Rank them from best to worst
1. Scorsese
2. Coppola
3. Spielberg
4. Lucas
>>64907334
This and only this
>>64907307
Lucas > rest of those nobodies
1. based Lucas
2. Coppola
3. Scorsese
4. Spielberg
>>64907307
Haha Lucas that absolute madman!
>>64907307
Kino = Lucas
Cinema = Scorsece
Film = Coppola
Flick = Spielberg
>>64907334
Prime Coppola was leagues better than scorcese ever was, but overall yeah.
Prime Coppola is the best and Prime Scorsese is second. Lucas and Spielberg never had a prime.
Overall, the correct order would be this >>64907334
>>64907307
literally whos and lucas.
not hard..
>>64907307
Anything other than Lucas at 1 is contrarianism
>>64907307
>all balding except for Lucas
wew
this
>>64907334
Lucas is just a Jewish lacky.
Prime Coppola>Prime Scorsese>Spielberg>Scorsese>Coppola>Lucas
>>64907307
Scorsese>Coppola>Spielberg>Lucas>De Palma
I think Lucas actually had more talent than Spielberg but squandered it
>>64907469
Hey Reddit, didn't see you there
70s Coppola was literally the greatest american filmmaker of modern cinema
>>64907307
1. Lucas = white
coincidence/?? i think mot
>>64907307
I dont rank things coz im not autistic.
The one who made the best films is Coppola
The one who made the ones I liked the least is Lucas
Spielgerg is more consistent than Scorsese, with higher highs as well
>>64907511
Scorsese made some very important films then too and has remained largely consistent
>>64907531
>Spielgerg is more consistent than Scorsese, with higher highs as well
le no
>>64907373
>7373
dubs correct
>>64907531
>Spielgerg is more consistent than Scorsese, with higher highs as well
Spielberg has been a consistently average or even mediocre director since Jurassic Park
>>64907307
1. the one who isn't a balding geriatric cuck
2. the rest
Spielberg>Coppola>Scorsese>Lucas
>>64907554
Schindler's List, Saving Private Ryan, ET, Close Encounters, Raiders of the Lost Ark are all better than anything Scorsese's done
Bridges of Spies is better than anything Scorsese did in the last 25 years
Again, I like Scorsese, but Spielberg and 70s Coppola are so much better its not even funny
>>64907699
go to bed, Steven
>>64907531
>Spielgerg is more consistent than Scorsese, with higher highs as well
Yeah, right, who can forget such gems like War Horse, Tintin, The Terminal, A.I., War of the Worlds, and Catch Me If You Can (let's be honest, it's an IMDb-tier flick)
1. Coppola
2. Lucas
3. Spielberg
4. Scorcese
>>64907719
>Schlinder's List
jew oscar bait
>Saving Private Ryan
war oscar bait, it does have some good scenes though
>ET, Close Encounters, Raiders of the Lost Ark
good films but all from 30 years ago, none of them are as strong films as Raging Bull
>Bridges of Spies is better than anything Scorsese did in the last 25 years
it's terrible, wtf are you on about?, all his recent films sucks, his last good movie was Munich
>>64907843
Okay I agree, Raging Bull is better than Spielberg's best stuff but you get my point.
>>64907753
A.I is Spielberg's best film. The masses just didn't have the cinematic training required to fully appreciate it.
1. Scorsese
2. Spielberg
3. Coppola
4. Lucas
>>64907719
good Spielberg
>ET
>Raiders
>Jurassic Park
>Duel
>Jaws
>Munich
>Artificial Intelligence
>Minority Report
>The Last Crusade
okay Spielberg
>Schindler's List
>Saving Private Ryan
>Catch me if you can
>The Temple of Doom
shit Spielberg
>Lincoln
>Bridge of Spies
>Tintin
>War of the Worlds
>The Lost World
>Hook
>Kingdom of Crystal Skull
>The Colour Purple
he's not that consistent, he peaked in the 70s and 80s, most of his films after 2000 are not very good
>>64907775
Coppola still makes movies faggot. And they are terrrrrrible.
