050911
nah it didn't
How's my movie taste?
https://letterboxd.com/CianLangan/
>>65051158
Irrelevant becausse you gave Shitcario fucking 4 and half stars
>>65050992
It's literally babby's first Agatha Christie. Sally Menke's editing really was QT's saving grace and ever since her death he's been getting more and more indulgent and intolerable which is a shame because a good number of his films are great.
>>65051158
Whiplash is not that good anon but it really looks like you're working on it and trying new things, so, carry on
>>65051158
>Inglourious basterds as one of your favorite flick
>whiplash as well, while it was alright but forgettable
>4.5 stars for Sicario
Please tell me you started watching films 3 months ago, otherwise kill yourself.
>>65050824
rude
>>65051158
I recommend following some of the people in this thread bud - not even joking, that's the best way to expand taste.
>>65051343
>>65051188
Why do you all hate Sicario so much?
>>65051188
>because it was great anon
You think you'll lose any followers for calling trannies degenerates?
>>65051595
heavy-handed messages, lack of interesting protagonists, the list goes on
>>65052143
I'm not even greek :)
>>65046570
Who were the "good guys"?
>>65052159
How wasn't Alejandro an interesting protagonist?
>>65052182
good point
>>65047564
Nothing offends like bad taste! And you are the perfect example!
>>65052411
Because his character build up is referential at best and supposed to be taken for granted.
Because he is basically cawadoody protagonist one man army with edgy lines and GRR so broody attitude.
Kate could've been interesting but writers make her inconsistent, barely flinches at explosion and kill house, flinches when someone shoots a person in firefight in the border, is way too fucking dumb and naive for someone who has dealt with extreme crime
Groaning.
Sick usernames guys
Loved reading each of your blogs
I tip my hat to you reddit
You made this nice little pocket of cancer right in the heart of /tv/
God bless you
Hahaha just kidding kill yourselves
Tab closed ;^)
top 3 imbeciles on Letterboxd:
http://letterboxd.com/elihayes/
http://letterboxd.com/diplo_mat/
http://letterboxd.com/josiahmorgan11/
>>65052739
you forgot your profile
CINEMOS > REDDITUMBLRBOXD
>>65052760
lol, I hit a spot there. Which one of them are you?
>>65053470
Fucking bitch faggot, I'll hit your spot soon if you don't shut up
>>65053654
my guess is you are either Ned Ryerson or Josiah Morgan. Fucking turbo plebs, I wish the block feature actually made users invisible.
>>65052820
cinemos doesn't exist yet. stop shilling until its out
>2015
>Not maining Keaton
while we're young annoyed the shit out of me. worse than greenberg.
un homme qui dort might be the best film i have ever seen. not usually hyperbolic and very stingy with my 5 star ratings.
>>65054600
kek mine was Chaplin
Rate my faves bros
>>65055823
Too obvious.
>>65055823
At least you don't think Malick is "pushing the boundaries of cinema." Or do you?
>>65055823
>15 years old
>>65055823
all these are either good or okay movies
you have good taste compared to the average capeshitter
don't let the avant teens on this thread tell you otherwise
https://letterboxd.com/alessandro74/
I'm still mad that /tv/ tricked me into watching Bone Tomahawk.
>>65045451
>Revenant 3 1/2
>The Martian 4
>Hateful Eight 4 1/2
triggered.gif
>>65057010
Being both in the same genre, why would you say The Homesman is better than Bone Tomahawk? I haven't watched any of them, btw.
>>65057285
>same genre
Absolutely not. The Homesman is a very dramatic film while Bone Tomahawk is like Zombieland with no comedy and less zombies.
>>65054600
where is this
>>65045451
>rating kill bill full cut which has never been released just to bump your number
dont forget to rate the series youve seen and the harry potter series as a whole
>>65057554
email.
>>65057587
Not OP but Kill Bill was supposed to be one 4+hr long movie. Was just cut into two so normies wouldn't be intimidated.
>>65057698
where is this?
>>65057749
see
>>65057589
it looks like mine came today. just check the email associated with your acct
>>65057821
wut?
>>65057918
email. email. it came in a fucking email.
dunno how to be any clearer.
>>65058275
you're a pedophile
>>65058275.................wut?................/spoiler]
>>65057626
i know
and he did not watch the entire cut because its not avaliable
he shouldnt rate it
>>65058956
Maybe he went to a double-screening.
http://ihousephilly.org/calendar?page=1
Aside from I Clowns and The Long Voyage Home, is there anything else listed from the 23 to the 30th that I should see?
Hope everyone had a good Follow The Papa Day!!
>>65059315
fuck the papa!
>>65059315
Follow the Papa
