[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
How butthurt are the Star Trek fags about this new trailer?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 61
Thread images: 12
File: st13_1200_650_81_s.jpg (86 KB, 1200x650) Image search: [Google]
st13_1200_650_81_s.jpg
86 KB, 1200x650
How butthurt are the Star Trek fags about this new trailer?
>>
>>64028691
Forgot
https://youtu.be/zdCP9glznEA
>>
>>64028691
I liked the new trailer. Looks better than Bat Man vs Super Man and Captain American vs Ironman
>>
>expect sci-fi
>get hiphop soundtrack and twitter generation one-liners
>>
It genuinely looks terrible.

Spoiled that the Enterprise gets destroyed and the whole movie is a fucking action set piece away mission?

JJ wasn't great but Justin Lin is cancer. Keep that chink on useless garbage like the Fast & Furious movies.
>>
I think it looks pretty good. Everyone else seems to hate it though.

I will never understand the standard people are holding these to. If you want to be critical, every star wars movie is a tire fire on some level
>>
>>64028847
trek***
>>
>>64028813
Star Trek is nerd shit homie I've moved onto Star Wars broski the dudebro sci fi series enjoy your dead franchise
>>
I'm hoping Lin goes fucking overboard and turns this movie into a fucking action filled shit fest.

I want Spock dual wielding phasers larger than himself blasting away armies of Klingons while Kirk uses a motorcycle to jump over a warbird and throw a smoke bomb into its chimney and blow it up and maybe Scotty steals some enterprise ships and races them so they can win an illegal tournament and receive a macguffin from some bad guy.

I mean,if you're gonna fuck it up, might as well go all the way.
>>
File: reddit.png (103 KB, 910x516) Image search: [Google]
reddit.png
103 KB, 910x516
>>
These movies seem so well cast yet none of the characters are actually characters. They're just old Star Trek copies turned up to ten.
>>
>>64029030
hello reddit
>>
File: 1434235533860.jpg (437 KB, 1508x1493) Image search: [Google]
1434235533860.jpg
437 KB, 1508x1493
>>64029030
>>
>>64029030
hello reddit
>>
File: 1403735911338.png (117 KB, 320x263) Image search: [Google]
1403735911338.png
117 KB, 320x263
>>64029030
Hello Reddit
>>
>>64029021
REEEEDDDDIIIIIITTTTTTT!!!!
*stands in elvis pose for 5 - 7 seconds*
*dabs*
HEEEELLLLLLOOOOO
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (42 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
42 KB, 1280x720
>>64029030
Hello Reddit
>>
>>64029063
>>64029067
>>64029079
>>64029103
Thank you fellow Redditors. Please upvote my last post so we can make it to the front page of 4chan. It will be epic.

And remember to vote for Bernie! Feel the Bern!
>>
>>64029030
That's right Mike
>>
>>64028983

But this is pretty much how the original series went lmoa
>>
Post more Alice Eve
>>
>>64028691
It's kind of hard to say I'm disappointed because each one was slightly worse than the last. If anything I just hope it does bad enough that the new series doesn't try to imitate that style.
>>
>>64029030
>turned up to ten
The quote is "turned up to eleven" anon
>>
>>64029286
That doesn't make sense, as most things work on a 1-10 scale with 10 being the maximum
>>
>>64029336
Wasssup Reddit?
>>
>>64028691
>That music
>Justin Lin
Good lord what a catastrophe
>>
>>64028691

>1970s
>A New Hope revitalizes interest in science fiction and paves the way for Star Trek films based on the original series
>21st century
>director of the new Star Trek films ends up later directing the new Star Wars film

it's like poetry
>>
>>64029336
Do you have autism?
I don't ask in an attempt to degrade you, I am genuinely curious.
>>
Star trek died a long time ago, Justin Lin is just making it a spicy meatball for mainstream viewers now.
http://www.claremont.org/crb/article/the-politics-of-star-trek/
>>
>>64029380
How is that like poetry at all?
Poetry is a form of literature that uses aesthetic and rhythmic qualities of language—such as phonaesthetics, sound symbolism, and metre—to evoke meanings in addition to, or in place of, the prosaïc ostensible meaning.

This is just a somewhat ironic situation.
>>
>>64028691
>How butthurt are the Star Trek fags about this new trailer?

