>"Christopher Nolan tries too hard to be a great director, while Quentin Tarantino makes it look easy. Tarantino basically just shits out great movies."
Do you agree with this assessment?
Is Nolan essentially Salieri to Tarantino's Mozart?
>>64698874
did they really praise tarantino?
>>64698874
yes, Nolan will not be remembered as one of history's greatest filmmakers, but Tarantino will
I do think Tarantino writes better, but Nolas have more interesting stories.
dat stache jay
>Is Nolan essentially Salieri to Tarantino's Mozart?
they literally said tarantino isn't high brow but for some reason plebs think he is
>>64698893
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3wiUNRv7sg
>>64698958
>implying
They said he was a top tier screen writer and filmmaker.
"Great movies" is probably going to far outside of Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown (and Reservoir Dogs but that film is a huge ripoff of City on Fire)
He's a good writer and can seem to make anything his characters talk about inreresting. Though sometimes this can be masterbatory, like those two sheriffs talking about whay happened to Kurt Russel in Death Proof. As a director he mainly takes pacing and cinematography from other movies, which is disapointing
>>64698929
His brother writes stories with interesting concepts but they are always way too literal and skin deep. Nolan is a half decent director but tries to hard to insert deep meanings in his movies.
>>64698874
duh. nolan is hilariously try hard
>>64699006
not a huge tarantino but but he is clearly a good filmmaker.
WHAT IS TARANTINO?
>cuck
>bbc lover
>feet man
>fartist
>he's not gonna do it
>pleb
>literally reddit
AND WHAT IS CHRISTOPHER 'BRAVO' NOLAN?
>artist
>deep
>big stature
>writes kino
>hates flicks
>loves the star wars prequels
>patrician
>>64698874
they have a point
nolan tries way too hard to be grandiose and bombastic
tarantino is so effortless in his style
should i see H8?
I agree Nolan tries too hard. It makes his films very rigid and mechanical.
Tarrantino is just a lazy cunt who makes violent pastiches of old genres, with a few "niggers" thrown in for shock value.
They have that instantaneous but short term appeal, though, because they are based on recognizable elements.
>>64698929
>I do think Tarantino writes better
what the fuck do you mean idiot
>>64698874
That's so on point I'm surprised it came out of those hack frauds. I might even start watching them again.
>>64699131
how can you be a hack at having opinions?
>>64699049
You're exactly the kind of shithead who's killing the board.
>>64699164
for you
>>64699153
By having shitty opinions? How can you be so stupid not to know they call themselves hack frauds? Are you fresh off the boat from gaia?
>>64698874
No. Anyone who thinks Tarantino has made a good movie since Kill Bill 2 is irrevocably pleb.
>>64699201
Anyone who dislikes his movies after Kill Bill 2 is just parading their peasantry.
>>64699010
Other movie that literally nobody who isn't a massive film sperglord like himself has ever heard of.
Where do you draw the line between ripping off and paying homage? Because Quentin has certainly never tried to hide from his influences
>>64699017
>comic books are dumb and for nerds what if batman actually happened in the real world lmao that would be awesome because he would be totally shitty and get fucked up all the time
>>64698874
Tarantino is a better writter obviously; he is also a better filmmaker. But this comparison isn't apt: both directors are very popular and appeal to milennials yes, but their target audiences and their style are complety different. Nolan is a big spectacle director: his peers are Whedon, Abrams, Cameron, Spielberg, Bay and others.
Tarantino movies pander to the film buff audience, but they are also easily digestible enough for casuals. That's why he is so popular, even more than Nolan
>>64699194
>gaia
Nice Pre-2010 reference.
>>64699226
lol
>>64699201
>Death Proof
>pleb
I see you're practicing irony today anon
>>64698929
Nolan loves concepts but he doesn't know shit about an emotional flow... which is strange, because he claims to use a more or less associative way when he edits his movies.
>>64699575
Nolan directed Batman movies. There's nothing more casual than that.
>>64698893
Say what you want about Tarantino but if you deny he's a master craftsman when it comes to film you're short a few chromosones
Tarantino is honestly really good technically, and creatively. I'm just not a fan of his output.
