So what you're saying is instead of accurate depictions of reality, all dramatised fiction should substitute real emotion and character depth for shallow polarised notions of good and evil?

Sounds pretty childish desu senpai

>>64150971
movies should teach, not depict reality (that is pure shit)

Unrelatable evil is weak evil.

>either the guy is just mentally unstable, and perceived as weak
>or he's a fucking idiot, which is also perceived as weak

A villain is best, to me, when I can understand what he wants while disagreeing with his methods. All else is childish bullshit that belongs in a fairy tale.

I can relate to Hitler because I know his reasons. It doesn't make him less interesting, it makes him more interesting.

I want badass villains who simply aren't pussies. I don't know of any qualifying villain so far, it's like Hollywood doesn't know how to write them.

>>64151008
>movies should teach
no

>>64150971
>>64151025

>childish

is this the new /pol/ meme word?

>>64151008
So it's better for a movie to teach fictionalised notions of good and evil, instead of portraying actual discussions of morality that will be more useful and relatable to people throughout their life? Surely you get a better life lesson out of something with depth and intrigue, than some fairy-tale bullshit.

>>64150910
r u 12?

>>64151078
why not? afraid of something? are you one of those who defend hateful defunct ideologies?

>>64151082
lmao and then people is surprised when psychos shoot up theatres

fuck off dude

>>64151147
No, I disagree that film is a medium to teach over.

File: 5159tELPeUL._SX326_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (127 KB, 328x499) Image search: [Google]

127 KB, 328x499

>>64151446

This.

>>64151446
dunno, usually are tinfoiled fascists do to this kind of reasonings

>>64150910
Watch Black Mass. It's one of the only movies where i felt that the bad guy was actually bad.