How would you rate the revenant?
10/10
>>63874783
irrevenant
It was great until Kylo Ren killed the bear.
>>63874783
If you watch the screener you literally ruined the movie for yourself.
Pic related.
9/10 but Leo is gonna get kek'd out of the oscar again despite his great performance
5/7
>>63874905
Tom Hardy was based, though. He might get a supporting nomination instead.
11/13
>>63874905
>crawl around and grunt for two hours
>great performance
Go back to reddit cuck
>>63874855
I was 90% done downloading
Thanks to you I didn't waste anymore of my time
>muh noble savage
hugh glass was murdered by the same indians a few years later
>>63874855
What's wrong?
>>63875065
Nothing. The quality is fine.
>>63875110
It's a DVD screener, you know. What were you expecting?
>>63875065
He's talking about the quality. The movie is a visual spectacle and by watching a grainy low res you're ruining the experience.
Anyone got english subtitles for this?
>>63875151
You sound like a shill. We aren't paying so fuck off. If you want people to give you Oscars for a "visual spectacle" send out Bluray screeners.
>>63875415
I was only saying what that other anon was implying. I saw the screener and I don't give a shit if you pay for it or not. But keep memeing like a faggot and claim everyone is a shill.
Isnt this movie coming out next week? How have you seen it already
>>63875567
The Revenant (2015) DVDSCR x264 DD5.1-NoGrp
>>63875617
Nice, thanks
>>63874920
>>/9gag/
Is the bear rape scene legit?
>>63875999
It's been discussed a million times. Yes. And it's not just one, there's two.
You don't need full res to see this movie was shot by a camera god
Definitely the best screener so far
Until space chip leaks
>>63874783
Le trees Photoshopped in the hair. Christ, I thought hipsters were obsessed with avoiding being played out clichés.
>>63874783
8/10, the pacing was a bit off, and I didn't care about Leo's son so that part of the revenge plot felt weak.
Both Leo and Tom Hardy did excellent.
>>63875999
the bear was a female protecting its cub
>bear rape
GTFO
>bear scene
Fuck me that was brutal. Like one of the few scenes that have truly left me with a feeling of horror.
>>63874783
5/10
I was hoping for a well written, well acted action/drama about overcoming, survival and revenge, but got a boring, pretentious personal art project of the director.
it's a mediocre movie with amazing cinematography.
>>63874986
don't forget eating dirt and cutting carcasses.
leo's worst job in the last 15 years.
>>63875155
No but it would be good since I can't understand most of what Tom Hardy is saying
>it's a long shot
>camera rotates around a thing
>someone (mostly Leo) suffers terribly on screen
>Tom Hardy says something you can't understand
every scene
Tom Hardy killed it here, leagues ahead of Dicaprio
kek
>good things
Tom Hardy
the bear fight
it's pretty
>bad things
everything else
solid 4/10
I swear to god Domhnall Gleeson is in everything nowadays
>>63875145
thats the point idiot
>>63874783
So the natives searching for the missing daughter, was Hardy responsible for that? Did it serve a purpose? Or am I just retarded?
>>63877833
>I wanted entertainment but I got art
>>63874783
How in the fuck are we supposed to rate a film that isn't out yet?
>>63881093
>the french took her
the ree scalped fitz to pay back glass for rescuing her
>>63878178
Dang ol' treeniggers I tell ya what man need to get my dang ol' pelts yo son was a lil dang ol' bitch uh-huh
>>63877354
>only men rape
Get out of here femen scum
What does this have to do with TFA? Post on the right fucking board
is a horse an oscar winner?
>>63882210
>copying Star Wars
Bravo Inarritu!
Would I like this movie if I've hated all of Inarritu's previous work? The trailers look great, the cast is great, and they chose great subject matter. But I'm just afraid that Inarritu will blow it like he always does, and make a pretentious bore with no subtlety.
>>63882406
>But I'm just afraid that Inarritu will blow it like he always does, and make a pretentious bore with no subtlety.
No you won't like it.