He's as much of an artist as Andy Warhol
>>64699575
Not sure I'd put Nolan in the same league as Spielberg.
Nolan's style really needs something more signature than just "sterile, crisp and operatic."
Everything he's done for the last decade or more feels like fucking Inception.
>>64698874
Good or bad, Tarentino makes memorable and original films, which makes them automatically better than the bland shit that Nolan makes.
>>64699700
He said it's his worst so that makes it true.
>>64699010
Are you praising Jackie Brown?
>>64699851
>implying there are more parts to movie making than the technical side and the creative side
>>64698874
Tarantino is a skilled worksman, while Nolan is a hack artist.
>>64699969
What the fuck else is there to filmmaking than technicality and creativity?
At least Nolan is not your typical californian liberal cuck. That's all we have at this point of SJW cultural dictatorship.
I do think Nolan tries too hard, but Tarantino doesn't even try, anymore.
>>64700092
Here's your reply.
You can stop refreshing now.
>>64700092
And what does your dank meme bullshit have to do with the quality of his filmmaking, you child?
>>64700195
I dont give a shit nor need good cinematography for wigger cuckold porn.
agree Nolan works harder and it shows, Nolan is the better and more successful filmaker of the two right now cause he is not afraid to experiment and try new things
since Jackie Brown (his master piece) flopped Tarantino is just pandering to his audience
>>64699803
Nolan actually elevated capeshit, all downhill since he stopped
>>64700259
That's sort of dumb, since Tarantino attempts to change it up between movies, Kill Bill, Inglorious Basterds, Death proof and Django are nothing like one another in terms of content.
I don't care for either Tarantino or Nolan, I have no horse in this race.
>>64698893
They fucking despise Tarantino as a person, but they are reviewing movies
>>64700095
>but Tarantino doesn't even try, anymore.
Yet somehow, he still manages to make great films, which is sort of what ampf and susan were saying in their review.
>>64698874
Cuckatino has been on a slow downward spiral since the early 90s'.
Tarantino only makes pleb flicks
>>64700326
>Nolan actually elevated capeshit
Rises was pretty mediocre in terms of capeshit. Not as bad as Snyder's garbage, but close enough to Whedon's.
>>64700585
They also mentioned that, the fact that he loves schlock and somehow manages to legitimize it. He's a talented filmmaker, whether you like his movies or not.
>>64700326
Dark Knight Rises can only justify itself through babe posting but outside of that its pretty fucking awful
>>64699130
I meant that the dialogue in Tarantino movies are more interesting and fluid, feels more natural, while in Nolan movies the dialogue doesn't feel that way, but the concept of getting into people dreams is more interesting than a movie about people in a cabin.
Got it?
>>64700092
Go back to cripplechan, you're not wanted here anymore.
>>64700585
whereas nolan makes...?
>>64698874
>>64700778
Patrician kinematography
Nolan is desperate to be seen as an intellectual, and it shows. It's very off-putting.
Tarantino doesn't make it look easy, but there is a certain cool about Tarantino. Lately, it's been stupid shit, though, like CHAPTER FOUR: DINGUS HAS A SECRET
>>64700807
Tarantino is tots a jewish name, you inbred mongoloid.
>>64700940
I know the Fritz Lang statement Nolan made is a meme and all, but that is really indicative of how Nolan sees himself and the movies he makes. He was talking about a fucking batman movie.
Tarantino just wants to make transparent, badass movies. Whether you like them or him is not the point, he knows exactly the shit he is making.
>>64698874
Nolan is overrated but tarantino is a washed up has been flogging the same long dead horse for nearly 20 years now.
>>64699049
>>cuck
>>bbc lover
>>feet man
>>fartist
>>he's not gonna do it
Based.
>pleb
>literally reddit
Are you memeing about yourself, memeboy?
>>64699006
they mention this video in the review they definitely browse here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxYHxJahzmU
>>64701184
Both are extemely overrated but i think Tarantino deserves some of the praise he gets from normies whilst Nolanfags are deluded film buffs
>>64700524
>hating the biggest human meme factory
>>64701561
Do you somehow think /tv/ invented that video and are the only ones who know about it?
