![harry-potter-hermione-granger-hp7-snow-walk-6x4[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/7wWy4NU.jpg "harry-potter-hermione-granger-hp7-snow-walk-6x4[1].jpg")
considering the state /tv/ is in, i think it's safe to say we cant go much lower
so lets have a harry potter movie thread
3 > 8 > 4 > 2 > 5 > 7 > 1 > 6
Why is Sorcerer's Stone so comfy, bros?
>>64155582
because you're a fucking manchild without a sense of measured judgement and critique so you come up with an arbitrary meme to cover up for your plebness
Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>>64155756
Stephen king has some good books anon
Even /lit/ agrees
Harry, did I ever tsll you abouf Decree No. 3473-1882 of 1947? It was passed to validate Decree No. 1567klio-000094 9833-ipG.
It was a good law.
http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Decree_3473-1882_of_1947
I had the Sorcerer's Stone game on GBA. That was well fun.
>>64155756
Spamming is against the rules
>>64157327
>Even /lit/ agrees
Haha. No.
>>64157327
>Stephen king has some good books anon
>>>Even /lit/ agrees
>>64157768
what. the. fuck.
