>there are people who browse this board RIGHT NOW who actually prefer DC cinematic universe to Marvel
Explain yourselves.
>>64369578
I really hate manlets
WB is making a new brand called DC Films
When will Disney rename Marvel Studios to Meme Flicks?
>>64369578
I like Superman and Batman.
>>64369578
>I like to drink vomit rather than eat feces
cool thanks for letting us know
at least this isn't a Star Wars thread so you know whatI'm not even gonna sage
>hurr, this brand of dung is better than the other
mangia! MANGIA!
I can't remember the last time I halfway enjoyed a marvel film adaptation.
I wish they'd give Spiderman to DC so maybe we could finally get a decent film series for him.
>>64369775
Never fucking reply to me again unless you're contributing to the thread.
>>64369805
the only thing a film degree is good for is bitterly shitposting online about how you dont enjoy anything at all and projecting your frustration over the fact your life is a miserable existence doomed to retail work.
/tv/ will never be free of these jaded shitposters who studied something worthless. Best just to ignore them. As they say, dont feed the trolls.
I only watch DC movies for their memes. They're very meme-worthy.
DC power levels are tamer, and more consistent, and they tend to pander less to SJW fads du jour.
>there are people who browse this board RIGHT NOW who are 18+ and actually know the difference between cartoons made for children
Explain yourselves.
>>64369928
>DC power levels are tamer
The shit? This fucker here destroyed an entire city alone and killed billions.
>>64369944
>cartoons
lol what? they've been doing live action adaptations for decades.
go shitpost here
>>>/a/
>>64369987
HAIR
>>64369805
I am. Pic related is you after a healthy dose of metaphorical excrement.
DC films are pure cinema.
>>64369578
>marvel
bunch of whiny, teen-apealing faggots, with their faggy problems all dressed up like queers
>dc
Modern equivalent of greek/roman mythologies
Literally pantheon: revisited
>>64369987
Plus DC characters develop a new power every week, not just Superman
And I'm a DCfag
>>64370001
>not actually knowing the cartoon board
>>>/co/
This is MARVEL.
This is DC.
>>64370313
no, I intentionally meant to insult anime and its fans as manchildren watching cartoons for kids and living in denial about it.
It was a very deliberate thing.
>>64370185
Literally
>Superman - Zeus
>Batman - Hades
>Wonder Woman - Hera/Artemis/Athena (women are inconsistent)
>Flash - Hermes
>Green Lantern - Hephaestus
>Aquaman - Poseidon
>Green Arrow - Apollo
>>64370323
>>64370371
Dc defends conservative values.
>>64369578
I hate them both. But if I had to choose, it would be the Dark Knight Rises
<spoiler>for you</spoiler
>>64370323
>>64370371
yeah, they both suck. your point?
>>64370436
>Batman
For me he was like Ulysses.
One man thrown into the realm of gods.
>>64370568
Could be too
Superman also works as Herakles
>>64370603
Disney's Hercules was pretty much Superman.
>>64370603
It's open for interpretation, but the fact remain that DC is modernised mythology, while Marvel is teen-pulp
>>64370458
The main thing I don't like in the visuals of the MCU is that everything looks too smooth. No texture at all. Snyder is great at texture, check out that metal bat cowl, doesn't it look like a credible physical object? And Supes' suit with the filigree, so great.
>>64369804
well first off
fuck you for pretending a grimdark spiderman where he stands in the shadows and broods would be decent
secondly marvel havent even gotten their shot at a spiderman flick yet so chill
>>64370507
ZOD DINDU NUFFIN!!!
I pretty much agree with this film critic.
>>64370697
>blah blah blah
>i'm a spider-man fag
Even AMS is better than Raimi's run...
DC is not afraid of showing penises, for one. That's pretty bold.
Marvel showed sex scenes in Jessica Jones, BUT ONE EVEN ONE SINGLE SHOT OF A BLACK DICK. NOT ONE. They were fully clothed the entire time. Pure bullshits.
Where are the dicks, Marvel? Where are them?
I like it when films have consequences.
If you're going to have people fighting to the death, maybe you should actually show a little blood. I think it's pretty silly that in the alien invasion for The Avengers there isn't a single causality, even Harry Fucking Goddamn Potter had some collateral damage in it and those films are for babies. I also prefer films where villains have more motivation than "I'm evil."
Marvel films are just sterile and the very definition of "playing it safe." Not like DC films are high art or anything, but at least they're trying to be a little more than absolutely nothing.