DISAPPOINTED IN LACK OF TARANTINO POSTING REALLY GOOD BANTS TO BE HAD DESU PHAMILIA
>>64701648
I know they mention it after /tv/ has been shitposting en masse that image of quentin getting coffee
>>64698874
Why does Mike sport the Hitler stache? Is he tired of denying it?
>>64701648
they browse /tv/. Rich was talking about /tv/ several times during streaming on twitch.
>>64699967
Why not? Jackie Brown is immensely underrated
>>64698874
Tarantino has made a single good movie, not a single great one and nothing short of garbage beyond.
>>64701744
This is not the first time they use that video, garbage boy. Go watch the django review.
>Jay and Mike both like the pretentious, long-winded, masturbatory flick that is H8ful
>Hated Boyhood
Orite.
>>64699010
>He's a good writer and can seem to make anything his characters talk about inreresting
Literally all his characters have the same voice ie: his.
>>64701648
Everytime they have a new video up, they start a thread here.
>>64702066
The fact that they do a stream is very convenient for /tv/ autists. Anon so can make up anything and just say they said it on stream.
>Rich said on the stream that he killed his own parents and then fucked a pile of nachos. He totally really said that on the stream!
>>64702678
Even if your opinion was right, he still has just certain scenes better than entire Nolan movies.
>>64702859
There's no denying that nolan's shit sucks, but tarantino's does as well, massively. Nolan at least manages to make entertaining flicks, tarantino can't manage even that.
>>64700092
Why do you come on this board to discuss topics that belong on /pol/?
Please talk about cinema as an artform and not a socio-political platform.
Here's a better comparison for good ol "No Talent" Nolan
>>64702751
And yet those movies are nothing like each other. Fantastic job you did there.
>>64699059
I saw it in 70mm and loved it
>>64703382
Hyperbole. That's why nobody will ever take you seriously.
>>64698874
tarantino:
0 plane scenes with cia and bane
nolan
1 plane scene with cia and bane
how is this even a debate
Nolan and Tarantino can be summed up in two words.
Nolan: Hack
Tarantino: Edgy
Nolan makes semi enjoyable films, however he puts little effort into fleshing out the charectars or production value properly. His movies could be really good, however they suffer from him putting not enough effort into making them the best they could be, yet they still make tons of money. Hack
Tarantino makes edgy films to pander to teens and young adults. They're also well made, but its really ridiculous how many times he throws "nigger" or brutal violence into his films for shock value.
>>64703822
More like Uwebole
>>64704881
Shit...it checks out...
>>64705112
>implying Christopher "Practical Effects* Nolan's movies are low production value
Watch out, your gonna pull a amuscel baiting that hard
>>64698874
But comparing both makes no sense though.
At least, try to compare directors within the same genre.
>>64698874
>comparing Tarantino to Mozart
No. QT works very hard on his movies. He also knows a lot about film. His motto is basically 'few but ripe'. He works on his movies for years before even releasing one. QT is more like Mozart in that he is talented, but also works VERY hard.
>>64698893
Believe it or not, but outside of /tv/'s contrarian circlejerk most film fans actually acknowledge Tarantino as a talented director.
>>64707500
>QT
>any talent whatsoever
SIDES, PLEASE COME BACK!
Quick question, is Hateful 8 any good and is it worth watching?
>>64707512
If they actually were film fans, they would endlessly bash tarantino. They're actually directorfans, i.e. circlejerker that cum at pictures of directors regardless of their work.
>>64708207
shitposting aside, it seems polarizing. If you liked the setting of Django and the overall feeling of Reservoir Dogs, then you'll probably like this.
It's executed well, not the magnum opus people were expecting imo, but one of his better films
>>64708201
What's your filmography look like, bro? Or what's your name? We'll see if you're a well known movie critic that people actually listen to.
I'll wait.
jay want to suck off tarantino.
it's obvious that he's a faggot at this point
>>64698874
I think they were being sarcastic.
