I N S T I T U T I O N A L
H U M I L I A T I O N
>2,000 positive reviews (blue pilled)
>900 negative (red pilled)
>Meanwhile the well paid, shill critics are 100% positive
>>64589866
wow, that's pretty telling. Typically, aren't "fan/layperson reviews" more lenient than critics' reviews?
>>64589815
>hyperbolic /v/ review
>>64589866
>polshit proving my point
It wasn't great but it wasn't that bad.
>>64589938
Loads of movies critics are just fanboys with their own sites now. How else can every big budget superhero, sci-fi action, and fantasy movie get 80-90% on RT?
>user reviews
Reminder that The Tree of Life has the same imdb score as Attack of the Clones, and Moby-Dick has a lower goodreads score than Twilight
>>64589815
>i dont like TFA
>therefore prequels are now great and I was blind
>>64590255
Yeah, that goes a long way toward explaining why so many mediocre movies get 85% + ratings
>>64589815
If you're using user reviews to justify your position, you've already lost.
>>64589938
Metacritc is a megaphone for cry babies. Read reviews the user reviews for Metal Gear Solid V
>>64589815
I still don't get the prequel hate. They had some cheese, but they were generally pretty ok
>>64590373
This reviewer isn't wrong though
>>64589815
Brutally efficient review.
A Disney executive must have read this and Jewed his way to 10 drones posting good reviews.
>>64589815
>someone doesnt agree with you
>shill
>>64590373
>>64590421
GTFO of 4chan Disney-shill
>>64589815
>>64589815
>crashing
Okay who did this?
>>64590373
Yeah, because critic reviews and tripfag reviews are totally more objective.
God this is getting sad
>>64590455
The film isn't a 2/10. That's absurdly hyperbolic
>>64589815
Looks good to me.
>>64589815
>Wah I have a different standard for this movie than any other Hollywood movie cause reasons
>Wah Why can't Tarkovsky direct Starwars!?!?
>Wah the Mary Sue and coincidences won't stand the test of time.
>Ps I don't know what Indiana Jones is.
Was is a derivative piece of schlock garbage? Yes, but so is anything else made for more than 5 million dollars.
Fuck off you fuckng contrarians,
>>64590559
TRIPFAG SHILLS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>64590559
Respect that you're still trying to reason with this board.
>>64590559
5.5/10
>>64590584
either autistic or a shill
>>64590553
Critics are typically better judges of a film's worth, yes. They watch enough to have a proper contextual understanding of that works place within its medium
>>64590574
>nigger
>king of /tv/
Now, I know where all blackd and cuck memes come from.
>>64590216
>It wasn't great but it wasn't that bad.
It's not /pol/, retard. it's the truth. You'll open your eyes one day to media's manipulation.
>>64590630
Yup, which is why Armond White, Roger Moore and others have dissed the film.
>>64590635
>Armond
>nigger
Samuel jackson is a nigger. Mr. White is a fine gentleman.
>>64590559
Quit while you're ahead, buddy. You always struck me as a half-virgin pretentious jerk-off I could beat up blinded with a single arm free, but now you're bordering the autismo line.
Stop. Trust me when I say this comes from a place of love. Stop.
>>64590737
>there are only two film critics in the entire world
Are you seriously going to argue that the film isn't critically well-received?
>>64590635
>Now, I know where all blackd and cuck memes come from
So you're essentially admitting you're a tourist
what kind of fucking retards rate film on a 1-10 scale
TFA was 2-2.5 stars.
>>64589866
>hating something makes you red pilled
It seems like RT scores are getting more and more bloated and meaningless. Why could this be? Are production houses wizening up to the formula and gaming the system better now that they know that people are looking to places like Metacritic and RT for absolute opinions?
>>64590765
>tripfag caring that other tripfag is making himself look like a mong
Aren't you sweet
>>64590584
kill yourself shill
>>64590559
TRIPFAG DISNEY CUMGUZZLERS ON SUDOKU WATCH
>>64590601
>Hurr Durr autistic shills
Nice refutation btw.
