>all TFA backlash directed at Mike
>Jay gets off without a scratch
>>64595645
Jay's not a hardcore Star Wars fan. He probably saw the movie, enjoyed it for what it is, and hasn't thought about it since. He likes weird arthouse shit and cult movies.
>>64595645
>>you deserve backlash for sharing a differing opinion on media
fucking christ, you're all worse than bleeding heart liberals
>>64595645
Just wait until Jay shills for the next Friday the 13th reboot
>>64595645
Mike also created Plinkett which is inescapably linked to Star Wars (forever)
>>64595645
>backlash
Jesus Christ, faggot, just kill yourself.
>Rich is always in the background even though he's the most patrician
He needs to split off and do his own reviews already.
it's because he's the jewish one
>>64596002
He used to be such a QT
>>64595802
>implying Jay's not a hardcore Star Wars fan
>implying he only likes weird arthouse shit and cult movies
I want casual Jay fans to leave.
>>64596002
wow he dun goofed
>>64595645
>backlash
A few threads on /tv/ doesn't count as backlash. Also why should there be backlash because someone has an opinion you don... oh nevermind forgot where I was.
Stopped caring about them when they started being buddies with Max Landis
>>64596252
Mike's opinion is objectively wrong, though. And the fact that he showed he's capable of critical thinking before only makes it worse.
>>64595802
>He probably saw the movie, enjoyed it for what it is, and hasn't thought about it since.
That's how star wars should and is mean't to be treated you dumbass.
Reminder: If you talk seriously about the extended universe of star wars and other nerd shit like that you are literally reddit.
>>64596062
I'm not implying. I'm flat out stating.
>>64596390
>objectively wrong
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
>That's how star wars should and is mean't to be treated you dumbass.
Not according to the faggots that make endless threads about this boring shit on /tv/ ten times a day.
>>64596062
I'd watch that porn
>>64595850
>you deserve backlash for sharing a retarded opinion on media
FTFY
>>64595910
He hates reboots and friday the 13th
>>64596545
What if it's a "soft reboot"?
>>64596545
which is why it's weird that he liked TFA when it's basically a soft-reboot of ANH
>>64596568
jinx
>>64596568
Are you disagreeing? What soft reboots (besides TFA I guess if you want to include that) has he liked?
>>64596463
And you'd be wrong.
>>64596656
the /tv/ motto
>>64596568
>>64596592
Heh nice
>>64596656
He's not, he only ever liked Empire and ANH to a much lesser extent
>>64596394
>just turn ur brain of lmao
>>64596694
b-but it's fun
Will these guys ever live down this objectively wrong TFA review? Answer: no.
>>64596688
So he's a star wars fan? Sounds like he likes Star Wars.
Anon's point about the art house and cult shit is still wrong too because Jay also loves things like Robocop.
>>64596740
maybe if they bash episode 8 enough
>>64595645
noone gives a fuck about jay 2bh senpai.
>>64596002
I don't think he has as strong of opinions on movies like Mike and Jay do.
>>64596394
I was pretty hapy for mike when he said he loved TFA. They took Star Trek away from him but gave Star Wars back C:
Mike's become a complete pleb
>>64596751
No, your point was that he was a HARDCORE star wars fan, he's not. A casual one at best.
>>64596786
He just thought it was okay.
>>64596831
You are on Plebs: the board
>>64596831
>become
>>64596835
I still draw a line between HARDCORE fan and autist. Jay knows the names of the aliens in his least favorite OT movie, that's some more advance knowledge.
>>64596783
STOP POSTING THIS DEAD AS FUCK NORMIE MEME YOU REDDIT KEK
>>64596835
Yeah I remember, he doesn't seem to feel strongly one way or the other most of the time he gets to talk during a movie.
>>64596872
well, I mean he used to criticize lazy cashgrabs alot more. If somethings not made by george lucas or adam sandler he pretty much always kinda likes it.
>>64596002
I like his honest take on comic book movies. His take on the new Spider-Man and Superman movies was spot on.
