>>64376512
Probably not, but I'll still go see it.

>>64376512

This movie was decent but it really doesn't need a sequel

>>64376512
>You think it'll be as good as the first one?
No.

Seriously, name a movie with a sequal better than the original.

Bonus points for it being a blatant cash-grab sequal, like most of them.

>>64376558
>Aliens
>T2
>Star Wars Episode 5
Unless this is bait.

>>64376539
This. Still gonna see it because the first one was so good, but meh.

>>64376589
>buying into /tv/ memes this hard.
Not even once.

Not even going to start with the fact that none of those movies are even good.

>>64376589
I'll give you t2 because based cameron but you are unequivicolayy lmao wrong

about the other two

>>64376558
godfather
dollars trilogy
toy story
A New Hope's sequel Empire strike back
Star trek 2 to star trek the motion picture
James Bond...though thats cheating, i'll admit.

>>64377185
>godfather
meme scarface tier sequel
LOL MIAMI DRUGS N SHIT LOL
Only interesting part was the negotiation with the politician, rest was pure SCARFACE YO GANGSTERS LMAO
>dollars trilogy
Yes
>toy story
No
>A New Hope's sequel Empire strike back
Yes
>Star trek 2 to star trek the motion picture
Nfi
>James Bond...though thats cheating, i'll admit.
Nfi

>>64377245
>meme scarface tier sequel
Godfather part 2?

considered one of the best movies of all time and one of the best sequels ever made?

shit taste, anon.

>>64378282
>appeal to popularity

your opinions are based on consensus? kek. get a backbone kid.

>>64378391
no, ive seen the fucking movie.
its legit good.

>>64376512
I enjoyed the first, good luck to him on the second. This is good news to me.

>>64378455
>better than the first

which parts exactly made it better? the flashback with deniro? those scenes alone?

literally garbage opinion

>>64378552

this is the highlight of your day, isn't it?

>>64378581
Not him but, refute his points.

Or don't bother, what good does getting on your high horse in this shithole do?

All it did was prove him right, and you wrong.

Stand up for yourself and learn to articulate. Faggot.

>>64378631

What points? Basically comes down to personal preference and he (ie you) either have shit taste or a contrarian, or just fucking around. The points are out there, dissected and spoonfed by better critics than me. Go look it up if you're genuinely curious unless you're just starved for some human interaction

>>64378724
His point is your opinoin is shit, which it is, as you have admitted you don't even have one but just parroting the pop opinion of 'critics'.

>unless you're just starved for some human interaction
Why would you even reply to my obvious bait?

>>64378769
>>64378769
wrong guy, dumbass.

also, no he technically made no points defending Godfather prt 2 is worse than prt 1.

calling someone else's taste shit is not a point, its an opinion.

>>64379174
It is a point, and it needs to be refuted.

Good thing he is gone though, right?

:^)