http://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-vii---the-force-awakens/user-reviews
The entire frontpage is now filled with positive reviews with impossible 100% approval. Couple of days ago it there were only negarive reviews.
That's Sheev-tastic
Damage controling so hard motherfuckers want to find 'em.
>metacritic scores are being manipulated
NO
WAY
>>64555924
Jesus Christ
>>64555924
>GUYS IT'S NOT AS BAD AS THE PREQUELS
If your highest compliment is that it's better than something you hate, then that's not much.
>>64555924
>An absolute masterpiece of movie making magic
the fuck
>>64555918
This.
> metacritic review scores are either 10 or 0
its autism central. explains a lot why you go there OP.
>Disney milking every last cent out of their shit movie
How shocking
>>64556041
You're either like the movie or you don't. The 10 scale is an illusion.
>>64555918
>>64556041
pretty much
if it was all 0s you'd be freaking out how TFA is getting BTFO
>>64556174
> being this simple.
prepare to be confused.
what if I like the soundtrack and cinematography but not the acting of half of the cast?
do I like the film?
>>64556276
For the most part they are irrelevant to liking the movie. Movies are more then the sum of it's parts. What matters is the experience. If you really loved a movie that have bland score, you're eventually going to unironically learn to love it's score too.
>>64555924
>>64555924
>>64555884
*fine em.
>>64555848
>metacritic
lol
>>64557023
>>64557076
>posters count doesn't increase
>>64557461
>I am autistic
>all that damage control
>still only 6.9/10
It's over, it's all downhill for Disney and SW from here.
>>64555924
disgusting desu
>>64556276
>hat if I like the soundtrack and cinematography but not the acting of half of the cast?
then an x/10 scale is even more useless for expressing what you actually think
>Couple of days ago it there were only negarive reviews.
does anybody have a cap to confirm this
>>64557694
Maybe Internet Archive saves it?
>>64555848
>implying Disney gives a shit about metacritic scores
The movie's already sold more than any other in existence and the next few will do the same.
Publishers only care about metacritic scores when they're worried about sales
>>64558766
Except Avatar and Titanic.
>>64558766
Kill yourself kid
Disney realized it won't even be passing Titanic worldwide-- so they are in FULL DAMAGE CONTROL
TOP FUCKING KEK
>>64555924
>>64558766
>being this stupid
They have plans for splashing one Star Wars movie a year for at least 5 years.
Tell me how TFA's score won't affect future movie sales.
I'm not saying they pay critics to give them good reviews because I don't know. But there have been cases of media manipulation before. It wouldn't surprise me.
Mostly because you check professional critic scores and it almost averages a 10, and then user reviews in many sites are all around 7.
>Save the franchise, Rian Johnson, you're our only hope!
>all this backslapping for TFA
>Miss him yet?
http://youtu.be/6ncFCndCLG8
>User score 6.9 / 10
>Just on top of Spectre
>Negative + mixed reviews outnumber positive reviews
>0 bad reviews from "critics"
Top kek. They can't hide the truth.
This is an impressive bad score, because TFA has more or less just been released.
It only goes downhill from here. I'm guessing a 5.8 or 6.1 average in the future
Bump for Glibly Facsimiling the OT
>>64559017
S A V A G E
Wait I'm so confused. I personally didn't care for it as a Star Wars movie, but even those who did concede that the movie had its flaws. How the FUCK is this movie getting 10/10 from anyone? It isn't anywhere near the ranks of any "great" movies, and even if you say you loved, there's got to be no way you see the movie as perfect. Is there???
>the new Man of Steel
Welcome to 2016.
>>64555848
Craaaaawliiing in my skiiiiiiin these woonds wilnot heyool
2 billion dollaroos soon mothafuckas. Aint nothin you can do about it but post salty threads.
>>64561739
Some people on metacritic give scores based on moving the averaged score in their direction, so people will give something a 10 or a 0 to counter people giving it 0 or 10.
Why are you asking why there are 10s but not asking how anyone could give it a 0?