But his views are usually not great. At least not in the gaming world.
>>64596881
Thats a fair point, I think he liked Jedi a lot growing up but grew out of the series. They grew up around the toy boom of Star Wars and probably learned of it through osmosis, but thats probably a stretch.
That said he's probably grown out the series. Hes talked about how Empire props up SW.
>>64596928
>His take on the new Spider-Man and Superman movies was spot on
Spiderman yes, Superman no. He basically said he's not a fan of Superman at all so its pretty hard to care about his take on Man of steel.
>Plinkett review of Star Trek (2009)
>"Let me preface this by saying I don't think it's a bad movie"
Mike always sucked JJ's dick, he's just a big Star Trek nerd and not a true film critic. Their "reviews" are done as how a casual group of friends would discuss a movie; not as formal essays about why things are good or bad.
If that's what you want, the NY Times or LA Times has a film section for you.
>>64596928
>At least not in the gaming world.
He complains about games like an old man complains about society.
>Things were better in the old days!
It's understandable though. Some things were better back then.
>>64596983
Yeah, their show is entertainment just like the movies they view. Still think they're better critics than a lot of newspaper hacks because they have the capacity to enjoy action shit.
>>64596928
>At least not in the gaming world
thats actually where he shines. PreRec is the only gamerelated show I know, where they dont just parot popular opinion and point out modern trends as the fuckups they are
>>64596002
>hates the prequels
>hates Trump
Not like any patrician I've seen
>>64597072
>Screenshot from Half-Life: Opposing Force
>Named Doom 3
>>64596963
>Hes talked about how Empire props up SW.
I thought everyone knew that?
>>64595850
>work as a professional critic
>share your opinion with millions of people
>get upset when your opinions are scrutinized
Hi Mike!
>>64597217
Oh sure, well most sane people understand that. He was talking about how if Empire was similar in quality to ANH or JEDI we wouldn't have this huge series we have today.
>>64597103
Then obviously you are watching the right LP channels because most of the bigger guys get bank off saying good shit about those AAA games.
Wait what happened, what backlash
What did Mike do wrong
>>64597249
>he still thinks RLM gives a shit about what troglodytes on a chinese cartoon image board say about them
You seemed to miss the whole point of the "We're Disney shills reading from a script" part. They are making fun of people like YOU, and you still fell for it. What an absolute madman.
>>64597350
Like a movie.
>>64597378
Wait, wait, wait
People are mad that Mike liked the new Star Wars movie? What was wrong with it?
More importantly, people are MAD about an opinion?
>>64597350
hating TFA is the new /tv/ movies
This is full of 90's kids who grew up with the prequels
>>64596740
>Objectively wrong TFA review
I don't think you know what that even means.
>>64597514
>the new /tv/ movies
the fuck is wrong with my brain, wanted to say meme
>>64597530
I have my own understanding of the meaning.
>>64597162
>hates trump
Sauce
>>64596062
Honestly it would be pretty funny for one of their half in bags if they just filmed Mike arguing with himself about a movie for like twenty minutes.
>another RLM shill thread
do you get a free t-shirt if you keep posting this garbage here?
Nigger do you honestly think RLM gives half a damn about what people think about their reviews? The point of a review is to give a opinion and they did just that. What made it a "bad" review?
>>64597728
In response to >>64596740
>>64597755
I'm not even in this thread anymore
>>64597806
Ok good, I'm glad
Anybody know where I can watch their movies? Mostly curious about The Recovered as that's supposed to be their serious one.
>>64597363
Ah, so it was just another "ironically bad" video. Par for the course, Mike.
>>64597904
>http://redlettermedia.vhx.tv/
That's what you meant, right?
How many rupees do you earn per shill post, Rahjeet?
>>64597909
Nope, you're still being an idiot.
>>64597514
You know, its possible to hate the prequels AND criticize force awakens
>>64598021
Yes, it is also possible to hate the prequels AND enjoy force awakens.
It's also possible to enjoy the prequels AND enjoy the force awakens.
