Is he the most overrated actor of all time?
No, leo is
>>64633747
That's not Bryan "SCREAMING IS ACTING" Cranston
>>64633789
literally came here to post this
someone i know honestly tried to call him the de niro of this generation. why is it only people who aren't that interested in cinema seem to be enamoured with him?
>>64633747
No, but up there. He appeals to teenage boys and immature younger men
>>64633747
I think people give him way too much shit actually. He's a solid actor who gets too much shit for being a teeny swarm because of... uh... why actually? Because his name is Brad?
>>64633747
How is he overrated?
>>64633874
Leo isn't as bad, at least he can play different characters. Literally every character Brad plays is the same, all with this out of place accent. He sounds like some guy talking to a stripper with that "smooth" voice he tries to put on.
Pitt is cool when he's the supporting actor. As a lead it's too hit and miss. Most overrated is between Will Smith, and Liam Neesons.
>>64633747
Nah Brad is a pretty great actor. Watch 12 Monkeys or Inglourious Basterds.
>>64633874
I wouldn't put him on De Niro level but he's still good and can show a lot of range. Even in a movie as mediocre as Gatsby he still showed talent.
>>64633956
>>64633987
he has two settings: serious or cocky
>>64633981
Will Smith isn't a bad actor he's just in shit movies. Men in Black was great and he killed it, in my opinion.
>>64633956
>every character is the same
>hasn't seen burn after reading
>hasn't seen benjamin button
besides those I agree, he's always the cool, suave good looking guy who's either in charge or too cool to take orders from anyone
>>64634020
Leo? Not true. For example in Gatsby he had a lot of scenes where he seemed really human and vulnerable.
>>64634020
oh you meant Brad my bad. I still disagree, he can act crazy too. He isn't my favorite actor but I do think he's really talented.
>>64633956
meet joe black
>>64633956
Leo is the better actor but he's definately overrated while brad is barely taken seriously at all.
>>64634135
Nah, I meant Leo.
I am the only one that thinks he isn't overrated but the movies he participates in get overrated for some reason?
>>64634302
I would agree with that
I think Fincher is a bit overrated. Brad Pitt is awesome but I haven't quite bonded with David Fincher's films.
>praying, hoping, swallowing own tongue in the hope nobody says daniel day-lewis
>>64634413
Daniel Day-Lewis
>>64633747
Overrated? When the hell is Pitt hyped?
He's a good, but not great actor.
>>64633789
Leo a tryhard shit.
>>64633845
Funny. He has the same middle name as Leo.
>>64633956
was he "brad" as jesse james? honest question
>>64634766
you guys are completely ignoring all the times Leo has showed emotion without yelling
He's a good actor, he does more than yell
>>64633906
Because he's handsome. He's done a lot of wildly varied roles and has shown impressive range as an actor, but people just remember him for his face.
But his character in Snatch was completely different than Interview with a Vampire was completely different than 12 Monkeys was completely different than Fight Club was completely different than Kalifornia, etc.
Brad is a mediocre-at-best actor, but he gets picked in big movies, giving him attention. He also has roles which are a bit quirky (not Wes Anderson quirky, but still quirky), that's why normies like him so much, because they notice his faggot face everywhere, and that's why he's so popular.
So yes, he's a bit overrated but it doesn't mean he's complete shit, at least he tries to act.
I think he's a good actor but now people will watch any movie as long as it has Brad Pitt in the lead role look at world war z
>>64635252
WWZ really wasn't THAT bad though.
Gorlami!
