>Inarritu will win the Oscar this year
>A white man won't have won Best Director in 3 years ;_;
>you are face when(yfw) amy shoemer wins best picture for the white men
>>64733068
that filename
Unlike last year he probably deserves it
>>64733113
Who deserved it last year, anon? Muh 12 years? If it's anybody who deserved it last year, it's Inarritu.
>>64733113
>unlike last year
pleb.
What if Iñatrritu makes another good movie this year and wins three times in a row...
Has that ever happened, a director winning at least twice consecutively?
>>64733113
>unlike last year
This talentless IMDBcore pandering hack doesn't even "deserve" it this year
>>64733145
go back to your /rlm/ general, plebfaggot
>>64733145
Not even the same year you idiot
>>64733145
>>64733150
Fuck off back to reddit or your anti-art boards, the Golden Globes are over
>>64732999
No one gives a shit about the Golden Globes. Celebrities only show up because they serve booze.
>>64733243
>implying you're not the Redditor
>MUH AUTHENTIC ART
>MUH PRETENTIOUSNESS
>>64733192
hes not gonna make another movie this year, usually he takes 2 years btw movies, Birdman and Revnant was an exception.
>>64733068
Best filename of 2016
>>64733286
That doesn't make any sense considering they can buy all the booze they ever want
You mean they show up because its just a whole event/press thing
How many years?
>>64733607
Well yeah, but it's lot more fun to sit through a long awards show when you've got a buzz going.
>>64733289
>MUH TOO LONG FOR ME
>MUH LE WRONG GENERASHUN!!
All these plebs hating birdman, 2deep4u?
>>64733113
birdman? more like tour-de-forced
the virtuosity on display evidently is enough for many to praise this stunt to the sky, but even that virtue isn't all it's cracked up to be: a lot of the performances suffer as the result of the long-take format. keaton's teeth-grinding approach is up and down, and emma stone appears completely lost without the editorial control afforded by traditional cutting. (norton on the other hand is a force of nature and puts everyone else in the cast to shame)
the script is riddled with "punchy" lines that whiff terribly, and the "enigmatic" final shot is a copout (especially frustrating because the film teases us over and over again with faux-suicides).
but mostworst is that the film is a daisy chain of potshots. this is meant to be an "incisive" film but it's more like a manic stabbing at an empty pillowcase with a butterknife. what exactly is this film's perspective, besides the fact that everyone and everything is riddled with bullshit? the only truth "birdman" actually clarifies is that inarritu's purview is hopelessly jaundiced and pathetic. this junk isn't really inside riggan thompson's head (despite the gimmick-laden scenes of "introspection"), it's just underneath his wig. a simpleminded piece of unenjoyable trash whose countless shortcomings are masked by competent execution of choices made in the pre-production process, and in some ways one of the year's worst releases.
>>64733192
Two directors have won two consecutive awards.
John Ford (The Grapes of Wrath, 1940 and How Green Was My Valley, 1941)
Joseph L. Mankiewicz (A Letter to Three Wives, 1949 and All About Eve, 1950)[7][11]
>>64733222
Muh 12 years refers to Boyhood not 12 Years a Slave, pleb