>>64708397
They clearly weren't though. You dumb, bro?
>>64708419
Why you so angry? You autistic, bro?
>>64698874
Wtf. Have you even seen Inception? Easily better than anything Tarantino has "shit out"
>>64708303
Okay, thanks. I wasn't sure whether I should see it at the cinema or wait until home release.
It's so obvious that Mike has a look of disgust on his face as Jay is gagging on Tarantino's dick for the entire review
>>64708654
The fuck are you talking about? They both love Tarantino.
I'm just back from The Hateful Eight.
GLIB FUCKING FACSIMILE OF EVERYTHING HE'S DONE BEFORE I SAY
>those fucking angel wings when they hang Daisy
>>64699010
Reservoir Dogs ripped off lots of movies. The whole structure is stolen from Kubrick's the Killing, the backstory of each member of the heist one by one. The ending is a ripoff of Mean Streets, almost shot for shot. It's Harvey Keitel having a breakdown when the cops show up and his friend gets shot.
Jackie Brown is good though, less obvious influences, mostly Truffaut.
>>64699201
>inglorious basterds
>bad
hi there contrarian ;^)
Hateful 8 had a shitty script, but apparently Tarantino didn't write it so I 'unno
>I really liked [Ennio Morricone's music]
Shut the fuxk up Jay, there was barely any score in the film
>>64698874
>Is Nolan essentially Salieri to Tarantino's Mozart?
A decent analogy, but in this case neither are playing the same kind of music so it's hard to make a comparison like that. Both are flawed, both do things exceptionally well, and both are more or less chained to their unique style. However I think Tarantino feels more effortless partially because he's just allowed to do what he does. He doesn't make studio pictures, he doesn't have existing IP's to work with, nor does he have some kind of a drive to sit in Speilberg's chair like Nolan does.
>>64708261
why would they endlessly bash tarantino if they were film fans
>>64709047
Since tarantino is forever touted as a film genius even though he's the antithesis thereof.
Anyone who gives a shit what these stupid neckbeard faggots think about movies is a stupid neckbeard faggot.
>>64699201
>[thing] stopped being good at [year I found 4chan]
>>64699059
I need to see H8ful again, but on first viewing I thought the writing was some of Tarantino's best. It was three hours long, but I still didn't want the conversations to end. Goggins is so based in this, as well as Jackson.
>>64698874
>Tarantino basically just shits out great movies
hahahaha wtf
REDDITlettermedia pretty much confirmed
>>64708909
>absolute dogshit
>good
hi there redditard ;^)
>>64709127
but he makes good movies
and he keeps making good movies
>>64709186
He couldn't even make a good flick to save his life.
>>>/reddit/
>>64698893
>did they really praise tarantino?
As far as saying he makes great schlock is praise.
>>64708595
Them reviewing Tarantino is a lot like them reviewing Force Awakens. They're going to have a personal bias because they're amateur directors, and all amateur directors love Tarantino because of Reservoir Dogs, a 1.8 million border-line amateur cult flick which survives on style and directing. Mike seemed to just think it was a good movie, probably because he's older, and has more well-respected idols. The same goes for the Hateful Eight, that they lament over no blue-screen, filming in real snow, etc, etc, they were very excited to see a film with a director who had total control and used that control for a lot of small things that they would appreciate, some would say more than the average reviewer.
Honestly, I'm tired of Tarantino flicks. They're very repetitive. A lot of innuendo and heated discussion, finished off with a bang. Literally almost every fucking movie he's made. And the violence he DOES show, he knows he can't stylistically direct the action, so he just over-compensates by making the action "campy".
I still have yet to see an "action scene" from Tarantino that's as thrilling as even this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qwskE8VFtw
>>64698874
What separates Tarantino films from everybody else is that they are HIS films, not films made by committee to appeal to the most diverse demographic population possible. Sometimes his shit is good, sometimes it's not, but at least when he fails, he does so because HE failed, and not because he had to film, or exclude, some shit the producers / financiers wanted.