Not many people seem to remember where George Lucas comes from. And then they wonder why Star Wars is suddenly shit without him.
if you put
>Spielberg over Scorsese or Coppola
or/and
>Lucas last
you're literally everything wrong with /tv/
Scorsese is a manlet so he is automatically ranked last in any list worthwhile.
>>64908009
it's hard to rate Lucas because he only made two films before building his Star Wars empire
>>64908009
They are all better than Malick
>>64908252
Eli Roth is a better director than Malick these days
>>64907463
why is George so based?
>>64908296
>>64908252
I literally screamed reddit meme out loud. Wallow in your IMDB filth.
>>64907307
George Lucas is awesome
Dunno who those other guys are
>>64908321
Malick's last good film was The New World, since then he has been churning out art house bait
>>64907307
As Director
Scorsese > Coppola > Spielberg > Lucas
As Writer
Coppola > Lucas > Scorsese > Spielberg
As Producer
Lucas > Spielberg > Scorsese > Coppola
>>64907979
>schindler's list
>saving private ryan
>not good
lmao
>>64908348
Whatever you say, redditor :)
>>64908404
i'd say that Coppola is a better director than Scorsese but everything else is spot-on
scorsese > coppala > zemeckis > goldberg = lucas
Italians>Jews
>>64908348
Even if you didn't have the sophistication to enjoy The Tree Of Life, To The Wonder or Pыцapь кyбкoв, The New World is better than anything Scorcese, Coppola, Spielberg or Lucas have ever made.
>>64908455
Both of them are too sentimental and filled with obvious propaganda to be considered great films
>>64907979
I dont get why people shit on War of the worlds and Lincoln
>>64907307
1. Based Lucas
2. Coppola
3. Spielberg
4. Scorsese
>>64908508
it's just a simple fact that Malick's old films are better than his newer ones
>>64908511
>filled with obvious propaganda
Back to /pol/
>>64908522
they're just not very good films anon
>>64908537
Except not. His career hadn't even begun artistically speaking until The Thin Red Line. Badland is like a capeshit drawing of an autistic child compared to The Tree Of Life or To The Wonder.
>>64908522
As far as lincoln goes, it's just assmad southfags.
>>64908538
>if you question the jew machine you are le meme board
Hello reddit.
The "holocaust" was a complete sham and even if it wasn't they still would have had it coming.
>>64907334
first reply best reply
Scorsese is the most consistent of them. He kept making great movies and overall has the most classics.
Coppola has four legendary classics but everything else is pure shit.
Jewberg is just a fucking wizard, everything he touches is pure gold.
Lucas created Star Wars, and that's what gets him on this privileged list.
>>64908583
hahahahahahahah okay kiddo
>>64908610
>The "holocaust" was a complete sham
> and even if it wasn't they still would have had it coming.
Spoken like a true edgy teenager
Now back to your containment board
>>64907334
This but if Coppola didn't burn himself out after AN this could easily be ery different. He produced 3 masterpieces and one very good film within a decade. That's more than most people can do in a lifetime.
>>64908627
>Coppola has four legendary classics but everything else is pure shit.
The Conversation, Godfather Part 1, Apocalypse Now, ????????????
If you say godfather part 2 you reveal yourself to be an IMDB capeshitter.
>>64908673
not him, but Schindler's List and Saving private Ryan are very hamfisted about their messages, which puts off a lot of non-political people
>>64908522
War of the World was released during Cruise hate years.
>>64908685
You're fucking stupid if you can't see that Godfather 2 is a classic film.
>>64908685
Lucas has directed literally nothing apart from THX 1138, American Graffiti, and four Star Wars movies. How can you evaluate him when he's done so little?
>>64908673
Spoken like a true bull prepping KEK. You'd need mental illness to just accept the ridiculous jewish claims about the holocaust on face value. I'm 42 years old and right wing politics are far more welcome here than cuckspeak.