>>64369578
I like DC characters more. I wasn't a big fan of Man of Steel but I have some hope for Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad.
I understand why people prefer marvel. I just have no attachment to marvel characters like I do with DC
>>64370765
Why are muslims so into DC for some odd reason?
>>64370770
? why would i disagree with that? i hate all the fox spiderman movies
not one of them does the character right, but give him to dc and he will get the same grimdark character wash.
>>64370828
Pretty much this.
>>64370794
all the dicks are busy in board meetings to try and decide the next 12 films
Marvel movies are all the same, DC's will probably be too, but at least it's a different kind of same.
>>64370830
They love gods of murder.
>>64370897
fair enough on this
at least with the dc cookie cutter grimdark we only have to see it one in a blue moon
marvel meanwhile are cranking out the same shit at a constant basis, their drying the well and are going to get a huge backlash someday
Does anyone remember that Blade is Marvel property and first Blade is fucking good?
DC at least based a character on m00t.
There are higher chances of there happening a mass shooting during DC movies screen, than Marvels. That's always neat.
Only two marvel movies are kinda enjoyable
>Winter Soldier
and
>Guardians of Reddit
That being said it's pretty weak for 12 movies..
>>64370817
This to be honest senpai desu
>>64371062
You liked Iron Man and Avengers when they came out originally. Don't lie just to be contrarian.
>>64370990
wasnt blade one of the properties they sold?
so marvel had nothing to do with that, just like swamp thing, xmen, or f4
>>64371062
DC doesn't have a good movie in their catalogue, thou
>>64370993
kek
If that Suicide Squad trailer description is real then it sounds like it'll be fucking amazing. Guess we'll find out on the 19th.
>>64371062
antman is pretty good though anon
>>64371177
What trailer? What description?
>>64371157
Man of Steel was ok, better than a lot of MCU film which are often borderline insufferable. But BvS looks like they've stopped aping Nolan and gone full high octane Snydervision. Which is awesome.
>>64371213
New trailer coming on the 19th, here's the supposed leaked description.
http://heroichollywood.com/home-1/2015/12/28/suicide-squad-2nd-trailer-shot-for-shot-breakdown
I know it's a rumour but Kevin Smith who's presenting said some things that make this sound legit.
>>64371235
i really hope im wrong, but it seems to me their trying to force to much plot and worldbuilding into one movie
really hope they actuall do the storyline justice and it doesnt devolve into
NOW INTRODUCING ALL THE WAY FROM THE PACIFIC OCEAN, THE ALL TIME HELL RAISING BALLTIGHTENING AWESOME KING OF THE SEA, AAAAQQQUUAAAAMANNNNNN
ETC
>>64371101
Nah.
Iron man was kinda meh. And when their shit all over hammer in second one i was dissapointed.
I never was into avengers
>>64371136
I want blade back
The good one... Like the first one
>>64371157
>Dark Knight Return animation
>Flashpoint Paradox animation
>Batman (Nolan's run)
>Batman (by Burton)
>Man of Steel (it was good; zod was fuckin' innocent)
Marvel is just mass produced, mass apealing crap
>>64369578
Batman is cool and Ironman is not.
>>64371369
>I want blade back
>The good one... Like the first one
me too anon..me too
>>64371399
i'm sad now
>>64371350
Yeah, maybe. I'm liking what I've seen so far though.
>>64369685
>When will Disney rename Marvel Studios to Meme Flicks?
As soon as they're done with scripting Guardians of Memelaxy/Star Memes crossover
>>64371494
haha more like Memers of the Shitlaxy amirite? :P
>>64371399
More i think of it the more occures to me that Blade was good because it wasn't treated as comic book movie.
>>64371532
Crossover will be named:
Meme Wars ep I The Force Avengers
The entire pretense of this thread is false. The "DC cinematic '''universe''''" includes all of ONE FREAKING MOVIE. Versus Marvel's 13, there is no comparison!
This just goes to show how insecure, scared and defensive Marvelfags. They got a dozen movie headstart, but thet see Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad coming so of course theyre gonna be super defensive and shitpost LIKE THIS VERY THREAD!!
DC COMING FOR YOU NIGGA
>>64369987
Doesnt Marvel has a guy that can destroy the entire universe with the snip of his magical glove fingers?
>>64369987
DCEU Superman would fucking destroy MCU Thor.
Prove me wrong.
>>64371639
The worst part of threads like these is when spergs try box office analysis and lecture people on dramatic structure. Sounds like football fans who always know what their team should do. "Oh they just need to shore up their defense, then they'll kick the crap out those other guys."