>>64709289
Oh, as for how it's a lot like them reviewing Force Awakens, they have a personal bias, but not for the same exact reason, mainly because much like it is with Tarantino, Force Awakens used a lot of practical effects, real sets, and costumes. It was also a return to what they were familiar with.
I wonder if based Tarantino will really only make ten films.
>>64709298
>not films made by committee to appeal to the most diverse demographic population possible
Right, I'm sure he wasn't trying to appeal to the black community with Django, I'm sure he wasn't trying to appeal to the Jewish community with Inglorious Basterds, I'm sure he wasn't trying to appeal to the liberal community with Hateful Eight.
>>64709151
I enjoyed it more on a second viewing and I'll watch it at least one more time when a decent quality torrent goes up.
>>64709407
>he wasn't trying to appeal to the black community with Django,
Do you not realize that Tarnigtino identifies more with blacks than whites?
>>64709407
Tarantino is just an autistic savant who compiles all the cool shit he liked in other peoples movies and shoves it into one of his. "Appealing to the black community" is beyond his intellectual ability, he made Django because it was something new and shocking and fun not because he's some liberal faggot trying to fight on behalf of blacks.
You think Samuel L. Jackson would be such close friends with him otherwise? Jackson himself is pretty assburgers, they're just weirdo's making movies they're not pushing any agenda's.
>>64709569
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mzqahILpAs
>>64709602
|
|>
|
|3
|
>>64701178
>He was talking about a fucking batman movie.
Ironic that Burton's Batman had a more Fritz Lang feel to it.
>establish a few characters separately
>establish racist white guy baddies
>characters eventually interact towards a common goal of killing whitey
>insert swearing and violence
>looks like whitey will win
>minority character is assisted in killing whitey by racetraitor white protagonist
>final scene with unnecessary amounts of violence
Every Tarantino ever
>>64708595
>thinking inception is better than Tarantino's worst
Let me guess, is it because you're one of those really smart people who are capable of understanding such a masterfully crafted 2deep4u plot? :^)
>>64709894
Not him, but seriously, Inception had a better atmosphere than anything Tarantino would be able to unironically direct.
> Inception: directed by Quentin Tarantino
> SCREEN FADES TO BLACK
> Chapter 4: Entering Dream Level 1
> BBC and feet everywhere
> *Marvin Gaye music starts playing*
> Characters talk for 15 minutes about wet dreams
> Suddenly character 3 shoots character 7
> "Time to go deeper, niggers"
> SCREEN FADES TO BLACK
> Chapter 5: Entering Dream Level 2
> *California dreamin' starts playing*
> Jump cut to everyone having fun in the car, forgetting they're dreaming
> 20 minutes of pointless dialogue until they see something weird and someone points out they're in a dream
> "Shit nigga you rite!"
Why didnt the hangman tell anyone Daisy was in a gang?
Why didnt anyone take the pistol from the general?
Why did we need a flashback that gave us literally zero new information?
Why did Bob pretend to be mexican?
Why didnt Daisy die too when she got poison vomit in her mouth?
Why was a single jellybean suspicious to SLJ? Guess my entire room is a serial killer den.
Why did we need a 15 minute scene of them hammering poles into the ground?
Why did they decide to murder a dozen people at an inn and hope nobody there has a gun, and hope nobody else shows up, instead of just doing highway robbery?
If they are such an important gang, why didnt they just haggle for her life instead of a really dangerous mission?
Why did nobody check the basement?
>>64700192
>>64700195
>>64700755
>>64702962
These were all me btw :)
>>64709894
Tarantino is incapable of thinking up anything like Inception. His movies are literally just 4 or 5 people talking and shooting at each other. Tarantino isnt subtle enough to do anything like the spinning (wobbling?) top at the end
>>64709894
Inception is 10x better than anything tarantino has ever done. Combined.
>>64709376
>they have a personal bias
You already said that like three times, you scatterbrained piece of shit. Why are tripfaggots always a pointless waste of time?
Filtered.