Not butthurt in the slightest. Even Simon Pegg admits that the trailer is shite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f4aAwa5wdg
>>
>>64030952
>implying that the actual film will be better than the trailer
Don't forget that Simon "It's not Khan" Pegg has a history of lying to the fans.
>>
>>64028700
This seriously looks like the movie I wanted star wars to be.
>>
>>64031014
>>implying that the actual film will be better than the trailer

Are you fucking stupid? Of course the film is going to better than a 2 minute trailer.
>>
>>64028847
for me, the issue is that a Star Trek movie should capture the tone and style of Star Trek rather than making into action romance movie #1542. It's very hard for a franchise to obtain it's own unique voice in an over saturated environment, Star Trek has that but it's not being used.
>>
>>64031122
The trailer isn't 2 minutes long, you dummy. You should go back to school and learn to count because right now it's clear that you can't count. They probably kicked your stupid butt out of school the first time because class started at 8 and you kept showing up at 9. And you kept skipping weekdays and coming in on weekends because your dumb brain can't handle a 7-day week. Your parents wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars on your failed education, and you can't comprehend why they cry themselves to sleep every night, because you can't understand whether or not a "hundred" and a "thousand" are big numbers. Your posts are so stupid, I bet you can't even tell the difference between 4chan and 420chan. I know you can't count, but at least we can all count on you to make us feel better about our own lives in comparison to yours.
>>
>>64031230
Right but you've seen TOS, what part of punching aliens and making it with hot alien broads is not capturing the tone and style of it?

I mean yea the stuff with Spock having a love interest is dumb but you cant carbon copy it, and even the Vulcans marry and fuck so why not?

I mean watch The Motion Picture and tell me why these movies are so off point.
>>
>>64029286
But they didn't go the extra mile.
>>
>>64031513
>Right but you've seen TOS, what part of punching aliens and making it with hot alien broads is not capturing the tone and style of it?
I know that YOU haven't seen TOS.

When Kirk punches ayylmaos like the Gorn, he is filled with regret, and he bemoans the sad circumstances that led them to such a sad fate.

When grills fall madly in love with Kirk, he doesn't go about "making it" with them, because His Ship is the only True Love for him.

New Trek isn't based on Old Trek, it's based on memes about Old Trek.
>>
>>64028691
people actually still care about star trek?
>>64028700
kek
that's fucking horrible looking. wouldn't even torrent it.
>>
>>64031655
>this is what TOS fanbois actually believe

Ive watched TOS mate. There's a very good reason the memes exist.

Also I dare you to tell me Voyage Home has profound deep meaning. Because that shit is retarded but clearly the best of the TOS movies.
>>
Do they have realistic fake tits in the Star Trek universe?
>>
>>64029336
have you ever seen an amp
>>
>>64031513
Referencing isn't quite the same. It's more of a combination of the many little things, from pacing and build-up, to characterisation and tone.

I'm not asking for more nods to the original franchise, (that's what ruined the Peanuts and Star Wars for me), I'm asking for new unexplored situations and tales using the same personality the franchise is known to bring, (think Mad Max: Fury Road).
>>
File: 1301862044310.png (86 KB, 235x215) Image search: [Google]
1301862044310.png
86 KB, 235x215
>>64031820
>>
File: Quark_as_Lumba.jpg (43 KB, 500x383) Image search: [Google]
Quark_as_Lumba.jpg
43 KB, 500x383
>>64031784
In Star Trek, full-body plastic surgery takes five minutes, regardless of whether you're switching from man-to-woman or human-to-klingon. And it's so realistic that everyone-- EVERYONE-- is fooled by it.
>>
>>64031854
So what was wrong with JJ Trek #1?
>>
>>64031759
Wait, so... you're not a TOS fanboy?

Shame.
>>
>>64031919
The Beastie Boys.
>>
so they're only going to be on one planet the entire movie? sounds boring
>>
>>64031959
Thats not even a legitimate excuse. Youve got Picard listening to classical music all throughout TNG.

>>64031935
Im a TNG fanboy. TOS holds the #2 spot.
>>
>>64029617
First day?
>>
File: Reddit loves TNG.jpg (97 KB, 1033x616) Image search: [Google]
Reddit loves TNG.jpg
97 KB, 1033x616
>>64032029
>Im a TNG fanboy.
Hello, [website].
>>
>>64031919
To me, it was an action move. And it's not like Trek never did action before, but there was very little logic to it and most, (if not all), of the sex appeal wasn't really meaningful or subtle. I enjoyed the first one only as an action movie, believing the next one will be better.
>>
>>64029617
It's a reference to ecelebs.
>>
>>64031919
I've watched JJ #1 several times. Crucify me, but I still think it's fucking great.
>>
>>64032129
Ill grant you that it was much more actiony, but every version of Star Trek goes a different direction. Whats so wrong with trying action out for a change?

And what happens if they do the JJ movies the same as the TOS movies? I wager you would complain about how it was a shameless rip off.
>>
File: Wayne.jpg (27 KB, 300x400) Image search: [Google]
Wayne.jpg
27 KB, 300x400
>>64032206
I agree.
>>
>>64032256
I think maybe the reason why I'm so sour with Darkness was because it more even More actiony, more nonsensical and even more obvious with it's references and fan service.

If every version Star Trek goes a different direction then it should have happened by now cause it's wearing thin fast... at least for me.
>>
File: latest-2.png (369 KB, 694x530) Image search: [Google]
latest-2.png
369 KB, 694x530
>>64028691
Because it's not Star Trek you fucking mong.
>>
>>64028700
I'm not as cynical as most people here but holy shit that DID look bad
Thread replies: 61
Thread images: 12

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.