>>64561739
Star Wars fags will rate it a 10/10 just because it's Star Wars especially if they hear about negative/bad/low reviews somewhere because they are incapable of believing it could be anything else than 10/10 so they will send out the Star Wars alarm and come out in force (no pun intended) to bump up the ratings
>>64564703
>salty
go back to LoL lifeless fat loser fuck
>>64565345
Have you forgotten about us EU fags? We didn't forget. Fear our 0 reviews!
PS, why did that one stormtrooper have the staff that could deflect lightsabers? There is literally no reason to have that. Guess they'll have to use EU to explain it.
>>64559017
What an autistic review. Ford played his role fine.
>>64556276
Don't vote then
>>64555924
they read as generic as payed amazon reviews
>>64565801
EU already has electro weapons that can block sabers. It wasn't a new idea. JJ doesn't do new ideas.
>>64559017
Ford and Fisher were already phoning it in by Return of the Jedi.
>>64566435
Not that anon, but the annoying part of the anti-saber baton was how it was a random stormtrooper who had it. It should have been Phasma, she's already the special trooper, then she would come with her special elite weaponry. But then it would involve either Finn or Solo killing her, and that would not be politically correct.
>>64559017
best review on TFA I've seen.
JJ BTFO
>>64559017
>1138 coincidences
kek
>>64566435
m8 even RotS has them, because they are used in a war against jedi
In TFA jedi have been all but extinct for 50 years
>>64566435
That's the point. Everyone said that was shit when it was in the EU, but when they pretended to make it up for the movie everyone is blowing their loads over it.
>>64567384
oh yeah, pic related
Any else think TR8-TOR deserves his own spin off?
>>64565801
>There is literally no reason to have that.
Luke Skywalker has vanished.
In his absence, the sinister
FIRST ORDER has risen from
the ashes of the Empire
and will not rest until
Skywalker, the last Jedi,
has been destroyed.
Lightsaber resistant riot gear makes sense to me.
>>64555848
HOLY FUCK!!! I DON"T GIVE A SHIT!!
Take care. Brush your hair.
>>64559017
I N S T I T U T I O N A L
H U M I L I A T I O N
Disney BTFO
Uh oh guess those other SW films in the works are going to get cancelled.
Jk, enjoy the next four years.
>>64567641
So they literally carry these honking things everywhere they go? Just in case? For 30 years? You realize that if they actually encountered him, those things would be entirely useless, right?
Christ, I liked the movie but these people are retards.
>>64567890
Can this be the new thing? "INSTITUTIONAL HUMILIATION"?
>>64555848
You sound like you have a lot riding on this tbqh pham. Maybe you're an opinionated idiot with no idea of what makes movies work. Just maybe.
>>64559017
>but only now, at the end, do they realize
wait a minute I recognize that line
>>64567908
>So they literally carry these honking things everywhere they go?
No, they figuratively carry them around.
>Just in case? For 30 years?
You know they aren't jedi only weapons, right? It's riot gear that's damn near indestructible and can even block plasma weapons. That's exactly what I'd take with me if I was raiding a weird smuggler bar.
>You realize that if they actually encountered him, those things would be entirely useless, right?
They'd block his lightsaber. You ever think maybe they made them when Luke still had a school of jedi? Blasters are useless against Luke too, better send a squad to kill him unarmed then.
>>64559017
>intitutional humiliation
Disney on suicide watch
>>64559017
BASED
A
S
E
D
>yfw the prequels had a million times more soul and originality
>>64568084
I caught that too. Read it in his voice
>>64568481
Which episode is that picture from again?
I've been meaning to rewatch Trailer Park Boys for a while now.
>>64568290
>You know they aren't jedi only weapons, right? It's riot gear that's damn near indestructible and can even block plasma weapons. That's exactly what I'd take with me if I was raiding a weird smuggler bar.
What the fuck are you talking about? It's a staff, not a shield. Why the fuck would it be made to withstand blaster shots? If I was in a bar, I'd want a fucking blaster! It's not like these guys are going to use non-lethal force anyway. They made it pretty clear that they just shoot anyone that mildly inconveniences them. I mean, they were SHOOTING the people on that planet, not trying to break up a fucking protest, you stupid fuck.
>You ever think maybe they made them when Luke still had a school of jedi?