I'd show you the way to Reddit,But you can just follow your trail of breadcrumbs
>>64590780
Are you seriously going to argue that having the majority of critics and audiences rate the film highly automatically means it's great?
>>64590824
Such a striking figure.
>>64589815
Savage, but gave me a hard on.
Anything that makes Disney panic enough to hire 50 Metacritic drones to vote 10/10 is priceless.
>>64590765
How much do you bench?
>>64590786
Yes I come from /v/ but usually lurk /tv/ for capeshit movies, I tried /co/, but they rarely talk about them, they prefer talking baout the comic books
>>64590765
[2]
>>64590844
Not only that but knowing Disney's practices and the jewish way of doing things. Ask Tarantino, he spoke quite well of it on the Howard Stern show.
Critics reviews mean nothing when Disney can bully, lobby and intimidate everyone they want.
>>64590635
Armond is an honorary white, you scummy pleb. Don't you ever insult him again or I'll fucking slaughter you.
>>64589815
No one cares what you thought of the movie, faggot. This isn't your blog. Fuck off.
>>64590917
t. I couldn't prop up TFA in 4chan
>>64590635
Don't you ever respond to me again unless you're contributing to the thread.
>>64590844
I wasn't arguing that a good RT score automatically indicates a good film, but it's still a much better indicator than fucking user reviews by hormonal fanboys
>>64590584
>le contrarian meme
oh, you wacky plebs!!
>>64590913
>Armond is an honorary white
I bet your wife and her son say the same thing.
>2/10
http://www.theonion.com/article/fan-just-going-keep-open-mind-about-whether-new-st-52062
>>64590938
By what metric? Your own arbitrary criteria, crafted around your obsessive-compulsive devotion to defending The Force Awakens?
>>64590630
using multisyllabic words after the fact does not justify an appeal to authority. There is zero merit in the argument that "the critics like it, so it's good." You should've moved past that idea at 18-19 years old.
>>64589815
BASED
A
S
E
D
>>64590874
136 kilos. Soon it'll be more if I keep it up.
Why don't we skip the foreplay and you ask directly what size my dick is, bro? I won't judge you.
>>64590984
It was legitimately a 2/10 as a Star Wars film though. Right below AoTC.
Sorry if that ruins your delusion.
>>64591007
>136 kilos
lmao what is this your first week at the gym
>>64590913
This.
>RT scores
>relevant
>>64590986
Fuck you, you pick and choose what mobies deserve what ratings, if you picked a movie you liked that had low user ratings you'd say it were pleb opinions and so on.
Its people needlessly devoted to proving how bad TFA is.
>>64591125
TFA shills BTFO
>>64591125
S A V A G E
>>64591143
>Fuck you, you pick and choose what mobies deserve what ratings, if you picked a movie you liked that had low user ratings you'd say it were pleb opinions and so on.
Uh-huh. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion. Pretending your opinion is objectively correct because some critics and the general public agree with it, however, is extreme idiocy achievable only by a disney shill.
>>64591125
>sharp humor, relatable characters and hilarious work from amy schumer
>>64590988
>>64590986
When you read Ulysses and all of the Catholic philosophy references go over your head and you start reading explanatory notes online, do you trust the judgement of someone who's read thousands of books and has a doctorate in Irish literature, or the judgement of some random user on goodreads? Not to compare JJ to Joyce, but people whose job it is to judge a film often have more insightful critiques than either you or I do because it's their fucking job to
>>64589815
SPIRITUAL DISASTER
>>64590939
You are a bunch on contrarians though. Next door neighbour to the edgelord.
Like I said, what would have made you like It? If Tarkovsky directed it? Maybe Mallick could set up a few shots? Would you like it if Von Triar stopped by to fix the white balance?
The movie wasn't any worse than some shit movie like Jupiter Ascending, and you didn't fucking talk about how shitty that was for 3 weeks, Brandon.