Or enjoy the prequels AND hate the force awakens.
Or even hate the prequels AND hate the force awakens.
>>64597728
Personally I thought it was a bad review because Mike's critiques of TFA are drastically inconsistent with the ones given to the other prequel films.
>glossing over the absurd commercialization that Mike lambasted Lucas over
>ignored the numerous plot-conveniences that Mike lambasted Lucas over
>didn't care about the insulting number of callbacks and """"""homages""""" that Mike lambasted Lucas over
etc.
>>64598083
But is it possible for love to bloom on the battlefield?
>>64598136
Ever wonder why Jay doesn't take his vast amount of filmmaking experience and branch out from RLM to create his own successful channel?
That's why.
>>64598136
>mfw I actually watched one of the videos
What the fuck is happening
>>64598121
He always genuinely praised Lucas for being a smart business man. At the end of the day when putting the movies side by side TFA works far better than the prequels
>>64598136
I remember the joke vlogs, can't believe I haven't seen that old stuff at the bottom though
>>64597162
>Hates Trump
I don't believe you. That means he hates Mike too.
Can Trump make Mike Plinkett again?
>>64598121
TFA answered every major criticism he ever had for the prequels. he'd be more of a hypocrite if he DIDN'T like it
all of the nitpicks in plinkett reviews were mostly just for comedic effect, those were not the real issues the films had. if that's what you focus on I'm afraid you'd missed the point entirely
>>64598121
His main problems with the prequels
>nonsensical, boring plots
>lack of proper characters to latch onto
>boring, stagnant direction
No matter what other complaints he has, those are the foundations of a movie, and all are failures in the prequels. When those elements fail, the entire film collapses.
TFA gets those main components right (IN MIKE'S OPINION just to clarify for the autists that don't understand how this works).
>>64598121
A lot of the things he criticized the prequels for are also problems with the campy, garbage OT, you inbred moron.
>/tv/ now believes that there is an exact science to what you are allowed to enjoy or hate, and that if you hated an element in one movie, it automatically you must hate any other movie that includes that element, regardless of the film's other elements
This place is so fucking stupid.
>>64598121
>missing the point of mike's speech on pottery in the aotc review
>>64597634
He's talked shit about him in the stream. No way I'm going to bother finding it for you. It's nothing interesting anyway.
Mike:
>I like dinosaurs, Jurassic World was awesome
>I like Han Solo, Force Awakens was awesome
He is just reviewing movies now based on how much he likes the subject matter, not the quality or originality of the plot.
>>64598136
>>64598763
>if I reduce a 30 minute discussion down to one vague talking point in greentext, it will appear I'm actually saying something critical
>>64596983
But Star Trek 2009 wasn't a bad movie.
Into Darkness was absolute horse shit.
>>64599107
Thats all he fucking did though. He ignored the lazy plot, the souless shit shoved in only to sell toys, and the fact that they palyed everything so god damn safe. In the crystal skull plinkett video he says he likes Temple of Doom alot because of how different it is from Raiders. I want Star Wars to have the balls to come up with something new.
>>64598421
>Mike is wildly inconsistent with his critique!
>"He was inconsistent before too!"
Thanks for agreeing with me I guess?
>>64599256
>In the crystal skull plinkett video he says he likes Temple of Doom alot because of how different it is from Raiders
And he also points out that Last Crusade was a good point in the franchise to play it safe. It's pretty easy to see that he felt after the disasters of the prequels, TFA was also a good point in the franchise to play it safe. You can't just cherry pick things Mike has said.
>>64598530
I expect professional reviewers to have some sort of method of objectivity. If they don't then their opinions cease to have value.
>>64599417
Dont compare Last Crusade to force awakens, they arent even close in terms of quality.
>>64599471
You're not even trying to follow the conversation
>>64599207
>But Star Trek 2009 wasn't a bad movie.
It was meh, just like TFA. I'd say TFA is better for not having a horrible timetravel plot and less lens flare.
