>4th nomination in a row incoming
>only missed 2010 and 12 since 2008
>12 noms for cinematography and no oscars
why/how
Definition of a "meme cinematographer".
>>64319322
>why/how
Because he's good enough to be notable from the rest of the pack, but not really that good otherwise.
Based Lubezki is getting that 3peat win this year.
give me his tools and I'll set a shot up just as nice as him. cinematography in 2016 is all about how much money you have to splash around.
More like memekins
>>64319887
Deakins is the most based lens man ever hes never done any memetastic blockbusters in his entire career
>>64320510
Based on what?
What the hell is so good about Lubezki. Deakins' shots always look slick as hell, while the other guy is just a spic.
He probably won't win this year, but he's working with Villeneuve again on the Blade Runner sequel. Don't lose hope yet.
>>64319322
He directs movies. Just look at Prisoners and Sicario, all Deakins - Skyfall again covering up for trash director.
And his regular output is pretty boring at this point.
>>64320424
desu he has something going on with his lightning but everything else could be done by a non-retard with gear