>>64908715
Oh please. It's better than part 3 but that's as far as I can go.
>>64908722
Godfather part 2 is the reddit sequel to a masterpiece.
>you will never be a rich director that pals around with other rich directors
>>64908740
You rate him on what he has produced and on that basis he honestly doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as the other three.
>>64908673
"le holocaust" wasn't was as BAD as jews make it out to be
you should go back to reddit, familia
>>64908711
>>64908522
it was an okay sci-fi movie, then the shitty ending came and kind of ruined it
>>64908776
>Oh please. It's better than part 3 but that's as far as I can go.
That might be true for you but for anyone with an appreciation for story and cinema it's going to go a lot further.
>>64908740
That's not how it works...
>>64908709
>hamfisted about their messeages
Just like 90% of the movies that are based on historical events. It doesn't stand in the way of the movie being a top tier drama
>>64908741
Grow the fuck up
>using cuckspeak in a supposedly serious conversation
You're 42 and act like you're 15, no one will take you seriously.
>>64908627
Rumble Fish is a good flick
>>64908913
It's a motion picture actually, nearing film.
>>64908812
If you really had an appreciation for cinema then you'd DESPISE part 2. The TDKR of its day. Of course the masses were too dumb to realize that and praised it anyway, Part 1 is in my all time top 3. Part 2 is one of the three movies I'd most like to erase from history alongside Aliens and Star Wars.
>>64908871
>Just like 90% of the movies that are based on historical events. It doesn't stand in the way of the movie being a top tier drama
Actually, it does. Good drama is open to interpretation from multiple sides, while SPR and SL hamfisted messages prevent that.
>>64908871
not really, good directors keep their political agendas in film more subtle
>>64908806
Don't you have a MLP marathon to finish or something?
>>64908947
whats so bad about it btw?
>>64908993
Being a cartoon worshipping degenerate and lapping up every lie the jewish media tell you go hand in hand.
>>64908958
>Good drama is open to interpretation from multiple sides
Not necessarily
>>64909018
I wonder how many hours you spend on /pol/ every day, and I cringe
>>64908947
>The TDKR of its day.
How?
>>64908947
The Godfather 2 is a great movie. Plus it can be appreciated on its own because there's no important storyline from the 1st to tell and it also expands on Vito's story in the flashbacks so you don't have to see the part 1 if you don't want to...and really it's just about as well written as part one
The Dark Knight Rises is mediocre...it's more or less good when compared to other capeshit I guess, but a mediocre movie is a mediocre movie...shame on you for comparing the both
>>64909067
It is, though. If you want to see good Spielberg drama vs bad Spielberg drama, compare Munich to Schindler's List.
>>64909167
Schindler's List is considered better by most people, and I concur.
>>64909228
generally speaking the thing most people like is a piece of shit
>>64907334
/thread
>>64909259
I doubt a saying like that can be backed up
>>64909259
That's stupid
>>64909325
>>64909335
okay, feel free to enjoy the force unleashed my friends
>>64909228
>considered better by most people
It's considered better by most people because Jewish hollywood promoted it more heavily since it carries the exact black and white message that they like the masses to believe. Munich is less one sided so they didn't push it as hard.
I wonder how the other three feel when Lucas is around and making stupid suggestions as he often does or brings up a critique on their work.
I wonder how Lucas feels when he's at their houses and sees all of their Oscars.
>>64909228
thats because Schindler's List is a much more simple and infantile movie produced to inspire holocaust guilt and further narrative that Nazi=Evil
>>64909385
>>64909430
>>64909259
>everyone but me is stupid, their opinion don't count
I'm sure
1. Coppola pre 80s
2. Scorsese
3. Spielberg
4. Lucas
5. Coppola post 90s
>>64908947
>I'd most like to erase from history alongside Aliens
notbadobama.jpg
Thought you were kinda reddit there for a moment but maybe you have a point. I too shit on Aliens (and T2).
scorsese>>>coppola>>>>>>>>>>>>>spielberg>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>topo gigio
>>64909398
i wonder how the other three feel when they see Lucas' beautiful lustrous hair
>>64909464
People believe what the media tells them to believe. You don't gain the tools to form to a valid opinion until you have been educated on jewish media corruption.