>>63874783
post yfw
>"and the Oscar goes to.... MICHAEL FASSBENDER!!! FOR STEVE JOBS!!"
>>63882473
Did you like it?
I usually just get annoyed by his dialogue, and this story seems like it wouldn't really have much dialogue.
>>63881343
scalp me once - shame on you
scalp me twice - won't get scalped again
I liked the unforgiving nature of most of the movie. Leo does a great job but for the most part it's just kind of boring. The opening/ending are highlights, the middle 3rd of the movie drags on much too long.
6.5/10, bumped to 7.5/10 because some of the long shots are incredible.
>>63882672
I like it but I'm a big fan of Inarritu and this different than what he's done in the past but nevertheless it has his signature all over it. It has a strong opening with lots of long shots, the middle is slower and more about the character, with the third act having the characters accepting their fate. The themes of the movie are both about survival and revenge. But if you've hated all of his previous movies and you see them as pretentious then you're gonna find the same pretentiousness here too.
guys it's not even out yet
>>63883074
there's a DVD Screener in a pretty good quality, as far as early rips go
is this leos least annoying role yet?
>>63883183
unfortunately no
>m-muh wife
>>63883300
at least he's not screaming every line as some dumbass eccentric character like most of his recent roles.
his character is enjoyable if not a bit one dimensional.
9.6/10 revenge Story would have felt stronger and more meaningful if they built up the sons relationship with the father a bit better. And If he was white.
Other then that very comfy and atmospheric will def buy the blu ray
>>63874855
>>63875065
>>63875110
>>63875151
>>63875145
>>63875415
> Mfw Oscar members are so lazy they watch shit quality screeners
> Mfw the Oscars are spouse to be the most prestigious film award in the world
> Mfw members cant be bothered to go to a cinema
>>63884096
> Mfw Oscar members are so lazy they watch shit quality screeners
I thought this was a joke at first but then I realized that all these rips we watch are made from actual press / award screeners with identical quality. Ridiculous.
>>63874783
8/10 movie. Perfect camaera work and great editing but the story didn't have that much of an emotional impact on me as I hoped. The acting was great and intense, though. A good maybe great movie but nothing revolutionary.
8/10 the camera work and cinematography and acting were all top notch
Characters were meh but realistic I guess
I found it odd that everyone was so loyal to Di Caprio (other than Fitzgerald of course) to the point where they would kill/risk their own life for him
>>63884613
>I found it odd that everyone was so loyal to Di Caprio (other than Fitzgerald of course) to the point where they would kill/risk their own life for him
I think it was because he knew his way around better than everyone else.
>>63884613
I like your style
Movie was too long too start, could have been cut down half an hour and been as effective. The first hour is all set up, so we basically see
>10 minute Indian attack
>5 minute of whitey walking
>5 intense minute bear attack
>40 minutes of Leo lying down making down sydrome noises
Got boring, sped up in the middle a bit, enjoyed the part with the good indian dude, didn't really give a shit about Leo's dreams. Shame is took Leo two hours to recover and 15 minutes to get his revenge.
Liked the brutality of the movie, liked the camera work, wished it went along at a little faster pace, liked Tom Hardy, liked Domhall Gleeson, didn't expect him to pull of a gruff frontiersman but he did well - didn't like that fucking kid who looks like Sid from Toy Story, he needs to GTFO out of films tbqh senpai.
>>63874783
I saw the leaked version yesterday.
It was pretty good. I liked the cinematography more than Birdman. There were obvious cuts but there were countless times a scene was a long take and it was so organic.
Some scenes were fucking great and Dicaprio is a genuinely good actor. The climax scene near the end was also some nice "outfucking skilled" moment.
My main problem with the movie is the visions of the main guy were too frequent unlike in Biutiful. There were also two scenes involving his dead wife floating around which looked downright silly.
I liked it more than Birdman but not as much as Biutiful
I liked the movie. A bit too drawn out though and I didn't like how some characters ended up. Especially Domhnall Gleeson, made no sense to me desu
>>63884613
i dont think it was the fact they were loyal to him but more just loyal and honerable in general. they would do anything to not leave a mate behind, and when they found out one of their own betrayed another one of their own they completely dissowned him.
