What does /tv/ think of Stars Wars reviewer revisionist history?
1. What does that even mean? How is he qualifying that?
2. Who cares? Critics aren't the end-all be-all.
>>64180226
How is he qualifying what? All the reviews took were before rereleases.
>>64180521
Which reviews?
>>64179440
those scores are 100% accurate though
>>64179440
>The Empire Strikes Back
>63%
Top kek
>>64179440
>Attack of the Clones
>Better than Empire Strikes Back
The guy is clearly retarded.
>>64179440
Rotten tomatoes must have taken awhile to load using the internet in 1977
>>64179440
He must really like TFA.
He is also a retard.
Reviewers used to be much, much harsher than they are now
>>64180677
Lots of people considered empire shit and a step down from 4 when it released
>>64181335
>Really? That Darth guy is suddenly Luke's father? What kind of contrived, asspull bullshit is that?
>>64179440
Fight Club was panned when it first came out and now its one of the most iconic films of the 90s, same with Thin Red Line