>>64909228
Schindler's List is very one-sided. You are forced throughout the movie to side with the Jewish people. There is very little to no time put in exploring or validating people from the other side. Instead, they are mostly put as horrific people. It is very clear that the director is forcing you to side with one side and will manipulate you in doing so.
Compare that to Munich, in which first the Jewish POV is explored, and afterwards the muslims are brought in and it is shown that their actions and motivations are similar to the Jews. Throughout the movie, the horrific actions of both sides are explored without being preachy about any side, and this restraint from the director allows you to interpret the movie instead of being manipulated in accepting a certain message.
>>64909144
The problem is Michaels story arc by the end of 1 for all intents and purposes is over. He had his fall from grace and became the monster his father never became. 2 is just more of Michael being shitty to everyone around him.
Lucas probably fucked prime Portman so there's that
>>64909550
So basically what you're saying is that unless someone browses /pol regularly his opinions are pretty much irrelevant.
Can't take you seriously
>>64909633
>brings in /pol/
Be gone with you.
>>64909633
Your mindset that anybody who questions the media is associated with a meme board on the internet makes you impossible to take seriously.
>>64909668
Am I wrong? You don't browse /pol/?
Because your ideology seems to correlate with theirs, and since we're browsing 4chan it's very unlikely that you don't.
>>64909464
It's an embarrassing movie m8, cracked out from Hollywood nepotism to further their holocaust industry
More Germans were killed in WW2 than Jews, but nobody is allowed to make a film about their suffering, a film from their prospective, it's just unabashed brainwashing
>my neck
>my back
>my pussy
>and my cracking
Only correct order
>>64909742
perspective*
>>64909742
>More Germans were killed in WW2 than Jews, but nobody is allowed to make a film about their suffering, a film from their prospective, it's just unabashed brainwashing
Oh right, because dying while fighting for your country and being systematically murdered is pretty much the same
>>64909719
>/pol/ has a specific ideology
Questioning the jew has nothing to do with /pol/.
>>64909874
Germans were systematically murdered and raped when they lost the war, most people just don't know because Hollywood films don't get made about it
>>64909897
It does, I'm not saying everyone there thinks the same, but there's a plausible consensus on most political issues over there.
>>64909939
Not systematically, and it was by people who lost 27 million of their brothers fighting your soldiers.
People in this website are so out of touch with reality it's amazing.
>>64909955
Questioning the jew has no more to do with /pol/ than enjoying the films of Martin Scorcese has to do with /tv/.
They are common opinions that anybody interested in the topics of either movies or politics would be likely to reach on their own.
>>64910007
>People in this website are so out of touch with reality it's amazing.
Says the man who thinks Schindler's List is a reasonable depiction of the holocaust.
>>64910007
>it is considered out of touch with reality to suggest Germans suffered as much as Jews from WW2
it's actually quite impressive how effective their propaganda is, most are to afraid to even question it
>>64908473
From my point of view Coppola has worse movies than Scorsese overall, even if Coppola has 2 (Let's say 3) 10/10 films.
Coppola > Scorsese > power gap > George Lucas > Spielberg
>>64910036
>questioning the jew
It just so obvious you're from pol
>>64910064
Oh yeah I'm sure in reality it was all a hoax
>>64910167
Jews are the most distrusted people on the planet. That has been been proven time and time again throughout history. So what exactly does distrusting them have to do with /pol/?
>>64910094
>it is considered out of touch with reality to suggest Germans suffered as much as Jews from WW2
Kek, it is seeing how they started WW2
>>64907334
Correct.
