IT'S FUCKING HERE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvsiJppCdmk
>>63869247
YOU WIN THE INTERNET! THANK YOU OP!
I can't stand these...oh fuck yeah!
This may be the first HITB where I can't watch the spoiler part of the review
Even if it's a movie I want to see, I still want to watch the spoiler half of their reviews. But unfortunately I've been to lazy to go to the theater yet
>>63869247
>42 minutes
absolutely based
"I've seen it... it sucks"
B A S E D
A
S
E
D
>>63869247
/tv/ BTFO Literally everyone was wrong about what they were gonna say
Based fucking Rich
BASED RICH
>>63869354
Rich hating it was kinda obvious though
STICKY
T
I
C
K
Y
>giving a fuck about a reviewer
Have fun with your sheep.mentality. who cares what others think. If you enjoyed it then good for you. If not we'll you have shit taste cause the film was a solid 10/10
It's time.
This one's gonna be a doozy.
>>63869247
>yfw they filmed this at 4:00am, right after they saw the movie
>yfw they rushed to make this for us
>yfw Mike and Jay love us
>>63869247
>Toggle
God dammit, Rich Evans is actually losing weight.
they've gone soft, and I noticed it first with Jurassic World.
fuck. yes.
newcomers skip to 2:40
>>63869423
>enjoying a movie means you've "gone soft"
Must suck living in your world
>>63869247
B A S E D RLM
A
S
E
D
R
L
M
>i loved it
>the fat blob manchild thats so immature he actually looks like a baby that is rich evans is the one who hates it
"It was everything I wanted it to be."
HATERS BTFO
>>63869408
>reviews film
>bitches about giving a fuck about a reviewer
so why should anyone if a fuck about your review? Have fun with your sheep mentality.
that fat santa guy is kinda full of shit, I like the guy on the right more. especially that part about the characters "doing the same shit they were doing 30 years ago" when it's really not.
who are these guys anyway??
>star wars is a feminist landmark
Welp, RLM is dead.
BASED RICH
>Rich Evans is the only one with some balls
This is the first time I'm watching this channel, why does /tv/ like these guys again?
RLM has gone
FULL SHILL
U
L
L
S
H
I
L
L
> Four thirty in the morning
Confirmed madmen
MIKE LOVED IT
NO PLINKETT REVIEW CONFIRMED
>Jay : It didn't feel calculated
Did he watch the fucking movie?
>>63869532
They did this one thing like eight years ago
>>63869247
Finally I'll know the correct opinion to have on this movie
>well... I loved it...... it was everything I hoped it would be! *voice breaks*
holy shit, Mike's going to cry he's so relieved it was good
>>63869247
>they are the reason why every fedora on the internet hates PT
>they loved the mediocre remake of ANH
AHAHAHAHAHA
>I liked the fun creatures design
Jay used to be my husbandu, no more.
all my fuckin keks
>>63869548
He loves Titanic too, and he liked Star Trek '09
>>63869423
>They've gone soft because they didn't validate my opinion
You're pretty dumb desu
TEARS IN HIS EYES IT WAS SO GOOD
TFA HATERS B T F O
I love these guys, I love their love for Star Wars. It's tempered by cynicism, but you can tell they care.
Merry Christmas, RLM.
>inb4 /tv/'s opinion of TFA changes overnight to be mostly positive
>>63869556
What thing?
>>63869620
>mfw this literally happens
>>63869613
>i need a reviewer to tell me my point is more valid than others. My life has meaning now
>RLM finally blows their entire credibility out of the water by liking this mediocre cash grab trash
RLMfag BTFO
>>63869620
>overnight
It's been like this since most American posters watched it like a day ago
Mike: I LOVED IT!
Jay: I LOVED IT TOO!LITERALLY FUCKING DROPPED
They even like the hobbit 3 orc. What absolute plebs.
>>63869584
The Plinkett Reviews were the result of prequel hate, not the cause
How long till Jay turns jaded and hates it?
>>63869656
I bet you said the same thing after their Jurassic World review, but here to are back for more
thanks for supporting RLM, and considering donating to our patreon if you want more content
>Jay: I also really really liked The Force Awakens, it worked in all the ways that Jurassic World did not
haters and dinofags getting the nooses ready
They may like it, but I still don't. That's fine. Everyone is allowed to have their opinions.
>>63869647
Yea but there was alot of people hating on it just because they thought Mike would
Rich is the new alpha of the bunch
>>63869686
There was literally nobody like that.
I really, really don't understand the J.J dick sucking they have over at RLM.
I can't fathom it
>>63869247
a glib facsimile
>>63869549
He's not ignorant to how the movie was put together. He's talking about it not feeling transparent in the final product.
