>>64656850
Hahahaha

>>64656850
Yes.

Can't ditch the finch

>>64656850
I liked it, mainly thanks to the cast.

It is so bad the director discredited himself of it

>>64656988
nah, it's not bad and fincher is/ was being a little bitch about it

it came out alright all things considering

>>64656850
No it wasn't but the director's cut (the one with the ox) is much much better than the theatrical version (the one with the dog), and it had that Alien vibe again.

>>64656988
he disowned it because fox fucked it up in the editing room, the assembly cut is much closer to his original vision and is pretty great.

>>64656988

Fincher should discredit himself from almost all of his shitty filmography, he's a joke.

>>64657189
/tv/: the response.

All the Alien films are good in their own way, Alien 3's visual style was the best (or close to as good as the first one) but its overall the weakest but mostly due to how much they messed up getting a coherent script together.

>>64656850

laughable cgi

>>64657180
I still prefer the theatrical

the assembly cut is defanged, meanders too much in the middle and switching the dog to an ox cadaver didn't make any fucking sense whatsoever, not to mention that the dog scene was more disturbing and edited better

>>64657269
Are you honestly saying that resurrection is a better film than 3?

>>64656850
ALIEN: Perfect, bravo Scott!

ALIENS: Perfect, bravo Cameron

ALIEN 3: Literally shit rehash of ALIEN in Australia with shit cgi

ALIEN RESURRECTION: Litreally better than ALIEN 3, top banter

Aliens was terrible outside cinematography and production quality

>>64657311
I am

>>64657311
Its a tossup but while Alien 3 is better as a 'serious' Alien film, Resurrection is more fun, and the creature, alien, and mutant designs are fantastic.

>>64657386
But....I just watched it before Christmas. It isn't.....like, the story is terrible.

Been saying that for years, OP. Thank you for finally joining those of us that can form our own opinions. Now watch Hudson Hawk.