It's Hollywood, not high art.
>>64591197
Pretty much. So why even bring up ratings in the first place, it could have perfect ratings across the board and /tv/ wouldn't give a shit
>>64591235
I didn't bring them up, JMDFYS did.
>>64591233
>what could have made you like it
I don't know, how about it being a good movie?
What kind of fucking defence is that?
>>64591007
How many roofies did you put in her drink you neanderthal
>>64591007
stop being such a prick to Jeff, he's ok-ish
>>64591218
It should be clear from reading just about any review that a great deal of film "critics" do not, in fact, have doctorates in film theory or know particularly more about film than the average cinephile.
>>64589866
You're mistaking ratings with reviews. Only 30% of reviews are positive.
>>64589866
This
>>64591007
>136k
You know you can lie on the internet, right? No one's ever going to find out.
>>64591298
>you neanderthal
is not an insult, you nigger
>>64591360
>Lie
If I was lying I would've said 150 or more. You think 136kg is a lot? Oh wow, you really are a weakling, man.
Sorry.
>>64591233
OT was high art though.
It was a Zen Buddhist Space Opera which BTFO Judeo Christian belief of posession and attachment to anything.
Original Trilogy was AS (if not more) intelligent as it was fun. That was what made it special.
TFA is a cancerous clone derivative that JJ hastily jumbled together for the millennial (aka YOU) generations empty brain and tasteless palate.
>>64591310
And yet they still have a larger base of understanding than average joe. I've never read a single insightful user review of a film, while occasionally the New Yorker writes something that'll enhance my enjoyment of a particular movie by detailing something that went over my head
>>64591218
Looking to a few *legitimately erudite and esteemed* film critics to gain a deeper understanding is perfectly fine. But looking at aggregate scores of unwashed critic masses' opinion of a widely released blockbuster doesn't really tell us about the film's quality. It really just tells us about how wide the movie's appeal is, how much it is likely to please the typical, casual audience.
>>64591360
but its 300lbs
you think that's a lot for a bench press? you can do it after a year and a half at the gym
unless we're talking about several reps, but I doubt it
>>64591280
That's your review?
>Make it better
I'll send the notes to JJ, I'm sure Ep. 8 will be more to your taste thanks to your input.
Dolt.
>>64591497
>after a year and a half
If you're on gear maybe. What the fuck kind of gym do you go to?
>>64589815
Can we all finally agree that the prequels were better than TFA?
>>64591484
>New Yorker
>http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-george-awakens
>>64591428
>>64591497
Who said it was a lot?
>>64591484
You being stupider than the average New Yorker writer doesn't magically turn critics into infallible film theory gods.
>>64591552
how much do you bench, tough guy?
>>64591428
136 could be alot depending on your height and body shape, for a girl 136 is a fucking landwhale status despite height, age or physical condition. For a manlet is a lot if they are not very muscular and with a wide torso. For a normal guy is alot only if he's a fatso, for a tall guy it can be a lot only if he has weird body shape like a pear or a chicken.
>>64591539
Unfortunately yes.
I never thought I'd say this, but after TFA, Phantom Menace looks passionate as far as mythos building goes.
>>64589815
>Only now at the end do they realize
AbsofuckinglutelyBASED
>>64591552
Tripfags disgust me. Why not use reddit instead? I'm not memeing you with le leddit meme, I'm genuinely curious.
>>64591541
I read it. It's just a contrite apology to Lucas with some tempered praise for JJ.
>>64591481
First, I didn't even like the movie, and called it shit a hundred times.
Second
>Muh millenials
Who gives a shit if the OT promoted Buddhist lessons And BTFO Judeo Christians teachings. if I wanted that I'd watch the newest episode of The Simpsons
I refuse to accept the idea that the OT is high art, cause of some Buddhist wankery.
>>64589938
never for anything artsy at least
>>64591552
Your reaction.