How many views is it going to peak at on YT?
>>63869247
what a bunch of faggots, always knew they would keep it safe space. Fucking sellouts
are these guys serious? the movie sucked big time.
I hope this review is a joke and at the end they will say that the movie SUCKS (I am at the 8th minute)
>>63869247
>Red Meme Media liked it
/TV/ ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>63869695
They all disliked Into Darkness
>>63869584
The Force Awakens is better than the prequels. If you think otherwise your brain is broken.
>>63869694
Have you literally missed all the RLM threads since the movie came out?
>>63869656
>blows their entire credibility
Wow you take this internet reviewing thing pretty seriously, anon.
>>63869710
Well, did he watch the movie?
>>63869724
Literally nobody was hating it just because they thought he would, they already hated it
MIKE LOVED IT HAHAHAHA
>RED LETTER SHILLMEDIA BOUGHT BY DISNEY
even max landis blasted this piece of crap
They don't even have a problem with Mary Sue being magically overpowered.
>>63869682
>thanks for supporting RLM, and considering donating to our patreon if you want more content
I already have! THANKS BASED RED LETTER MEDIA!
Please give Rich Evans a big fucking hug for me! And congratulate him on his continued weight loss! He is looking good!
>>63869682
I didn't watch this shit nor their Jurassic World review. I never watch their reviews because I'm not fucking reddit who devotes himself to follow one hit wonder jewtuber reviewers.
>it just felt like a solid Star Wars sequel
>a better star wars sequel than Return of the Jedi I'd say
haters putting the rope around their necks
>they hate every aspect of the prequels
>TFA is the opposite of the prequels in almost every way
Makes sense doe
TRAITORS
>>63869688
>Rich is now my favorite because he validates my opinion more
Fucking idiots in these threads.
>I loved it
Nooooooooooo
>>63869748
Are they really Jewish? Source?
>>63869272
I came into this thread to remind everyone that these guys are cancer and the first post I see is an obvious redditor.
Can you not go over r/redditlettermedia instead of shitting up this board?
>>63869247
FUCK YOU MIKE AND JAY FUCKING SELLOUTS
>>63869744
>Max Landis
>Victor Frankenstein
>American Ultra
Opinion discarded
>>63869695
They HATED Into Darkness.
Jay even mentions how much it sucked in this very review.
>literally making excuses for the flaws of the movie: the review
LITERALLY BOUGHT OFF
This is too funny. Those shills are bought off by disney. It's clear as fuck.
When even a guy like max landis who is deep in the hollywood machine realizes what a turd TFA was the rlm retards blew their entire credibility
>>63869776
Jay literally is
>>63869748
>devotes himself to shitposting and bitching about people liking something he doesn't like
you're worse than reddit. Seriously consider what you're doing with your life, go outside or something
>>63869748
>jewtubes
>everyone is juden
Ohh /pol/. You so dumb.
>one of them hates it
>one of them literally says Disney's PR lines
>one of them acts as intermediary
JESUS WHO COULD HAVE ANTICIPATED THIS
>>63869247
>thread gets posted, nothing
>clone thread gets posted minutes later with clickbait image, marketer lines and titles, boom replies
/tv/ just say you love shills and marketers
>>63869247
>recognize it rips off a new hope
>still like it
oh, they are retarded.
>>63869723
It's a well-made movie, prequels were not. But prequels were bad Star Wars movies, this one isn't Star Wars movie at all
>>63869756
>I need youtubers to validate my opinions
>If RLM likes it, all criticisms are invalid from here on out
wow, is there anyone more pathetic than the guys who follow these assholes?
>>63869793
yep, its so fucking obvious that they are bought.
Jay is such a hack fraud. When he says the characters have actual impact, did he even watch the same movie?
>>63869793
>When even a guy like max landis
Bitter failure hates fun successful movie, more at 11
>>63869738
>Well, did he have the exact same opinion as me?
Apparently not, anon. That's how opinions work.
>the part where mike talks about bane
was he baneposting
>>63869815
>soft remake
wtf is a soft remake you shills
>1:45 in
>le heroes on both sides meme
That was a perfectly acceptable statement.
RotS Plinkett = Worst Plinkett.
They praise TFA for everything they blasted the prequels for.
They are so obviously in disney's pocket now.
>>63869247
> Daisy Ridley was great
Jesus fucking Christ /TV/, hold me
>>63869819
>wow, is there anyone more pathetic than the guys who follow these assholes?
Yes. There's this autist who follows them and shitposts in the threads. He likes to use reaction images, sort of like you.
Wait...maybe you're the asshole
So uhhh... I thought it was good
>>63869792
>literally making things up in greentext to validate my juvenile hatred of a pleasant space adventure movie: the post
>>63869797
>implying RLMfags aren't the real shitposters
>>63869779
>/tv/ is 99% FA threads
>liking FA = redditor
U WUT M8?
