[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>tfw my cinephile friend gives me a list of movies I should
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 62
Thread images: 13
File: tumblr_0101039013991309m.gif (480 KB, 500x197) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_0101039013991309m.gif
480 KB, 500x197
>tfw my cinephile friend gives me a list of movies I should definitely see
>3000 movies
>>
>>64341559
Roughly 250 days
>>
>>64341559
If it contains anything from Nolan or Apatow you can throw the entire list into the garbage can
>>
>>64341559
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/39753

>So there's trying to get Angie to agree to get Ridley Scott to direct her stupid Cleopatra vanity project, and Angie says he makes movies in an assembly line manner. So Angie corresponds with Amy Pascal and Scott Rudin:

>On 6/4/14 5:04 PM, "Angelina Jolie" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Just want to be clear that I support your instincts to reach out but I don't think we feel the same way about him. I am not sure it's a safe bet. So far I would rather wait for Marty in 2016 or find a new and interesting artist.

>On Jun 4, 2014, at 2:09 PM, "Scott Rudin-Personal" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Re: <no subject>
>Who are your wild cards?

>On Jun 4, 2014, at 2:19 PM, "1365" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I'm studying a few more films to be sure. Let's talk next week. Xxx
>Sent from my iPhone

>Scott:
>Perfect

>Then Scott and Amy talk privately in another thread about her:

>On Jun 4, 2014, at 3:20 PM, "Scott Rudin-Personal" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Beyond belief. She's studying films. Kill me please. Immediately.

>On 6/4/14 6:42 PM, "Amy Pascal" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Ridleys
>Or every film ever made?

>Scott:
>The latter.
>>
>>64341632

The list should contain only the most pretentious flicks, with Boyhood to cap
>>
>>64341632
>greatest cosmos movie since Kubrick's 2001 is garbage, because I say so

ok anon happy new year to you too
>>
>>64341955

Back to imdb
>>
>>64341955
hello reddit
>>
>>64342707
>>64342824
hi samefag
>>
Jolie BTFO!
>>
>>64341955
>>greatest cosmos movie since Kubrick's 2001
>>
>>64343467
>overblown grand picture of life montage for a typical pleb 50s family experience
>cosmos movie

wow solid comparison there
>>
There is legitimately about 100 movies that are worth watching.
>>
>>64343500
is that what Empire magazine tells you?
>>
>>64343467
>mkv snap

You may have better expectations for 2016, but frankly you should just kill yourself, like right now.
>>
>>64343497
Are you saying the Book of Job is not a cosmic tale?
>>
>>64343566
I'm saying The Tree of Life is not a cosmos movie, birdbrain
>>
>>64343537
Name 20 movies worth watching.
>>
>>64343540
Never reply to me contributing etc.

>>64343591
>movie that depicts man's place in the Universe is not a cosmic movie
>>
>>64343616
as I said, hamfisted 2-minute metaphors for man's place anywhere does not make a cosmos movie

and you're use the fucking word COSMIC, which is not the same fucking thing

2001 was in space
Interstellar was in space

it's simple analogy, except if you suffer from Down, buddy
>>
is it as good as my list?

CINÉMA:
1: ? (1990, Kurosawa)
2: This Night (1965, Fassbinder)
3: La morte d'Isotta (1968, Schröter)
4: Reassemblage (1982, Minh Hà)
5: ?pa?e??? ?a ?pac?o?? (1964, Radev)
6: ????????? (1957, Pestonji)
7: ????? ??????? (2001, Abdelhamid)
8: ¾??? (1984, Zhuangzhuang)
9: Oc??e?è ?y?è (1975, Radev)
10: Three Kings (1999, Russell)

FILMS:
1. ?ècü?a ?¸p?âo?o ÷eëoâeêa (1986, Lopushansky)
2. Un condamné à mort s'est échappé (1956, Bresson)
3. Guns of The Trees (1961, Mekas)
4. Love Streams (1984, Cassavetes)
5. êô?X½????ê?¢????¼ (1991, Yang)
6. Duelle (1976, Rivette)
7. Alice in den St?dten (1974, Wenders)
8. Le Rayon Vert (1986, Rohmer)
9. ?????-???? (1968, Parajanov)
10. Mauvais Sang (1986, Carax)