>>64371672
Superman still murdered trillions with his very own hands.
>>64371672
Marvel has a kid who's capable of creating entire universes...
Name one Marvel superhero who can take on Flash or Superman and win.You can't. Flash alone would destroy the entirety of marvel heroes.
>>64371761
All the criticisms of MoS apply to The Avengers as well.
>>64371721
If Thor's hammer magic then supes will probably die...
Bats on the other hand would rape them all marvelites out of existence
>>64371840
>Thor's Hammer beats Supes.
Kek, no.
>>64371761
With proper circumstances he would become the supreme ruler of the world
>>64370993
ANONS HMMM
TELEVISION & FILM MEETS COMICS & CARTOONS
I LOVE IT
I LOVE BRINGING BOARDS TOGETHER
>>64371917
That first panel there is mighty sugestive. Wonder Woman is being held from behind by a strong guy while a bunch of phallic little dudes zap her all over her body.
>>64371946
>With proper circumstances he would become the supreme ruler of the world
You said?
>>64372039
>the glimpses of Red Son
One can always dream
>>64372039
That's a dream sequence mate. Batman's that is.
>>64369578
>Marvel movies > DC movies
>DC animated movies > Marvel animated movies
DC has potential but as long as they keep wanting to go with the super serious shit for the movies they'll keep on failing.
ITS COMICS SHIT you're going to have green super intelligent assholes in MC Hammer pants, Batcows, and bounty hunters riding around on motorcycles in space blasting heavy metal
>>64372182
Watchmen (although it's worse than motion comics) shits and cumms over all marvel's attempts of making a movie
>>64372182
>DC has potential but as long as they keep wanting to go with the super serious shit for the movies they'll keep on failing.
There's a middle ground between dour and the self-conscious "aren't we wacky?!" style of the MCU. BvS and SS look like they might hit it, both are completely over the top looking but they play the ridiculousness with a straight face rather than nudging you in the ribs to let you know not to take it seriously.
>>64371779
Wow Marvel stuff sounds like bad fanfiction.
>>64372254
The strange thing is in Marvel comics theres just a lot of super serious shit but in the movies the marvel universe is just much more friendly.
Conversely in the DC comics the universe is much more warm and friendly while in the movies its all super serious.
DC needs to take more chances. They're too safe. You'd never see DC doing something like GotG or Antman. The most "daring" thing they've shown so far is Suicide Squad, and even that has the Joker and Batman to anchor the thing.
Marvel started out with B-tier comic heroes and turned it into a huge brand. Hulk was moderately popular, mostly due to Ang Lee's movie, and Iron Man was a second-rate character until Favreau's film made him a huge sensation. Thor was a dud, and Captain America was seen as how Superman still is: corny and outdated. Marvel established those characters and made them work, and now they're all huge.
I chalk this up to Marvel having the better stable of comic characters to mess with. DC, in the eyes of normiesand mehas two draws: Batman and Superman. And one of those is a bland Mary Sue. Nobody cares much about Superman, hence why Batman has to be brought in to get people interested.
I love Batman. He's probably my second favorite comic character (1st would be the eternal GOAT, Spidey), but even I can see DC relies on him far too much.
>>64372254
Watchmen felt like a low budget fan-made movie. It was basically a 1:1 adaptation of the graphic novel but with bad acting.
>>64372586
>DC
>Not daring
Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad are way more daring than anything the MCU has put out. The MCU is the fucking opposite of daring, they hit a good formula with Iron Man and have not deviated since.
>>64372639
>1:1 adaptation
People who say this know nothing about making shit cinematic.
http://www.rogerebert.com/scanners/nite-owl-versus-the-bat-man
>>64372676
>BvS
>daring
How? It's the two big draws that I mentioned...but fighting! Whoa! Oh, and Wonder Woman is here too! And Lex Luthor! And Doomsday! That's not daring, that's desperation.
>Antman isn't daring
Because you're biased doesn't mean everyone else is. There's literally no other capeshit like Antman.
>>64372770
It's like Sin City: every panel of the comic is adapted to the movie in the exact same way. That's what I mean by 1:1, autist.
>>64372676
I think the anon before was talking of daring as in presenting new characters. Marvel did introduce superheroes through the movies that weren't well know before they hit the big screen. DC on the other hand, has always had a big hero in their films that will guarantee that at least some people will see it.