>>64599471
Okay. You're missing the point.
>>64597162
>thinking anyone but illiterate flyovers think Trump is anything but satire come to life
Why can't Mike just write a list of rules for movies and then use it to objectively score each movie on HITB? I find his episode-to-episode subjectivity almost as maddening as their tiresome need to make jokes and gags.
To anyone in this thread that is too autistic to understand why Mike would enjoy TFA: watch Plinkett's Star Trek 09 review. His same ideas and feelings apply.
Awww did we not like the reactions of people with didn't views than you own.
booo-hoo.
>>64596983
Idk they shit on Into Darkness for its stupid ass plot
>>64599497
>>64599508
I get the point. But Force awakens was not a very good movie, and most critics praising it so much really bothers me. If episode 8 is basically a remake of Empire Strikes back will they praise that too?
>>64599512
Holy shit is this post a joke?
what backlash exactly la familia?
>>64599557
They praised Last Crusade, and if /tv/ were around then they would be calling it derivative unoriginal trash too
>>64599599
What do you think, Captain Autismo?
>>64597956
*tip
>>64599650
Inianda Jones isnt really a continuing saga like Star Wars is. Indiana Jones movies are more stand alone adventure movies. I can name dozens of original things from Last crusade but barely anything in force awakens. If you like force awakens so much, tell me specifically why
>>64599510
Hello reddit
>>64599772
Hello IQ of 69.
>>64599557
>most critics praising it so much really bothers me
Boo fucking hoo. Why would it bother you so much? Quit being a whiny pussy.
>>64599836
>Quit being a whiny pussy
Im sure you've never complained about a movie on /tv/
>>64599886
Not about something this worthless.
>>64598181
>>64598186
Were you newfags not around for Jay's daily vlogs?
There was a thread on /tv/ everyday for them. He made them as a joke after fans suggested that RLM start doing vlogs like other popular youtubers.
He talked about it extensively in one of the twitch streams. Step up your RLM fandom, fags
>>64595645
he's not Plinkett
Are these faggots like /tv/ giant bomb?
They have at least one thread every time I visit.
>>64596626
Star Trek 09
>>64600575
More low effort, "ironically bad" videos from RLM?
No WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY
>>64602257
Jays vlogs don't really have anything to do with RLM. they're basically just trolling. And they still have more effort put into them than trolling on /tv/.
>>64596002
Rich is the most patrician but also one of the most aspie.
Rich having his own reviews would be like having a patrician Wizard have his own reviews. And no one wants to see that
>>64603980
Rich is an annoying fat fuck.
He says things like "Im such a nerd xD" when playing a star wars game and such. He's just a fat fucking loser
>>64604046
>fat fucking loser
he's a nerd
>>64596694
*tips fedora*
>>64596002
>fat nerd goes off on his own nerdy tangents
>gets pissy when mike doesn't let him
>someone in twitch chat knows more than him on any fictional media
>LOL YOU FUCKING NERD
Rich is the biggest hypocrite on RLM.
>>64604306
>what is self deprication?
>>64604362
You apparently don't know.
Rich is someone that thinks his nerd shit don't stink while calling other people nerds. It's probably from being friends with Mike or a desperate attempt at self-esteem.
>>64604460
Yep, that's definitely it. It couldn't be your own faggot projection at all.
>>64604587
Holy shit you're fucking devoted to them, aren't you?
>>64595645
literally who?
>>64604986
>You're pointing out my autism. You must wanna suck their dicks!
>>64605108
He's right. You are a devoted fuccboi.
>my e-friends can do no wrong
Kill yourself. Rich Evans has a girlfriend and he's a digusting balding slob. Maybe if you didnt spend your days rewatching on their content you could get one too.
>>64605108
>it's autistic to recognize basic human emotions and motivations
Keep going, I'm laughing my ass off.
I bet you subscribe to Pre-Rec on twitch too.
>>64596390
>Mike's opinion is objectively wrong
You can not have wrong opinions. If you could they wouldn't be opinions