Yes, Tarantino is great at making schlock, but it still only schlock with a high budget. He is incapable of making anything outside of genre garbage, and homages to exploitation movies. Nolan at least tries doing things outside of his comfort zone and constantly challenges himself as a director. Memento, The Prestige, TDK, and Interstellar are great films and are all very different, and each more ambitious
>>64710625
he is capable he just chooses not to be subtle
>>64709407
>trying to appeal to the liberal community with Hateful Eight
>main black character is a deranged sociopath and pretty clearly illustrates the way perceived racial injustices are used to justify antisocial behavior
>kurt russell beats the shit out of jennifer jason leigh at least once in every scene they're in, this is played for laughs
>the interracial gay sex act (which i'm assuming is what you think was liberal pandering) is portrayed as horrific and traumatizing
>legitimately evenhanded portrayal of a confederate character who in any other movie would be portrayed as flat-out evil, is instead presented as a loyal patriot and misguided at worst
>>64698874
>Tarantino basically just shits out shitty movies
Agreed wholeheartedly.
>>64699049
This, although as shit as Tarantino is, there is nothing wrong with being a footfag
>>64709210
>doesn't have a valid argument.
> calls it a flick and tells you to go back to reddit
Seriously someone like you would probably like reddit more. Then have sub sections so you don't have to read about QT on a board about film and television.
>>64712414
Footfags are the same tier as scatfag.shit tier.
>>64712425
>>>/reddit/
>>64698874
nolan tries way too hard most of the time, I really like most of his movies' approaches but then he does "nu uh, I'll have to include so much more because I'm the next kubrik" and then his movie goes to shit. except for memento, that ones perfect
The problem with Tarantino is that he sets his sights too low. Hateful Eight and Kill Bill and Django are fun to watch in theaters, but they have the residue of a talented filmmaker and they feel like they warrant more discussion than they actually do. And then I'm thinking about The Hateful Eight for hours and by the end of it I think Tarantino is shit, whereas if any other director had made a movie like that I'd just enjoy it and forget about it.
>>64712483
The thing with Nolan is that he's no fun at all. Which made him the perfect choice for saving Batman's image, but still. His movies feel so stiff.
>>64712473
good one
>>64698874
Why Chris Nolan Sucks
> Too many montages without depth and just use it to cram in more plot
> Generic Dialogue
> Generic acting
> Boring camera set ups
> Generic lame action scenes
> Plot twists are obvious (Interstellar)
> Believes that Inception is a complex plot and convoluted
> No cohesive editing (Dark Knight Joker attack on SWAT truck)
>>64712646
all these plus the over-dramatized dialogue
tons of cheese, especially in interstellar
>>64712473
>autism
>>64712646
>>64712909
I've learnt that Nolan's movies are the ultimate movie theater experience. Visual are top notch, same for the audio and action. The plot is just good enough to watch ONCE. You cannot watch any of his movies more than once, that's when they fall apart.
Modern Tarantino is shit all around though.
>>64713087
my opinion on tarantino has been declining for years but I thought the hatefull 8 was good
maybe because django dropped my expectations into a fucking canyon
>>64713087
>and action
Nolan films are a snoozer in that regard, the action is usually boring as sin.
>>64712438
>2015 + 1 x 1
>not even liking scat
Mate.....
WRITING COOL LINES IS NOT MASTERFUL FILMMAKING
JESUS CHRIST YOU IDIOTS
TARANTINO IS THE BIGGEST FRAUD OF THE PAST 30 YEARS
GO WATCH SOME BERGMAN OR SOMETHING YOU SHITS
>>64698874
>Tarantino basically just shit
stopped here
>>64713418
We're not talking about Tarantino's writing. We're talking about his filmmaking. All the caps in the world isn't going to make you look less stupid.
>>64713418
Go watch some marcel carne, yves roberts, or jean renoir you uneducated boor!
>>64699201
The key is that Kill Bill was his last film, the ultimate product of his imagination interacting with the greats from the past. Everything since then has been flicks because he knows he's already made his magnum opus and doesn't care anymore.
>>64698874
Its a cinema
>>64714382
Too bad kill bill was garbage and also 100% a flick.
>>64698874
Reminder that the last controversial opinion they've had about a film was Jurassic World.
