Well this was a jumbled mess of strange accents, ridiculous dialogue and stilted performances. Why would anyone ever think people arguing for two hours is remotely interesting? It's an awful incoherent mess of a film. Editing was all over the place, completely lacked direction or focus, characters ramble off-topic in every scene, lacked any emotional depth or distinct characters. The same fucking back and forth lines with EVERY fucking character. No unique voice. No developed characters. Only pointless arguments between two people over and over again. Just terrible. Really fucking bad.
You know I'm right /tv/.
>>64674640
go to bed Ashton Kutcher
>movie is generally well regarded or outright acclaimed
>someone on /tv/ says every aspect of it is terrible and says everyone is wrong but him
Like clockwork
Ashton's film and performance were objectively better.
>>64674868
This. And I actually shared the enthusiasm for the vision of his company.
>>64674640
I loved it. Characters seemed pretty good too. Sounded like real people I could care for. Except Rogen, though he wasn't particularly atrocious.
>>64674640
>Why would anyone ever think people arguing for two hours is remotely interesting?
I for one enjoyed 12 Angry Men
>>64674917
Rogen is always on perpetual weed can't you tell by his laugh
>>64674856
>pleb who's never had an original though in his life
>projects delusions and uses the "contrarian" meme
Like clockwork Tbh
>Why would anyone ever think people arguing for two hours is remotely interesting?
go watch your fucking Star Wars
I didn't even like this film that much but that is one pleb argument, lad
>>64674640
Aaron Sorkin actually believes people talk like this. What a hack.
>>64675028
If you think every single aspect of the movie is bad then you are a contrarian, or are just eager to hate things
I agree. Can't remember a single characters name, it was that 1 dimensional and boring. NOT ONE.
>>64674907
I ALREADY FIRED YOU
>still no other rips than the shitty screeners
Fucking hell.
