it's a very male movie

>ywn get to see broken arrow at the mall of america with david foster wallace

:(

>>64381226
great movie
makes me terrified of my own artistic endeavors

i like it even though it's a glib facsimile

I appreciate Segel's performance but Eisenberg is just there acting as himself and that's not even the first time, he's a genuine fraud as an actor.

>>64381226
Fantastic Wallace overview from that era, it gives you a great summary if you dont know anything about him. The film is complete shit though, Segel has a big nose; it looks even bigger with those glasses, I'm sorry but its too distracting. Eisenberg is so bad like so fucking bad '''''acting''''', count how many times he makes that little laugh in every scene is unbelievable

>>64381957
Segel's performance was good but I thought he didn't look like Wallace much.
I've been saying that about Eisenberg since fucking forever, he literally plays himself in every movie and in his case that's not a good thing.

>>64381226
What a spooky film

>>64381226
>wrote one good book
>great writer

st. dave post-death garbage