Ranked by best flicks
1. Apocalypse Now
2. American Graffiti
3. King of Comedy
4. A.I. Artificial Intelligence
>>64910167
>MUH POL WAAAAH
you're embarrassing yourself, not everyone with a different opinion to you browses /pol/, get over it
>>64910195
Seeing how you browse 4chan right now I'm just assuming you're from pol
I'm sure there are plenty of other offensive forums you browse
>>64910228
Go back to whatever racist shithole you crawled out of then. I don't really care as long as you offend other people
>>64909481
This is actually the most accurate.
>>64910216
technically they didn't, but regardless, it was the common people who suffered the most when the war ended, but Hollywood likes to push the the infantile myth that only Jews suffered in WW2, which is what makes Schindler's List not a great film, it's detached from reality. Jews are so obsessed with the holocaust they can't look at the war from other perspectives
>>64910278
you're on 4chan, kill yourself if you can't deal with being offended
>>64910298
>t only Jews suffered in WW2
No one pushes this myth
You're out of touch with reality
>>64910333
Hollywood does
>>64910324
I can deal with it
What's weird is that this people are being so offended when you tell them to go back to /pol/
>>64907979
I'll take ET, Raiders and Last Crusade, Jaws, Minority Report and Hook.
Of the others I've seen, none are bad but none are great.
>>64910278
There is literally nothing wrong with disliking certain races. There are completely valid reasons to do so.
I read your posts and see a man who is afraid to think for himself, to question the world around him. Why is it bad to be "racist"? Because the media owned by one of the most hated races of all tells you so?
1. Lucas (he basically created a culture and a lifestyle, something the other chums can barely even dream about... lame later years, but still)
2. Coppola (simply better and less autistic than Scorsese)
3. Scorsese
4. Spielberg
>>64910353
Nope
>>64910379
That's morally wrong. You can't generalize millions of people. I'm not doing and I'm not gonna it because it turns you into a hateful and bitter person.
>>64907307
1 coppola
2 scorsese
3 spielberg
4 hack lucas
>>64907307
5.) Lucas
4.) Usual Coppola
3.) Spielberg
2.) Best Coppola
1.) Scorsese
>>64907307
70s Coppola>Scorsese>70s Lucas>Spielberg>Coppola>Lucas
>>64907307
so... are you guys rating coppola first for 3 movies, being 2 part of a series of movies?
>>64910441
I don't even think every jew, black, female, arab, or LGBT is necessarily a bad person, but if you have your eyes open it's clear that they are culturally destructive at large. Would you let your country get swamped by african immigrants who are statistically certain to send your crime rate through the roof just because you can't say for sure that they are all shitty people? Even if you can feel good about the few that may be smart hardworking folk with hearts of gold that's not much of a silver lining when women can't go outside without being raped in the street.
>>64907307
>coppola gets praise for 3 old as fuck movies, the rest of his career being average
>everyone hates on spielberg because he is popular, and it makes it easy for special clubbers on 4chan like you to feel smarter and superior than the rest of the population
>people love this but i secretly know its shit cause of my superior movies knowledge
scorcese is probably the best though, and i think its hard to take lucas seriously after the prequels.
so i would rate:
1. scorcese
2. spielberg
3. coppola (even though in the 70s he was the best)
4. lucas
>>64907467
Is there a single non-jew in the picture? Is there a single non-jew in holywood?
>>64910584
>. Would you let your country get swamped by african immigrants who are statistically certain to send your crime rate through the roof just because you can't say for sure that they are all shitty people? Even if you can feel good about the few that may be smart hardworking folk with hearts of gold that's not much of a silver lining when women can't go outside without being raped in the street.
That's not what makes you racist.
Immigration is obviously gonna lead to poverty, and poverty leads to crime and rape. So not wanting your country flooded with immigrants has nothing to do with race.