>>64591603
I'm 1.85m tall. I stopped lifting for a while, that's why I want to be able to bench around 170 by November and why I'm not content with 136. The guy who coaches gave me a weird look when I told him that was my goal, but he'll help nonetheless.
>>64591481
>cancerous clone
The only thing related to cancer and clones in regards to Star Wars are the prequel films.
>Original Trilogy was as intelligent as it was fun
What? Those films are pretty straight forward. Certainly there's something to be said about the mysticism and sense of magic that permeates those films, but that atmosphere all gets thrown out in the prequel films anyway.
>>64590843
you seem to know a lot about reddit, maybe its because youre from there
>>64591653
First valid point made by a TFA contrarian.
>>64591541
>alien resurrection
>a lesser alien film
stopped reading here
>>64591592
No one suggested that they were. I said that they're a better indicator than cheeto-dusted fanboys calling a competently made film the worst thing to ever happen to cinema
>>64589815
>1138 coincidences
That cheeky cunt.
>>64590446
>>64591751
nou
>>64591653
people want validation. autists dont understand the point of being anonymous
>>64591719
>170 kg by November
You should really tone it down with that kind of shit, you'll cripple yourself. This kind of thing takes years to develop, not a few months.
Either that or go on a cycle.
>>64589815
Can't say I appreciate ranting much in reviews but this is pretty spot on.
>>64591697
>>64591727
No one is saying the Prequels are gold.
Redpilled are saying instead this:
THAT TFA IS SO SHIT, IT IS ACTUALLY WORSE THAN THE SHIT THAT WAS AOTC or RoTS.
Imagine... the shit your father shits, and the bloody shit a recovering ebola patient in Sierra Leone shits.
Prequels are formet, TFA is the latter
Capisi?
>>64591778
Nice job cherrypicking user reviews to group all negative reviews under the "cheeto-dusted fanboys" label and deride their criticisms as a "worst thing to ever happen to cinema" strawman.
I'm sure I could cherrypick film critics and make them all look like idiots too. Hell, Ebert already did half the job for me.
>>64590765
hey do you still pretend you're white?
>>64590489
based Jim twisting the blade on that Kike manlet piece of shit.
>>64591719
I already bench 170 kg you little cuck
>>64591539
Depends, they fail at different things but the prequels were defiinitely Star Wars although burried under loads of crap, TFA is just an uninspired and insipid bootleg.
>>64590446
Are we talking about the same prequels?
IMO they were terrible, original but terrible. TFA is a cliche soulless film, unoriginal, repetitive and predictable, however it was better than prequels in terms of FX, acting, dialogue, basically in everything.
>think about the worst movie they could possibly make for a star wars sequel
>it looks exactly like TFA
it is that bad
>1138 coincidences
Like Luke being Vader's son and Leia's brother? Like Vader building C3PO? Like R2D2 belonging to Obi-Wan? Star Wars IS coincidences. Prequel apologists are fucking trash
>>64591823
No. You're wrong. I don't care, how red you think your pill is. You have no arguments to compliment your shit analogy.
You've made no case as to why you're right. And my theory, is that it's cause you're wrong.
>>64591887
It's a moot point that it's not hard to top the prequels on acting/dialogue/FX though, right? That's not what the fanbase wanted alone. We wanted a new Star Wars. This wasn't new at all.
If we suck disney's cock over this rehash fest they're only going to continue to rehash.
>>64589815
Too harsh. It's solidly in the 6.8 - 7.4/10 range.
>>64591823
>>64591924
TFA shill BTFO
>>64591823
>THAT TFA IS SO SHIT, IT IS ACTUALLY WORSE THAN THE SHIT THAT WAS AOTC or RoTS
But it's not, and the people saying that sort of immediately invalidate any other opinions they might hold.
>>64591858
What the fuck did you just say to me you little bitch?
>>64591954
I could have agreed with you on 6/10 IF Rey wasn't an utter Mary Sue or Luke was in the film 8 total seconds.