>>63884096
>mfw some of them don't even watch the movie they are voting on.
>>63884613
They kept on saying he was their guide.
Also
>pre 1900 guns actually killing people with one shot
>bows one shotting people
For all its realism some shit annoys me at times
>>63885335
>assumes musket balls aren't more deadly than small bullets
>expecting people to take an arrow as if nothing happened
>using the term "one shotting"
>anime picture
hahahahaha
Did anyone feel the whole indian guy looking for his daughter subplot to be a bit underdone for the length of this movie? What did it actually accomplish? Did they need some way to make the white man evil instead of just having the indians want to steal the pelts and sell to the french? She really had no purpose and the scene where glass stop the guy from raping her feels rushed and underdone. Nothing would have changed if you removed the daughter besides maybe the ending?
>>63885310
It doesn't help that animation is shit tier in terms of variety.
I was shocked at first but as time passed I realized "Yeah the oscar would probably go to Pixar. I mean shit like Despicable me and the like are just mediocre".
If Peanuts was nominated I probably won't watch it since I never really fucking cared for Snoopy and all reviews are basically saying "It has obvious issues but hey your kids won't notice them."
>>63884613
>Characters were meh but realistic I guess
I know what you mean. It's a double edged sword really. If it was any other "Movie" character, Leo would be constantly talking to himself screaming MUH BOY however in this he acts like more like a human being. The only true character in this was Tom Hardy and that Captain guy who both played their roles perfectly in the story.
>>63885335
this >>63885415
If someone shoots an arrow in your face you will die
A lot of characters fall down after being shot, I don't think we see anyone die instantly from being shot in the chest or what have you, e.g.Fitz is shot in the final encounter and keeps going for quite a while
Modern weaponry is meant to maim
How big is a bears penis? How much can someone take in their ass before damage occurs?
>>63885603
>le meme forcing man
>>63885603
There was no bear rape hell it was female.
It was just mauling.
Was it cgi?
>>63885509
it gave the indians a reason to be a constant threat throughout the movie, that's why.
>>63881320
Its leaked, idiot
>>63885603
were you giggling like an autist when you wrote your epic meme?
>>63885509
Didn't the Indians attack the French after the princess got away?
That why the Frenchman who looked desperate managed to get to the camp holding the canister that made them realize Dicaprio was still alive
>>63885586
Forget arrows, you can take a bullet to the face and still keep kicking for a while. All depends where it lands.
I think you see a few guys get insta-killed throughout the boat scene but in fairness, it's a movie so who really cares about it. Come to think of it I can really think of a modern movie which deals with weaponry, death and medical treatment realisticly outside of war docuemntaries
wish i watched in theaters/10
>>63885767
So the whole point of the Injun plot was to get the cannister back to the camp so the rest of the expedition would know Leo is alive?
Why did the Frenchman even bring them the cannister? Wouldn't he have his own? Why would he make a point to show them?
>>63885841
Meh, the sounds and score weren't anything too special. If anything I'll watch it again on Bluray to fully take in the shots.
>>63882210
inb4 pepe gets shooped into horse
very nicely shot but as far as dicaprios character it felt like the director payed the recent tomb raider games and thought "hey i wanna do that shit in my film!".
i just couldnt stop cringing at all the ridiculous shit he kept surviving
>>63886005
My biggest gripe was when he fell off the cliff. Everything up to there, sure, whatever. Maybe he dried off and survived hypothermia after being in the river, maybe the bear didn't crush every bone in his body, maybe all his wounds didn't get infected and he didn't get gangrene.
But he fucking fell off like a 50 foot cliff and his wounds miraculously DIDN'T all reopen and his bones somehow didn't break and he was able to get up and sleep inside a horse. All of this happens after avoiding getting hit ONCE by like 15 chasing indians, all shooting at him.
That shit was stupid.