Don't get me wrong, I'm a DCfag and I'm looking foward to Suicide Squad and BvS but DC really needs to get out and take more chances with their movies. Otherwise, it'll be harder to appeal more to the audience in general.
Suicide squad could have worked if tarintino had directed it
>>64370276
>countless billions
>countless
>numerical value
do they actually write him to be retarded or is this the standard level of comic book writing?
>>64372826
Which isn't true at all about Watchmen.
>>64372908
b8?
>>64372779
Ant-Man isn't daring, it's about a guy who gets a supersuit and has to fight an evil corporate xecutive while trying to do right by his daughter. They didn't even have the balls to make him a real crook, he's a heroic "whistleblower" Totally fucking lame.
>>64372834
Everyone in Suicide Squad except Joker and Harley aren't well known.
I see so many people in here talking about how they are waiting for Suicide Squad to come out and how they think it'll be.
Then, I make a SS thread and fucking 12 year old redditors can't stop shitposting and saying MOM'S GONNA FREAK.
>>64372926
Show me the bit in the comic where Archie sprays fire to symbolize an orgasm, or when the swinging bathroom door gives us glimpses of Rorschach about to murder a dwarf, Snyder brings his own visual sense of humour to bear on the material.
>>64373002
Yeah, but that's the thing. They have at least one huge character to use as bait and attract people to the movie. Besides, there's a possibility Batman will have a small cameo.
>>64373045
You read the leaked trailer description? Sounds awesome.>>64371290
>>64369578
>there are people on this board RIGHT NOW who actually enjoy capeshit
Explain yourselves.
>>64373131
So what? Marvel made a conventional movie about an unknown character, DC is trying to make an unconventional movie about a know one. The latter is daring as a film, the former only as marketing.
>>64373160
I did. Actually, I made a thread about the leaked description and the only thing in the thread were memes and people laughing at the memes
>>64373204
Antman is far more daring than SS, what are you on about?
>sinking 100 million into a heist movie about a LITERALLY WHO? superhero with a LITERALLY WHO? director
>>64373287
>"Kids, want to go see the new marvel movie?"
>"Sure do dad!"
Not daring at all, not weird, more of the fucking same.
>>64373373
>a movie about BATMAN villains in the BATMAN universe led by BATMAN's biggest, most well-known villain...with special guest BATMAN
Yeah, so daring and shocking.
>>64373204
Not really, Antman wasn't a great for marketing, specially with an unknown character. Yes, Suicide Squad is indeed daring because of the atmosphere and the story Ayer is trying to bring to light, but I was just trying to clarify what the anon was saying and it's true, one way orthe other. Marvel presents new character more often than DC. DC focuses mostly on Batman and Superman. Suicide Squad seems great, but they have a solid anchor to achive success and it's that they are using as bait one of the most recognized villians of all time.
>>64373432
You only think in terms of the ad campaign not the actual movie. Suicide Squad is a way riskier proposition than Ant-Man.
>>64373486
>DC focuses mostly on Batman and Superman.
Yeah, except for all the forthcoming movies without them.
>>64373505
True, while Antman is safe, family-friendly, Suicide Squad is darker and edgier.
>>64373161
>he doesn't know who Vril Dox II is
>>64369578
>there are people who browse this board RIGHT NOW who actually watch and care about capeshit
>>64373553
Main problem with Warner Bros is if anything spooks them about something when it revolves around DC they pretty much dictate that Batman and/or Joker is put into it as fast as possible
>>64369578
>Explain yourselves.
better cinematography, lighting, film craft in general really.
also they hire directors to be the directors fo their own movies as oppossed to making assembly line bullshit.
even for those who dont like MOS have to admit its filmed and structured better than any MCU film.
>>64373553
Well, it seems to me that they are most likely going to feature in almost everyone of them, just a cameo, but they'll be there.
>>64372586
Marvel isn't daring one bit. When its the same fucking formula for every movie, who cares if the main character is different? It's the same shit.
Man of Steel is already different than what people are used to, now you're bringing in Batman to fight him, and throwing Wonder Woman in there? They got a plan anon, and it ain't the shitty plan Marvel has.
>>64369987
he didnt do either but he CAN do both
>>64373715
How can you say that? No way of knowing, anyway marvel is going that route already, next two solo films are stealth team films.
>Civil War
Tony included
>Ragnarok
Hulk.
>There are people on /tv/ right now who are participating in a sisyfight about Marvel vs. DC
It feels good that i can enjoy both for what they are instead of crying about which one is better.