What makes you racist is thinking that all black people behave this way
>>64910369
>What's weird is that this people are being so offended when you tell them to go back to /pol/
Perhaps because only retards think 4chan boards have different and unique users.
>>64910800
lucas was never hollywood when he started
he was just a film student who made it in a jewish industry run by connections
>>64910807
>What makes you racist is thinking that all black people behave this way
I don't think that all black people are like that. But I think that ENOUGH black people are like that for it to be completely reasonable to say you dislike black people at large. Some races are a worse than others. There will be exceptions, but on the whole blacks prove themselves to be less accomplished than whites, so why should I feel bad about not wanting them in my backyard?
>>64910922
Your problem is with immigration, not blacks
Why are you hating black people? If there would be a war involving a white country you could have white refugees knocking at your door as well, do you really think that white refugees won't commit crimes and rape? That's what poverty does.
>>64907307
Martin Scorsese > Steven Spielberg > Francis Ford Coppola > George Lucas
Scorsese is the most talented and consistent of the bunch.
>>64911061
>Why are you hating black people?
Because they are genetically pre-disposed to having lower IQs than white people and are more prone to aggression. Yeah, I'm sure there would be plenty of stupid poor white folks robbing me too, but that would be a product of their environment rather than a genetic flaw.
>>64911140
That's because IQ correlates with education. Do you think a child who grew up in some poor village in Africa would have the same IQ as a kid who grew up in a western country? Are black people who live in Africa (or even a poor part of a western city) not a product of their environment?
Where does this superiority complex come from? This is what turns people into social rejects.
>>64907334
Coppola made like 4 incredible films and tons of shit. Spielberg has been consistent for decades.
>Spielberg
>Scorsese
>Lucas
>Coppola
Come at me.
>>64911285
>Are black people who live in Africa (or even a poor part of a western city) not a product of their environment?
Yes, but even if those african people had brought up in well educated, rich western households with every career oppurtunity open to them they'd still have a lower IQ and be more prone to crime than white people who were raised in the exact same circumstances, it's just their genetics.
>Where does this superiority complex come from?
Objective statistical data.
>>64911349
>Spielberg has been consistent for decades.
Consistently mediocre.
>>64911416
>Yes, but even if those african people had brought up in well educated, rich western households with every career oppurtunity open to them they'd still have a lower IQ and be more prone to crime than white people who were raised in the exact same circumstances, it's just their genetics.
I'd love to see you prove something like that
>>64911510
It has already been proven.
>>64907307
Coppola > Scorsese > Spielberg > Lucas
>>64907940
No, it was a mess and Spielberg was out of his depth, just like when he did the last Indy movie.
I don't call him a hack for it though. Can all bat 100.
>>64911442
Consistently watchable. Coppola has gone off the deep end. Lucas 2.0
>>64911545
More prone to crime?
>>64911612
Blacks have higher testosterone levels. Couple that with the lower IQ and you have higher levels of violent crime.
>>64911611
Twixt or Tetro are more sophisticated cinema than anything Scorcese or Spielberg have made since the 70s.
>>64911659
I wouldn't call that proof
>>64907307
1. Lucas
2. The rest
>>64908740
Only the nu Redditor audience hates Lucas.
Overall
1. Scorsese
2. Coppola
3. Spielberg
4. Lucas
Prime
1. Prime Coppola/Prime Scorsese
2. Prime Spielberg
3. Prime Lucas
>>64910636
>>coppola gets praise for 3 old as fuck movies, the rest of his career being average
You mean 4 movies. The Conversation is fantastic.
>>64911698
This has to be bait.
I don't even know who these people are. You want me to what guess them?
Nice board you have here. Not everybody is some nerd to know people without identification. So strange these topics here on 4 chan.
>>64907334
agreed. Lucas belongs straight in the trash though. Call the anti-rebbit police I don't care.
>>64912279
>Reddit meme man gif
Here's a man I can't take seriously.
Scorsese > Lucas > Spielberg > Coppola
