So which would you rather have?
A deeply flawed film by George Lucas that feels like epic CINEMATIC Star Wars, or a Star Wars film with Marvel sensibilities that plays it safe and is a crowd pleaser?
This is the question you all should be asking yourselves.
>>64439169
I'd rather have a hamburger I like than deeply flawed steak.
>>64439169
The safe film. Sorry Lucas.
>>64439357
Your loss.
>>64439169
Anything but Marvel. Don't get cocky, Lucas
>epic CINEMATIC Star Wars
So this should exclude the prequel trilogy, which is directed like a daily tv soap opera would be, with regular intervals of convoluted battles done entirely on cgi on par with videogame cutscenes from five years ago.
>>64440530
>preferring something like an overcooked (ruined) steak to a 7/10 hamburger
You might be retarded, or just a hipster.
I'd rather have an epic CINEMATIC Star Wars written and directed by me.
I literally wouldn't be able to do worse than Attack of the Clones, so I can't lose.
I'd rather a good movie.
The PT is completely unwatchable.
TFA is something you can watch more than once just like 5 and 6.
4 is garbage because lucas is a shitty director but it has its moments.
I would like Star Wars movies to have stopped after the OT, and I would have liked Star Wars Games to be nothing but KotoR II.