OR
THE
FUCKING
ALIAS
HELICOPTER
SHOT
WAS
NOT
THE
GODDAMN
ENDING
FRAME
>>64590559
Jurassic World was 5/10 and was much worse than TFA, TFA just happens to be a bad SW movie.
"It rehashed too much"
"WHERE WAS LUKE?"
Prequel-babbies are hilarious.
>>64589815
The idea that Starkiller Base bullshit with JJ planet destruction derivative porn was in the movie subtracts an irreversible 4 out of 10 from the get go.
Tragic.
I can see it dropping to 3/10 or 4/10 with all the coincidences and the Poe disappearance bullshit or Kanjiklub Star Trek scene or ridiculous Luke witholding etc. etc. etc.
The fact that TFA was allowed by Disney executives to be finished with SUCH a shit script is proof that Disney is killing the art form of film.
Dreaming of galaxies far, far away in cinemas nearby. Crowds gasp in amazement swinging their hands along with lightsaber movements. Alas, the audience's awe is uninspired. Just like Kylo Ren walks and talks Darth Vader but is afraid he will not surpass his supremacy, Star Wars: The Force Awakens is afraid of treading treading uncharted territory fearing it will not live up to the expectations set by the original trilogy. As a consequence its universe provides nothing but an ersatz adventure.
The banality of the blockbuster serves to suppress the audience's capacity for imagination of better worlds to come. Cool artifice replaces reality. As a spectacle the blockbuster reaches its apex when its whole is self-contained: nothing but images referring to other images of popular culture. In Star Wars: The Force Awakens the universe created is a hodge-podge of familiar elements of its franchise's former glory days. For instance, Rey, who ostensibly is the new Luke Skywalker, originates from a desert planet abandoned by family just as Luke was. The Empire is now called the First Order, ruled by a Sith Lord identical to the Emperor and is still intent on building planet-destroying superweapons containing one fatal construction flaw. Han Solo returns the way the fans were hoping for: flying the Millenium Falcon with Chewie. Sadness of his death stems more from the disappearance of a fan-favorite character than from a tragic narrative.
>>64592049
>Luke
>prequel babby
Go to bed underage. Men will handle this.
>>64592107
Mired in self-references, the film ultimately signifies nothing. Its world is a poor substitute of man's innate sense of discovery. Where the literature of J.R.R. Tolkien fills the reader with a sense of wonder, Star Wars: The Force Awakens embodies the estrangement of man in his self-shaped artifice. The creatures wandering about come over as nonsensical and a mere sign of inter-space relations. More importantly, advanced technology is elevated to the fantastical, taking the place of man and nature as the source of all worship. Technique is shown to be a worthy ruler. Megalomaniac spaceships, each one bigger than the other, reveal our complex society's preoccupation with technological advancement. The Star Destroyer is its ultimate fetish.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens is propaganda of seriousness (as defined by Johan Huizinga) in its most deceptive form. The viewer becomes trapped in its numerous winks to the Golden Oldies. He sublimates his innate alienation living in a technical world of artifice into an ersatz adventure. When he leaves the cinema, his critical faculties are weakened. Instead of being awakened, prompted to use his life force, he is lulled to sleep.
>>64591833
They do a good job of living up to the cliché. A tempered critique of the force awakens would be laudable. A 2/10 "worse than the prequels" is someone with a bone to pick. Probably an EU twat, or the sort of contrarian memer that despised Avatar and Titanic once they broke every box office record, or a disgruntled Trekker who's still upset that JJ made the first watchable film in the franchise in over a decade. TFA is tailor made to be hated, and it has nothing to do with the quality of the film itself
>>64592049
Let's be honest, most went to see the movie not for the quality but for Hamill/Ford.
>>64592124
>Go to bed underage. Men will handle this.
Referring to these people being the same people claiming that the prequels were superior. Nobody is arguing that TFA is better than the original films.