MOVIES:
1. Barry Lyndon(1975, Kubrick)
2. “V?‘‚?’n?– (1963, Kurosawa)
3. Blue (1993, Jarman)
4. Fanny och Alexander (1982, Bergman)
5. The Long Day Closes (1992, Davies)
6. “V?‘‚?’n?– (1963, Kurosawa)
7. Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
8. Providence (1977, Resnais)
9. ??§?µ???? (2006, Weerasethakul)
10. Punishment Park (1971, Watkins)

OVERALL:
Sommaren med Monika (1953, Bergman)
êô?X½????ê?¢????¼ (1991, —î)
??????? (1964, ????)
Ordet (1955, Dreyer)
Les Moissons du Ciell (1978, Malick)
Oê???pü «?ec??ü ??eé, êo?opûe ïo?p?cëè ?èp (1927, ?éçe???eé?)
??¸??» (1987, ?????±)
Fear and Desire (1953, Kubrick)
?epêaëo (1975, Tapê?âcêèé)
01010101 01101110 00100000 0100001101101000 01101001 01100101 0110111000100000 01000001 01101110 0110010001100001 01101100 01101111 01110101(1928, Luis Bu?uel)
???A±¯¸è (1936, œ???)
Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
>>
>>64343607
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls074845163/
>>
>>64343679
you should learn unicode or switch from Win95 man

also

>three kings

yeah, you fucked up already
>>
>>64343679
Kill yourself.
>>
>>64343607
Name 5 movies worth watching which won best film at Cannes?
>>
>>64341559
3000 is a little autistic, especailly if you're pleb in the art of cinema. Something like an essential 100-200 should be enough for a start and it shouldn't include Tarr or Tarkovsky shit that you'll fall asleep to.
>>
>>64343665
>as I said, hamfisted 2-minute metaphors for man's place anywhere does not make a cosmos movie
Do you know what the word cosmos means?
>the universe seen as a well-ordered whole.
The Tree of Life is about finding that cosmic order as viewed through the insignificant eyes of a human.

>and you're use the fucking word COSMIC, which is not the same fucking thing
Are you new to the concept of declension?

>2001 was in space
>Interstellar was in space
We're all in space, chump.
>>
>>64343728
>Palme d'Or
>measure of any greatness
>ever
>>
>>64343679
You went overboard, mate.
>>
>>64343679
>???????

ah, one of my favorites.

???? is also good
>>
>>64341559
Someone who gives you a list but not a watching order is not a true cinephile. If you dive headfirst into the deepest shit you'll be really lost and just do damage to your mind. It would be like serving dessert first.
>>
>>64343744
your head's in space m8 stop smoking shit. there is nothing cosmic about Tree of Life except the fucking hamfisted idea itself.

if I'd film a hamster dreaming of touching the stars, it wouldn't be a cosmos movie just because of the far-fetched idea

seriously just eat a dick
>>
>>64343744
dubs of truth
>>
>>64343713
top pleb
>>
>>64343744
YOU'RE A FUCKING CRETIN
>>
>>64343749
Name 2 movies worth watching which won the Silver Bear?
>>
>>64343728
>Name 5 movies worth watching which won best film at Cannes?
4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
Rosetta
Secrets & Lies
Underground
The Piano
Barton Fink
The Mission
Paris, Texas
Kagemusha
All That Jazz
The Tin Drum
Apocalypse Now
Taxi Driver
The Conversation
MASH
The Wages of Fear

pleb
>>
>>64343814
>implying I said the Bear is fucking better

also

>Silver

wow somebody doesn't know how medals rank
>>
>>64343778
This is correct.
>>
>>64343788
>there is nothing cosmic about Tree of Life except the fucking hamfisted idea itself.
Says the person who thinks Interstellar is anything more than an embarrassing high school project. Go spy on little girls in their bedrooms with some self-love, that's the only transcendence you can achieve.
>>
>>64343679
>posts one of the most spectacular failures imaginable

im almost impressed
>>
>>64343824
>4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
minimalist communist shit

