Why would one waste his/her genius on film? It will never be considered real art and deservedly so. Sorry Tark, you died for nothing.
he didnt waste nothing, his films are crap
>>64561674
>he didn't waste nothing
so he wasted something?
>>64561703
>>64561674
all films are crap, it's not real art
>>64561825
Fwiw, only pretentious tryhard arthouse films are useless garbage. An honest fun flick can help you kill your boredom somtimes.
>>64561752
Hey man no need to be mean about it, just trying to help a mate improve his english.
>>64561272
>just bought Tarks book today
feels good family
Film has the potential to be the second greatest artistic medium, second only to vidya
As of January 6 2016, literature is the most accomplished medium, tho
>>64563888
Kill yourself. Film will never surpass the exhaustive content of literature. Vidya has never produced any good art, it's a medium for entertainment.
>>64561272
A movie that isn't entertaining is pointless, Tarkovsky's entire filmography is a waste.
>>64564537
Go watch some capeshit then
>>64564537
idiot
>>64561272
What's real art?
>>64564275
What's good art?