>>63885952
the movie looks beautiful at times, I'd just like to see it more clearly and on a larger scale.
>>63886005
The most ridiculous shit was the bear attack which the real Glass did survived.
Tom Hardy stole the show, Leo was nothing special. The kid that was with Hardy for most of the movie was pretty good too.
>>63884096
I am an awards voter. They have many screenings of the films, and the Revenant screening I went to was full.
Then I watched it a second time, on the screener they sent, which was a blu-ray and of excellent quality.
the scenery was amazing in this and i cant wait for the blu ray. i wonder if some of it was cgi tho just like the animals.
it looked too sureal at times.
>>63875415
they did send out blu ray screeners
>>63874783
I loved it through and through. Dicaprio was fucking horrible though.
>>63886324
the bear looked pretty good. that scene with the wolves attacking the buffalo looked godawful.
>>63886270
Are you gonna vote for Leo?
Is this the most expensive art film of all time? Don't get me wrong, I loved it, but there's no way it earns its budget back. It's too slow and poetic for normie cinema goers. The action is brilliant though.
>>63886378
I can't vote to nominate in acting awards/categories.
My wife was on the SAG nominating committee and she didn't vote to nominate him. She did vote to nominate Tom Hardy.
it's ham-fisted and monotonous like all of inaraiaiaataau's movies but when stuff is actually happening it's pretty cool. to me this is way better spectacle than something like star wars. bear rape is 10/10.
>>63885659
Probably a mix of practical effects and CGI, it looks fucking fantastic though, best scene in the movie
>>63886324
Why would the scenery be CG? It's not an alien planet or something. I could see the tree that was on fire and toppling over being CGI maybe. Also the tree he fell into, perhaps. Otherwise, it just looks like Canada.
>>63886496
>My wife was on the SAG nominating committee and she didn't vote to nominate him. She did vote to nominate Tom Hardy.
>/tv/ was right
>>63886467
>Budget: $135 million
I'm guessing losses of $100+ million
why do people think the bear raped leo?
it doesn't even look like it's happening. the bears on top of leo. that's what bears do. they stand on shit. baka.
>>63886549
>/tv/ was right
meaning?
>>63886467
>poetic
it's the high budget western with the most basic revenge plot that has handful of useless artsy garbage thrown in to serve as an Oscar bait
luckily it's pretty damn good western, so all is forgiven
>>63886618
It was memed that Leo won't win shit but Hardy will take an Oscar for that role
>>63886574
>I'm guessing losses of $100+ million
Shit, you're probably right. I already saw the screener twice but I'll make sure to buy a ticket on January when it opens in my country. This is how I want my big budget films to look like, so I'll sacrifice 10 euros of my NEET bucks.
>>63886664
Right. But she also didn't vote for Redmayne - she hated that fucking movie. Her votes didn't really count, it seems, she voted for Michael Caine in youth and Ian McKellen in Mr. Holmes - I don't think she's indicative of anything.
>>63886658
>useless artsy garbage thrown in to serve as an Oscar bait
>/tv/ in charge of reviewing
>>63886324
While I don't doubt that a lot of it was retouched with cgi. From what I read about the movie was that it was very difficult to make because the director wanted to use as much natural lighting as possible and the actors having to withstand the cold, which implies they were actually doing a lot of shooting in the wilderness.
>yfw da bear wins the oscarb owl before leo does
>>63884096
>Oscars
>prestigious
are you actually serious? it sounds worryingly like you're actually serious
>>63886950
top kek
![1450644084030[1] copy.png](https://i.imgur.com/4M4qZyb.png "1450644084030[1] copy.png")
>>63885985
>>63886950
/sp/ go home
>check recent reviews on letterboxd
>see this
kek
in the bear scene, wouldnt the bear have left him alone after the first atack if left unprovoked and dicaprio had pretended to be dead?
>>63877833
>pretentious
The true mark of the pleb, they can't articulate for shit their "opinion" so they resort to buzzword they learned of their first week on /tv/.
Stick to star wars threads, kiddo.