>>63869843
kill you are self tripcode faggot
It feels like they watched a completely different movie.
What is this shit?
>>63869819
>I got btfo because mike and jay, who's opinions I've been copying for over half a decade, disagree with me
>Star Wars haters expect RLM to bash it
>turns out they love it
>SHILLS!
>DISNEY BOUGHT THEM OFF
>THEY SOLD OUT
top fucking kek, /tv/ truly is the dumbest board
>>63869841
http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/63735500/#q63735500
>Mfw I beat RLM to inventing the term but now everyone will associate it with them
>>63869860
No, I'm implying YOU are the shitposter
There are heroes on both sides anon
>>63869817
> this one isn't Star Wars movie at all
Explain that to the people calling it an exact copy of A New Hope.
>>63869846
>They praise TFA for everything they blasted the prequels for.
Except they don't. Like, they don't do that at all. I didn't even really like TFA that much, but you're fucking retarded.
>>63869846
this
>>63869854
It was alright but it's not great. It's like capeshit with Star Wars paint.
>harrison ford looks like he gives a shit
>harrison ford was a lot of fun in this movie
WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY ON? This is the worst thing they ever did
>>63869793
the amount of money they should have been able to ask for given their status for fans should have been VERY large. they are easily worth 100k+
honestly I'm glad for them as in the long run it won't make any difference and they are taking money from Disney's profit margin.
>>63869853
>STOP HATING MY YOUTUBE ATTENTION WHORES
Mike has such a big smile on his face this whole review. He's so happy.mike confirmed for hackfraud
>>63869847
She was the worst part of the movie
THEY POINT TO EVERY SINGLE FAULT IN THE FILM WHILE SHRUGGING IT OFF OR EXCUSING IT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>63869873
I love Mike's serial killer look in this one
You do know these aren't "real" movie critics right?
I'm loving the tears, keep it up!
rlm have officially jumped the shark
>>63869847
She was the best part of the movie
>I'm excited to see these characters again
even Rich is coming around
>>63869892
Nah, Han was great.
>>63869855
>oh the movie is exactly the same than a new hope
>but it works because i say so
>oh they blow up another death star showing they have not creativity
>but it works because i say so
>oh this character doesn't do anything and really has not personality
>but it works because i say so
They just name obvious flaws and then dismiss them because they like the movie
>>63869881
he means they praise TFA for things it does no better than the prequels did.
>>63869919
They did in Jurassic World already
>>63869911
Yeah. This feels very much like the idiots praising EPISODE 1 right after they saw it.
>>63869916
realer than any other critic because they self-publish and don't have to toe their given party's line
>>63869846
>clear protagonist
>clear motivations for all the characters
>performances that aren't wooden
>practical sets and creatures
>thrust of the story is character drama and not lightsaber battles
Can you please provide examples of what the fuck you're talking about?
>>63869918
>LITERALLY figuratively
But that's false true you smart retard
>>63869921
Wrong. Kylo was
>>63869892
Compare Ford in this movie to his role in Crystal Skull. He is much better in TFA.
>>63869881
>Like
like ugh amirite, what is this? 1950 nazi germany?
COME ON NOW! It's 2015, how can you not cope to social media induced peer pressure to like a movie that is LITERALLY figuratively worse than phantom menace?
I MEAN COME ON NOW GUYS
>Literally nobody agrees with contrarian SW7 haters
>The butthurt is real
GLORIOUS
Posting in a meltdown thread
RLM IS FUCKING FINISHED
HACKS ACTUALLY SUGGEST THIS FILM IS GOOD
>>63869932
>They just name obvious flaws and then dismiss them because they like the movie
Yeah that's kind of how enjoying movies works, dipshit.
Jay hates the 360 too
>>63869953
spotted the redditor with broken irony detector
>>63869938
How can it remind you of 1999 if you're a 15 year old talking out of your ass
>>63869978
It is a review not a "we are gonna circlejerk for an hour about the disney corporation"
>>63869975
>ACTUALLY SUGGESTING THIS FILM IS GOOD
So does 99% of /tv/. Where have you been? Almost every fucking thread is FA pandering bullshit.
>>63869978
That's not how criticism works though. That's just ignoring genuine flaws because it fucking panders to you in some areas enough.
>>63869975
>implying they wont influence a huge portion of people who can't decide on their own with this video
Disney was saved once again
AHAHAHA
I CAN'T WAIT FOR MIKE & JAY TO BACKPEDAL ON THEIR PRAISE IN THE FUTURE.