>Rosetta
nobody cares

>Secrets & Lies
nobody cares

>Underground
gypsy communist shit

>The Piano
nobody cares

>Barton Fink
ok

>The Mission
even Woody Allen movies are less cheesy than this

>Paris, Texas
ok

>Kagemusha
chink cinuma

>All That Jazz
>singing

>The Tin Drum
nazi shit

>Apocalypse Now
cong shit

>Taxi Driver
autist shit

>The Conversation
ok

>MASH
>sitcoms are now movies

>The Wages of Fear
nobody cares
>>
>>64343872
hurr durr strong words there no way you projected how old you actually are and what you actually like to do, no sir
>>
>>64343943
Learn basic punctuation and how to argue.
>>
>>64344000
>learn how to argue preach after using troll safewords

mkvsnapfag just stop and go fap at your "cosmic" movie that's supposed to raise a bland disfunctional movie above its nature
>>
>>64344045
Nolanfag, go fap at your "cosmic" movie that's supposed to raise a bland cunny above its nature
>>
>>64344081
>troll argument used as comeback against actual movie-assessing argument

you're flooding the keyboard with your fagtears already m8
>>
>>64343872
>>64344000
>>64344081
You're the biggest fucking faggot on here. Reach for the rope.
>>
>>64344121
So you were using a troll argument all along? Why do you delude yourself?

>>64344151
First day on /tv/?
>>
>>64344166
>le classic "so you're the troll" switcheroo

oh what a tactic, keep grasping
>>
>>64344198
I used your own argument here >>64344081
The "switcheroo" happened two posts ago. I know it's hard for you, what with you blinded by Nolan memes, but try to keep up. You want to set an example for the rest of the year, or at least pretend to.
>>
I'm going to go watch Deep Impact, it features a comet, so it must be a cosmos movie of Kubrickian size
>>
>>64344246
>"I used your own argument"
>quotes his own post

you're embarassing yourself too much

even so

"cunny" is not an argument
"bland disfunctional family movie" is

you seriously don't need such explanation, except if you're an idiot troll, which you obviously are
>>
>>64344302
What a bland, dysfunctional post.
>>
>>64344334
What a cunny post.

Oh hey "I used your argument"

hahaha
>>
File: The Tree of Life.jpg (63 KB, 1920x1040) Image search: [Google]
The Tree of Life.jpg
63 KB, 1920x1040
>>64344370
Typical response from a Nolan fan, can only ape but not come up with anything of substance just like their auteur idol.
>>
>>64344406
>can not come up with anything of substance

says the guy who abandoned arguments of substance first, however shitty, twenty minutes ago in favor of "go fap to girls panties" and "cunny" comebacks
>>
>>64344406
also

>m-m-my auteur idol is better than yours, because two-minute montages, it makes it cosmic and kubrick-like
>>
>Nolan- and Malickfags at each others


ok
uhm so about this list of movies...
>>
File: Saturn and Jupiter.webm (3 MB, 1920x1040) Image search: [Google]
Saturn and Jupiter.webm
3 MB, 1920x1040
>>64344441
Only because those are the only substantive elements in your beloved's film.

>>64344464
>shaking so hard and itching for the submit button that you can't limit your tantrum bursts to a single post
Average Kubrick/Nolan baby, everyone.
>>
>>64344527
>keeps replying with worse and worse comebacks at everything

superior proof there

oh wait so you hate Kubrick as well, that's why you've been trying for the past hour to impose the idea that Tree of Life is the best since 2001. meaning by your own assessment, it's the shittiest since 2001. ok, wow, look at all your derp there. put a frame on it
>>
>>64344597
>, that's why you've been trying for the past hour to impose the idea that Tree of Life is the best since 2001. meaning by your own assessment, it's the shittiest since 2001.
Do you know how logic works or do you just type out any random argument your brainstem formulates?

>look at all your derp there
Why did you think it was good to graduate from /b/ to /tv/ for the new year?
Thread replies: 62
Thread images: 13

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.