anyone else think these are cozy?
i don't watch any others, just these two one a year or so
I liked when they were in school and had a few fun adventures.
Then it became all about Voldemort and saving the world and i never even bothered finishing the series off.
>>64136075
post more of cutie
hell no. Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>Harry Potter
>anything but shit
Harry Potter is the definition of plebshit manufactured for uneducated morons. Get some decent taste, plebeian.
CINÉMA:
1: 夢 (1990, Kurosawa)
2: This Night (1965, Fassbinder)
3: La morte d'Isotta (1968, Schröter)
4: Reassemblage (1982, Minh Hà)
5: Кpaдeцът нa пpacкoви (1964, Radev)
6: โรงแรมนรก (1957, Pestonji)
7: قمران وزيتونة (2001, Abdelhamid)
8: ¾إشآ (1984, Zhuangzhuang)
9: Ocْنeيè ؤyّè (1975, Radev)
10: Three Kings (1999, Russell)
FILMS:
1. دècüىa ى¸pٍâoمo ÷eëoâeêa (1986, Lopushansky)
2. Un condamné à mort s'est échappé (1956, Bresson)
3. Guns of The Trees (1961, Mekas)
4. Love Streams (1984, Cassavetes)
5. êôژX½ضةظؤêڑ¢بثتآ¼ (1991, Yang)
6. Duelle (1976, Rivette)
7. Alice in den Stنdten (1974, Wenders)
8. Le Rayon Vert (1986, Rohmer)
9. Սայաթ-Նովա (1968, Parajanov)
10. Mauvais Sang (1986, Carax)
MOVIES:
1. Barry Lyndon(1975, Kubrick)
2. “Vچ‘‚ئ’nچ– (1963, Kurosawa)
3. Blue (1993, Jarman)
4. Fanny och Alexander (1982, Bergman)
5. The Long Day Closes (1992, Davies)
6. “Vچ‘‚ئ’nچ– (1963, Kurosawa)
7. Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
8. Providence (1977, Resnais)
9. لت§بµاأأة (2006, Weerasethakul)
10. Punishment Park (1971, Watkins)
OVERALL:
Sommaren med Monika (1953, Bergman)
êôژX½ضةظؤêڑ¢بثتآ¼ (1991, —î)
চারুলতা (1964, রায়)
Ordet (1955, Dreyer)
Les Moissons du Ciell (1978, Malick)
Oêٍےلpü «ؤecےٍü نيeé, êoٍopûe ïoٍpےcëè ىèp (1927, فéçeيٍّeéي)
؛ى¸كء» (1987, صإزصؤ±)
Fear and Desire (1953, Kubrick)
اepêaëo (1975, Tapêَâcêèé)
01010101 01101110 00100000 0100001101101000 01101001 01100101 0110111000100000 01000001 01101110 0110010001100001 01101100 01101111 01110101(1928, Luis Buٌuel)
ہثبA±¯¸è (1936, œد؟ع)
Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
>>64136208
>FILMS:
>MOVIES:
haha this was my top 20 and the titles were like that to counter that retard healeys shit posting in those old top 10 threads
where did everything go so wrong
>>64136409
wish girls dressed cutely god she looks like a bathroom slut
>>64135973
>>64136075
You're 100% correct.
/tv/ likes the edgy dark shit of HP3 and later, but fuck them.
based OP
HP3 is the right balance of dark and fun. 1 and 2 are kid's movies and 4 and after are edgy dark lord shit.
>>64136855
Gambon was way closer to the Dumbledore of the books, with the exception of that one unfortunate scene in Goblet of Fire and that movie was shit anyway.
>>64136200
>Harry Potter was was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects?all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
Agreed with this. They're dogshit and the third one is the only one that tried to be something more. Drones will tell you the first two are good, but its a tumblr meme by mongs trying to impress people on facebook.
>1
Despite clocking in at over two solid hours, the movie fails to properly set up and develop its characters and their back-stories, there is almost no build up and, even worse still, chemistry between the actors here. - 0/5
>2
Cramming in every "plot point" you can find in the book does not engaging storytelling make, and it's a wonder there ever was a third movie. - 0/5
>3
Splendid. An entirely enjoyable pop fantasy adventure that never for a moment insults the intelligence. By very very very very far the best of the Potter movies, the only one that manages to capture the funky mad energy of J.K. Rowling's hogwash. - 2/5
>4
Easy come, easy go. - 0/5
>5,6,7,8
Didn't see them
>>64135973
i stopped liking it when it stopped being about magic. my favorite is either the original or order of the pheonix. deathly hallows is pure shit.
>>64137080
>>64136208
You forgot "L'ascension du chevalier noir"
>>64136200
>>64137027
>shit opinions
lol I love seeing loosers on here not enjoy anything.