>>64372586
>You'd never see DC doing something like GotG or Antman
the two safest possible movies?
>>64372851
kill youself.
>>64374276
>>64373721
weak b8 m8s
>>64374344
Just cuz you're a Marvelfag doesn't mean everyone else has to like the same shitty movies
Marvel began doing movie about unknown heroes because those were the only thing left. FOX had X-Men, Sony had Spider-Man. They couldn't use them. They only had Hulk. so they had to work with their lesser known heroes.
>>64374657
good thing Fox got Deadpool. Marvel would either not make a movie or shit it up.
DC has all its characters and with their Green latern movie to test the waters, they found doing what the MCU does it not good in terms of reliable profit or long lasting staying power.
So they've taken the opposite route.
They hired directors who arent faggot yes men,, like disney does, and they got directors to run the series.
nolan, goyer, ect. These arent directors commanded by producers, these are producers friends of producers and in Snyders case, married to one.,
DC's directors have a shit ton of power in these, so much so the films are being made under their own supervision and production company with only the simplest of guidelines added.
Snyder's taking care of supes and BVS because his style compliments giant ass super heros and that kind fo hard hitting action.
And they got David Ayer, who does crime crimes to direct....welll suicide squad, a fucking crime film.
also DC isnt afraid to go gritty.
Gritty is great, not grimdark, gritty.
Gritty is what allow people in mascot costume to rob a bank and shoot places up while super villains shoot back and kill them.
Gritty is what allows superman and batman to beat the fuck out of villains and push the limits what what constitutes PG-13.
DC may have had a rocky start but they set themselves up to go as hard as possible and to places that the MCU can only go with the netflix daredevil and punisher series.
>>64375450
Do DC fanboys actually think like this? Trust me, as an outsider looking in, you are only getting Marvel's scraps. You're the Star Trek to Marvel's Star Wars.
>>64375498
He's not wrong about directors having power about the DC related movies.
I mean, if you look at Suicide Squad you'll see that the aesthetic is pure David Ayer. Take his Joker. This shit is something taken straight from Training Day of Street Kings. It's not your typical Joker.
Then there's James Wan, who'll direct Aquaman solo movie, and the guy is talking about the movie as a horror flick with gruesome body horror and dark creatures. When you think of Aquaman, do you picture in your head body horror? But Wan directed SAW and other movies like that, so whatever. the dude is clearly doing whatever the fuck he wants.
>>64375450
>marvel fucking up the master of quips
You're delusional.
>>64375680
I agree that DC gives more power to their directors, but I think that can be a problem as well. Not only does it (obviously) affect continuity and "feel", but if you get a mediocre director and let him do whatever, you get a mediocre film. Whereas if you have the "suits" essentially directing the movies, they'll feel samey, but be consistent in quality. I also think DC hitching their wagon to Snyder instead of, say, Nolan was a bad choice, but that's for another topic.
>>64369714
faggot
>>64375498
im actually not a DC fanboy, i read more Marvel than DC and think both are ass for 80% of all works.
but in terms of Film DC is taking it more seriously as films as oppossed to a money scheme.
>>64375763
they wont do Deadpooll R rated, they'd make him lame or starlord 2.0
best thing ever for Deadpool was Tim Miller and Ryan Rynold make it low budgeted and get Fox to only fund it while they have everything else under they're control.
Also deadpool isnt QUIPPY in the marvel sense. He's just a mouthy reference spewing sexual harasser psychopath. silly light quips are fucking TAME for deadpool.
he's closer to chev chelios from Crank.
>>64375680
>Then there's James Wan, who'll direct Aquaman solo movie, and the guy is talking about the movie as a horror flick with gruesome body horror and dark creatures. When you think of Aquaman, do you picture in your head body horror? But Wan directed SAW and other movies like that, so whatever. the dude is clearly doing whatever the fuck he wants.
that sound god damn awesome now that i think of it.
>>64375680
>I mean, if you look at Suicide Squad you'll see that the aesthetic is pure David Ayer. Take his Joker. This shit is something taken straight from Training Day of Street Kings. It's not your typical Joker.
It also looks like he played soem Gotham City Imposters inbetween as well.
>>64375998
>Not only does it (obviously) affect continuity and "feel", but if you get a mediocre director and let him do whatever, you get a mediocre film.
Well so far none of the directors are mediocre, but thats an advantage, a mediocre movie is just ONE mediocre movie and the director can be replaced and not drag the entire universe down.
And in terms of continuity....nah....they can keep their shit intact while adding their own flare.