What's with the spiral though
>>63886860
doesnt this guy also love to make exceptionaly long shots? im sure that cost a lot as well.
>>63887088
it probably would have
I think he thought that he'd kill it with one shot in the head, plus he wanted to kill it so that if his people came for him to help, the bear wouldn't have mauled them too.
>>63886270
>Then I watched it a second time, on the screener they sent, which was a blu-ray and of excellent quality.
Dude. You would be a legend if you leaked a BD screener.
>>63887142
it was just so that when it was found it was without a doubt the guys canteen since he drew the snail shell on it
Just finished it
What a terrible film
>>63887159
Long shots save money, but not time certainly
It was great. Ignore all the star wars fanboys saying it was garbage.
The Indian plot seem kinda half baked and only really served to move along the main story line.
>>63874783
I've got the screener disk sitting on my desk, but I'm waiting to watch it on Christmas Eve with my senpai, senpai.
Try hard the film
>>63887601
I'd pick a better movie for the christmas eve tbqh famerino
that being said, it is a comfy movie and it takes place in the late december.
>>63881240
>wanted good entertainment bu i got a turd, that is regarded as art by the guy that shitted out.
My dad is going to love this, he liked The Road and The Grey a lot
Pelts can drive a man crazy.
>>63887245
>Long shots save money
nigga what? with long shots there's a fuck ton of choreography and rehearsal(for Gravity alone it was 1 year), every time there's a mistake they have to set up again, and a lot of long shots do have cuts but they are stitched together in editing
Hackariittuu is this year's "DUDE I'M SUCH A CINEPHILE LMAO" pseudo-artistic director, whereas Steve McQueen was in that position before.
Always cute to watch redditors clumsily use film vocabulary to argue why these middle-brow "artists" are any good, trying to move on from adoring Nolan and Breaking Bad. lmao
Casting DiCaprio was a mistake. There's just something about his face that makes him more suitable for playing a slimy Wall Street broker than a manly man like Hugh Glass
The parts with natural filming in extreme conditions were impressive though, so you gotta give Leo the credit where it's due
>>63887663
That's all art, M. Night Famalam
>>63887245
Time is money on a film set. Long shots can cost a lot, especially when you're shooting with only 4 hours of available light.
>>63887741
>that feel when my dad absolutely loves this types of movies and I used to watch them with him, but he died when I was 19
>>63887858
Villeneuve is worse
>>63887858
What films from this year did you enjoy?
>>63887858
>if you like widely known directors/movies you're a pleb redditor
flawless logic you got there kiddo
>>63887933
Villeneuve has a pretty solid filmography. His films are never perfect but they're ok.
Inarritu only has Birdman, everything else is trash.
>>63886270
>the screener they sent, which was a blu-ray and of excellent quality
>BR screener
well memed :^)
>>63888398
at this point his best films are
Amores Perros>Birdman>The Revenant
>>63886178
Hardy kept jumping from his Bane voice to his normal voice
>>63888442
>>63886270
I'm just a journo, not an awards voter, but no one ever sent me a BR screener in the last 5 years. They're always DVD.
Wonder if I got cucked out
>>63887660
We wanted to watch the screeners we got in, but there wasn't anything anyone was that excited about other than Revenant. While we know it will be sort of dark we wanted that comfy cold outside feel and thought watching Leo freeze to death was the best option.
>>63888442
I don't know what you're getting at
>>63888665
This is the only Blu Ray screener I've ever received
>>63887933
Only Enemy was pretentious
The rest were crowd pleaders with 8+ imdb
>>63888809
why don't you share anon? are you so selfish?
They stole the sleeping inside a dead horse during a blizzard scene from Starwars
>>63888943
I'm very selfish
What's the point of shooting in all natural lighting if you're just going to fuck it up with ugly grey colorizing in post-production?
>>63889340
The look is appropriate to the action in the film
Prettygoodbutforgettable/10
I didn't understand the last scene. Did Glass become a Jedi at the end of the movie? Is that why he saw the ghost of his wife?