>>64698874
I certainly do associate Tarantino with shitting
>>64714515
Except it isn't, it's one of the most tasteful and stylistic revenge movies in ages.
>Remakes Lady Snowblood
WHAT A TRUEEEEEEEEEEE VISIONARYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Western cuck film critics and journalists everyone
>"I really dislike [Tarantino] as a person, I think he's really obnoxious."
- Jay Bauman, 2016
>>64714620
I refuse to believe any human being can be dumb enough to believe this.
>>64714707
Your memes don't constitute real opinions. The fact is Kill Bill is by far Tarantino's best and is a shining example of visual storytelling.
>>64714928
I should call it visual/cinematic, the sound design is incredibly immersive as well.
>>64709289
I really can't stand Woo's bullet splooge. It takes all the impact of the scene out as you sit there watching minutes upon minutes of stormtroopers getting wasted. It's not good cinema.
>>64714928
You must be a nigger.
>>64709289
>asian flicks are absolute garbage through and through
>it's still better than tarantino's shit
Wew!
>>64715146
Good retort bro, keep up this Kill Bill is bad meme. I'm sure it will make someone laugh eventually.
>>64715299
Confirmed nigger, then. That explains everything. As I said, no human could possibly think that.
>>64715427
All of your opinions are decided by /tv/. You haven't had an original thought in years. I'm guessing 50% of your posts in the last month have been complaining about Star Wars.
>>64715633
>>>/tumblr/ where your cult awaits.
>>64699006
They also said that he wasn't really an artist. He's a fantastic flickster, but that's about it.
If anything Tarantino tries too hard and Nolan doesn't try hard enough.
Just compare Inglorious Basterds to Dark Knight Rises
>>64715841
Nice, tell me your username so I can give you some upboats for that one.
>>64716303
BenGarison
>>64698874
This is exactly what pisses me off about Tarantino, he doesn't even try anymore. Ever since Kill Bill he just makes silly goofy flicks he knows people will like. He's proved in the past that he has it in him to me great films (Jackie Brown, Pulp Fition), but now just settles for making edgy mememovies (Basterds, Django, H8ful).
>>64708595
>inception
Not OP but I went to see Inception in the theater. I was rolling my eyes after five minutes while the rest of the audiece was "ah"ing and "oh"ing at the shocking revelation that the intro sequence was all a dream all along! The rest of the movie was torture. Interstellar is already forgotten and everybody laughs at TDKR.
Nolan makes popcorn flicks for turbonormies but films them all in a clinical, somber tone giving the impressin that what you're watching is somehow serious. Then he throws in some high-concept ideas that seem complicated and deep to people with average IQs and presto, critical acclaim from pseudointellectuals and normies as well as millions of dollars from the fact that what you filmed was still capeshit nonsense. Fuck Nolan.
>>64716980
>he's so retarded he didn't even understand memeception!
>>64716980
your post reeks of self inflated ego and crushed dreams
>>64717150
>crushed dreams
That doesn't even make any sense.
But my ego is pretty small, thanks.
>>64699049
>cuck
please go back to >>>/pol/
>>64699049
>big stature
For the likes of you, maybe.
>>64700587
Snyder at least did a decent job with Watchmen even if people are pissed about their no aliens thing.
Are there any good torrents for Hateful 8?
I skipped the HIB spoilers so far.
>>64698874
>interstellar
>>64716980
>turbonormies
Disregarded your opinion
Nolan had made more memes than the entire internet combined
>>64699049
bakc to /pol faggot
Christopher "Exposition" Nolan
Christopher " lame attempts at humor" Nolan
>>64721288
Quentin "niggerlover" Tarantino
Quentin "lame attempts at flicks" Tarantino
Nolan doesn't even rehearse scenes, he's that shit as a director.
He was tasked with making a good movie with Batman 3 and phoned it in like the asshole he is.
Say what you want about Uno Farto but he tries his hardest when he makes his movies.
>>64702066
where? which stream? i'm curious
>>64721599
I only have one arm because of reasons. I could try my hardest to become a ballerina, doesn't mean anyone should actually consider even looking at me.