>>64592003
These are valid criticisms, but you're ignoring things like good fundamentals.
It's still a movie with a coherent story (if stupid and recycled), good cinematography and effects, good acting (even if the characters are weak) and good pacing, all in all.
It's basically part of the group called the modern whedonesque capeshit movie.
>>64592088
What the fuck is wrong with not giving us more Luke?
anyone rating it more than 6/10 is a retard and a pleb
TFA is a Disney meme and a joke. It is NOT a Star Wars.
It is a parody of it
BRAVO JJ
>>64592177
I'll make it simple for a retrograde intelligence such as yourself:
If you've liked TFA more than any of the prequels, you are part of the problem. You are precisely the symbiotic parasite to JJ's opportunistic infection. You are no different than those who declared Phantom Menace "best star wars ever" 1 week after release.
Oh sorry.. .You were still shitting in your diapers back then no?
>>64592031
>Jurassic World was 5/10 and was much worse than TFA
The point it is it felt like a new movie and a sequel. TFA feels like a forced shoehorned thing and really like a rehashed movie.
>>64592088
>all the coincidences
Could be alright if they weren't so fucking big.
>Poe disappearance bullshit
What was the point of his character again?
>Kanjiklub
Wait for him to be the new Jabba in episode IX.
>ridiculous Luke witholding
Ending such crappy movie with a jewish cliffhanger is absolutely unacceptable.
>>64592217
I think many guessed right that Abrams feared he would distract from the insipid new characters.
>>64589815
>http://www.metacritic.com/movie/avengers-age-of-ultron/user-reviews
Age Of Ultron has better user reviews than this flaming turd
>>64592248
>Jurassic World
>it felt like a new movie
>>64592199
>good pacing
>that pointless freighter sequence
>good cinematography
No, it's passable cinematography. You're right when you call it the "modern whedonesque capeshit movie"; since Whedon himself is infamous for his terrible cinematography.
>>64592234
>If you've liked TFA more than any of the prequels, you are part of the problem.
I rest my case.
>>64592217
Every OT fan attended the movie for Luke's mastery era.
Not fucking flat chested cunt, or manlet big ass nigger, or the 4 foot tall spic.
JJ then spits on your face by literally trolling the audience by placing Luke WITHOUT DIALOGUE in the final 8 seconds.
He should be raped, murdered-- only after bearing witness to the cannibalization of his children and wife, just to equal the BILLION strong disappointment he caused.
Of course everyone will watch a Star Wars film. Even if it is shit.
The problem is that it was derivative and will be forgotten in 5 years, beyond prequel levels.
>>64592281
Kylo Ren is a more interesting character than everyone in the prequels combined.
>>64592327
Luke would've ruined the movie. JJ is smarter than you are so he understood this.
>>64592336
So was Dooku. A great idea of an aristocratic direct padawan of Yoda. He didn't save AoTC though buddy. Nope.
Nice logical fallacy though.
>>64592336
>Le emo fanboi
>interesting
>>64592248
Jurassic World is as much a remake as TFA
>>64592336
FAG
>>64592336
Hi man.
You also watch and enjoy anime don't you?
>>64592386
You don't understand what a logical fallacy is. Stop using terms you don't understand.
>>64592373
JJ ruined the movie, not Luke
>>64592336
>Kylo Ren
>Intersting
I don't want to imply you're wrong, but I'm genuinely curious what you find "interesting" about him.
The only think I find "interesting" although it's more of a curiosity, is why he has such a hard-on for grandpa dearest. And that's not the movie establishing him as an interesting character, that's just the movie refusing to give us context.
If there's some other thing about him that makes him interesting, do tell me though, I'd like to start liking this new trilogy before the cynicism sets in permanently.
>>64592396
>>64592406
Could you be more pleb? Kylo is a better villain than Vader
>>64592436
>I was BTFO by the argument
>I-- I'LL SHOW HIM
Nice try kiddo. Go to bed.