Which was destroyed by Kylo Ren. Why do they still carry them?
>Blasters are useless against Luke too, better send a squad to kill him unarmed then.
No, better to either:
A: surround him with like a hundred guys. Blasters start becoming effective in those situations, as we have seen before.
or more likely:
B: realize that Stormtroopers would never be able to harm Luke in any way. You're only hope is with vehicles or with a dark jedi.
>>64568640
I can't even begin to remember.
>>64568707
>It's a staff, not a shield.
I mean there's a shield too but I wasn't talking about it. It's not a staff, it's a baton/tonfa. It's an electrified baton, it's riot gear. Are you saying it isn't riot gear?
>If I was in a bar, I'd want a fucking blaster!
And that guy had one, he was using it with the shield before he took out the baton. Seriously, did you not watch the movie?
>It's not like these guys are going to use non-lethal force anyway. They made it pretty clear that they just shoot anyone that mildly inconveniences them.
The took Han, Chewie, and Finn prisoner in that same sequence. Did you watch the movie? I'm really asking now because it seems like you're arguing about this having just scene a webm or trailer.
>Why do they still carry them?
Why get rid of your invincible riot gear just because there's only one jedi you know about? It's riot gear, not a weapon only for fighting jedi get that through your head.
>>64568976
Not him but you do know the baton itself (like Grievous' magnagards' staff) has to be made of a specific, rare and expensive lightsaber-resistant material, right? It's not just electrified metal that blocks lightsabers
>>64555918
#justice4armond
>literally caring about user scores
>>64555848
They used The Force on Metacriticby giving them a large amount of money.
>>64555848
Maybe they realized they were being overrun by 4chan neckbeard "reviews" bashing it.
>>64569517
hey Disney intern
>>64559017
ONLY NOW, AT THE END
>>64569517
Mix bleach and ammonia and make your family breathe it in Disney-shill
>>64568976
Fuck off
>user reviews
>on metacritic
>ever
no
>>64569294
What sources you got?
>>64569613
Goodnight anon
>>64557694
I saw it with my own eyes if you'll take my word for it.
Nothing but well-reasoned, reasonably-scored reviews explaining how TFA was a poorly-conceived, shallow cash grab.
>all negative reviews judge a huge array of qualities about the film
>positive reviews, "such action, such adventure"
>>64568976
FUCK OFF
>>64559017
Absolutely Fucking BASED
This should be Holy Text to bash JJ
>>64569613
>>64571829
sure is 9gag up in here
>>64555924
>Reboot getting more score than original
this is the world we live in
>>64559468
What about Rotten TOmatoes?
Im suprised is above 90%
Is Disney paying all the cirtics?
Are metacritic users "redpilled"? All other websites are praising this flick: IMDb, RYM, letterboxd, etc
>>64572261
You're gonna make anon think I replied to them, don't do that. When someone is that autistic you just ignore them and hope they wander off.
>>64572426
I'm sure most critics are stupid enough to take the low ball on the first offer.
>>64559468
It's almost like review bombing is a thing.
>>64572426
Paid critics is nothing new. I'm pretty sure they did in advance because a lot was on the line for Disney.
>>64572639
>Are metacritic users "redpilled"?
It's called a review bomb moron.
These companies buy moderator accounts from Metacritic. I have seen Sony Pictures do this consistently.
>>64555918
Must push down New Vegas more...must not pay bonus....
>>64572722
how can you say for sure it's a review bomb and not legitimate dissatisfaction with the movie?
>>64559017
This review gave me a boner of vindication
>>64565345
Star Wars fan here. VII isn't a star wars movie it's fanfiction with a Marvel coat of paint. The prequels were bad movies, but at least they were star wars movies.
Is this the site where almost all users just give movies either a 10 or 0?
![databank_electrostaff_01_169_16d9e207[1].jpeg_region=0%2C49%2C1560%2C780.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/y7QP2Hp.jpg "databank_electrostaff_01_169_16d9e207[1].jpeg_region=0%2C49%2C1560%2C780.jpg")
>>64567384
>make it up
>>64573739
>The prequels were bad movies, but at least they were star wars movies.