>>63890681
Well he did gut a horse and hide inside it to survive against a blizzard like Luke
2/10.
It is phenomenally terrible. Like, I knew that Inarritu is a bad director, but I thought maybe this movie could work, with a simple story and such great cinematography. Except Inarritu did literally everything wrong, from the cheesy and unbelievable B-movie screenplay to the disappointing lack of suspense or any kind of grippiness in the scenes where Leo DiCaprio "survives" on his own due to there being cuts every 30 seconds to other characters or to Leo himself at a rapidly progressed point.
>>63874783
8/10, couldn't understand a word Hardy said though
>>63887911
at least you got dubs
I liked the movie's atmosphere and setting but leo really came off as trying hard to get that oscar. Half the movie was leo crawling through snow breathing hard. All the other characters were good though.
>>63886005
This.
>>63886005
You do know the real Glass actually survived ridiculous shit, right?
>>63891311
>>63891494
Try harder you permavirgin.
7.5/10
I really wanted to love it, but it was missing something
really beautiful cinematography tho
>>63890370
The director and DP go on and on about nature, and wanting things to look "real". If that's the case, give us natural fucking color, not the same tired, hamfisted "mood"-infusing grey/blue/orange bullshit you see in so many modern dramas.
>The camera lens fogs up when the CGI bear breathes near it.
>>63888943
do they watermark these? i remember there was some album a while ago that a journalist leaked with a hidden watermark that almost got them fire
7/10.
Took the womb symbolism too far. Man crawls out of one womb, that's interesting. Man crawls out of two wombs, that's a bit much. Man crawls out of three wombs...goddaamnit.
Rather watch Seraphim Falls.
I'm going to go ahead and say it.
MASTERPIECE!
9/10
Leo did great
>>63890681
He also saw the camera
>>63891311
Thor, are you gay?
>>63886005
Why do keep thinking about video games?
>>63875999
W-Why would a bear rape him?
Srs question.
Was he a race traitor tho ?
Even if it is a screener, this is hands down the most beautifully shot movie of the year.
Unfortunately, the story and characters aren't as good.
This is 11/10 visuals with 6/10 everything else.
>>63874953
He'll definitely get a nomination and I'm bold enough to say he could potentially get the win. Leo will go home empty handed.
>>63891835
If there is a personalized code, it is hidden. There's only one on-screen for your consideration watermark at the halfway point on the Blu Ray
>>63891742
Am I the only one who likes this kind of shit? Especially when water droplets are on the camera lens.
>>63886094
Fully fucking agree.
They took the concept of plot armor to new highs on that scene.
>inb4 tree broke his fall.
He would still be back to near death state.
>>63874783
it's a 9/10. brilliant fucking movie. brilliant fucking movie. and yeah, the Brit took it. Matt Hardy owned it. Leo acted superbly but Matt was a slimy snake throughout. is it matt hardy or tom hardy. anywho, the nigger from star trek nemesis, yeah him, what a slippery punk.
how did his leg recover so fast? how did all those injuries from the bear attack didn't get infected? how does he not get a fever for riding down the river in below zero temperature?
>>63877833
Star Wars that'a'ways youngin'.
>>63895915
>Matt Hardy owned it. Leo acted superbly but Matt was a slimy snake throughout. is it matt hardy or tom hardy.
Matt Hardy is a wrestler; Tom Hardy is an actor.
>>63887142
The kid was a naruto-loving weeb.
>>63887741
You're dad has good taste.
And he will certainly like this.
>>63887870
Switch Leo and Hardy's characters and you'd have a much better movie.
>>63894578
>he doesn't know the bear on human rape statistics
Do you think dolphins are the only animals known to rape humans?
>>63882210
literal poetry tbqh f.am
>>63895630
>>63886094
Are you guys fuggin serious, this shit was based on real events lmao
>>63875999
gimme that manboipussy.
>>63888618
His normal voice sounds nothing like the Bane voice or the voice he used in this movie, which was scaled back a bit from the Bane voice
>>63887026
Nice