>>64592336
For the cinematically illiterate
>>64591975
>that stupid fucking gif
>>64592336
--for the reddit millennial
>the only way TFA-fags can enjoy their movie is to hate on the prequels
Typical, they have nothing else, poor fanbase
>>64592441
>ancestor-worshipping villain whose insecurity leads him put on the facade of a badass when he's actually just a frightened Vadet cosplsyer
>school shooter who's emotionally unstable
>kills his father to avoid being seduced by the light by his family like Vader was
He has a lot going on
>>64592336
--for the repressed trap masturbating flaming Massachusets homosexual
>>64592336
--for those who know any Linkin Park lyrics at all
>>64592336
-- for those who stay in line for capeshit opening days
>>64590635
Get the fuck out and don't come back
>>64592614
>>64592649
Literally the same fag
>>64592702
>>64592649
>>64592614
>>64592576
>>64592551
You did it guys! You beat his argument with the power of memes!
>>64592726
>>64592744
Leave /tv/ JJ cumguzzler
Now.
>>64592812
Well, at least cumguzzler isn't a meme.
>>64592812
Jesus.. George hated TFA didn't he.
Wow.
>>64589815
Judging by the amount of chanspeak in that review I'm guessing OP wrote it or it was plagiarized from /tv/ shitposting
>>64592812
JJ Abrams has directed 3 good movies, George Lucas has directed 1. George Lucas is the Ringo Starr of Hollywood, his shitty movie was saved in editing and suddenly he's rich and famous
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-vii---the-force-awakens/critic-reviews
>>64592995
Date doesn't match the vitriolic increase of TFA hate here for the past 2 weeks.
>>64592612
All three of these are assumptions though.
Closest you have to it, is the emotionally unstable bit, but for all we know, his behaviour is just as likely a result of Snoke being a vengeful master, as him being emotionally unstable or aiming high. Nothing in the movie (to my memory) confirms his character to be either of these.
>>64592942
White slavers.
>>64592812
is this a
>hey guys
or a
>eeh i'm outta here
>>64593019
>JJ
>3
>Good
>Movies
JJ can only direct flicks, and he has zero good ones.
>>64593019
Kill yourself.
Im sincerely, deeply, truly, serious.
>>64593040
Holy shit you can't even discern the most basic character traits and implied backstory. Are all TFA detractors this clueless?
>the prequels werent that bad guys
Post TFA /tv/ has been amazing. The lengths some people here will go to be contrarian to the current popular thing is so much fun to watch.
>>64593072
09 Star Trek is the second best Star Wars film
>>64589815
>shills
OP don't be an attention whore and post your own review here
>>64590373
>The Tree of Life has the same imdb score as Attack of the Clones
working as intended
>>64593142
>"It looks like it, but that doesn't mean it's established as it's at most implied, along with other alternatives."
>"Dude, you can't even see what it looks like?"
Reading comprehension.
>>64593218
You must be new here.
Now please fuck off.
>>64593019
>3 good movies
I'm not in any way defending Lucas, but wow, you are delusional. JJ has directed one good movie, at best. And that's only if you take the best parts of all of his films and try to cobble together a new film out of that.
>>64593183
It's a meme and not a funny one.
>>64593954
>>64593183
die TFA shills
stop breathing
get killed
your life should end
die
die die
>>64591932
beats out titanic
didney rehashes the rest of the ot
>>64592440
fucking this
>>64589815
brutal famiglia... fucking brutal
>>64590489
based
>>64590574
Denzel is the king of /tv/? Wat
>>64590216
So we should just settle for mediocre now? It wasn't even a mediocre film it was down right bad.
>>64590459
I find myself agreeing with it completely as much as I don't want too. I keep trying to convince myself that some of it was good but it just wasn't
>>64596237
Same pit of my stomach disappointment here bro.
Sad.
>>64589815
Literally what I would have written.
>scale rating
>star rating
>any kind of numerical rating rather than a small essay
How_to_spot_plebs.jpg