>jay is literally reading off the press release
what the flying fuck is going on? bought off
>>63870000
How can you be so fucking stupid ffs
Ebert's 3.5 star review reads exactly like that
>>63869975
>95% on RT
>8.9 on IMDB
>breaks records on opening day
>RLM likes it
>no it's everyone other than me is wrong!
>>63870005
>So does 99% of /tv/.
So do a few shills and disney interns.
/tv/ hates the movie.
>>63869975
post yfw Hack Letter Media is finished
>>63869949
>clear protagonist
>clear motivations for all the characters
no, not at all.
a lot of things happen in the film just by pure coincidence and characters just behave according to our expectations of how characters in a Star Wars film should behave.
>>63869978
They're reviewing a movie supposedly objectively, but instead they are just reviewing it based on their enjoyment like hackfrauds
>>63870040
>I'm a sexy cartoon cat
Uhh....okay?
>>63870030
Avatar is around 80% on both and they shat on it
>>63869885
Even worse.
They like the lame quipps and whedon tier snark.
In Avengers it pissed them off and now they love it and jay calls it "scrappy characters"
What the shit is wrong with them?
>>63870011
They don't ignore the flaws. They point out what they felt didn't work in the movie, but that didn't bog down their overall enjoyment because it gets the "fun space adventure" stuff right and has likable characters. They explain pretty clearly why they liked it. You're just butthurt they're not validating your opinion.
>They loved it
Who would have guessed
>>63870026
Why can't I find wave after wave of positive 1999 reviews? Why do I only ever find condemnation of it initially?
>>63870030
>breaks records on opening day
>still hasn't made its money back
>won't beat Avatar
>will just barely even beat Jurassic World if lucky
>being a drone
>>63870039
>/tv/ hates the movie
Holy shit this denial.
>>63870039
>99% of /tv/ threads are circle jerks about FA
>but /tv/ hates the movie
>>63870030
>Literally the same as TPM
Real life POETRY
>>63870039
don't say /tv hates it
You'll aggro people telling you're a contrarian for the sake of if, because your life supposedly sucks. It's a lost cause
>>63870026
This.
The critics and the normies gobbled up tpm. It was angry internet nerds and "contrarians" that hated it.
The hype died down, the hate stayed.
>>63869247
>tfw they made episode 100 the big star wars movie
Perfect timing
>>63870057
They didn't love it, but they didn't exactly give it the prequel treatment.
Why is it so unbearable to some of you faggots that people enjoy a movie more than you?
Who'd thought Rich was the only non-pleb
>>63870039
>/tv/ is one person
Hello gaiaonline
>>63870057
Avatar's critical reception and RLM's view of it compared to TFA is literal proof of the fact that the media just sells reviews.
>>63870075
>hasn't made it's money back in 2 days
>will barely become the third highest grossing movie of all time
Oh, what flop. You sure showed me.
>>63870082
90% of the circlejerks are redditors and disney interns trying to drum up hype for the movie by astroturfing
>>63870058
>mfw the plinkett reviews was a commission by disney to get everyone to hate the prequels so that no matter what the new star wars movie was people would love it
>>63870039
>/tv/ hates the movie.
>>63870058
>They like the lame quipps and whedon tier snark.
So what you're saying is you've never seen any of the original Star Wars movies.
>>63870058
$$$
>>63870113
>it's all a vast Disney conspiracy
You have a mental disorder
>>63870075
What would you do If It does break 2bn?
Remember Anon point it towards your brain, not towards the back of your throat
So is it a running gag that people here think RLM gets paid by studios for positive reviews or are there actually people on /tv/ that are genuinely this stupid?
>>63870084
The reviews were horribly mixed in 1999, asswipe.
>>63870093
Again this is a review, it is supposed to have some sort of objectivity.
>Doing the review RIGHT after they watched it
No wonder they liked it. It took me a day to realize how fucking awful it was, I came out of the theater going "alright that wasnt so bad". Then I actually gave some thought to the movie and started coming up with a million reasons why its not good.
>>63870074
Because you don't know how to scroll down apparently
You guys can make fun of me for posting this, go for it.
This is such a letdown. I enjoy Half In The Bag, I like how casual it is and in general I like listening to people talk about movies.
RLM has either been bought out or has completely lost their edge. Every single criticism they applied to the prequels can easily be applied to TFA. But they aren't even half heartedly having a crack.
Not even going to finish episode 100. I'm thinking this means no more Plinkett, might as well be considered a closed character.
>>63870137
The funny thing is haters actually believe this shit. They can't comprehend most people like the movie, and they're a minority.
>>63870000
Hi there!
You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of 4chan are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!
Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!
>>63870141
>actually people on /tv/ that are genuinely this stupid?
Only the /pol/ and /x/ cross-posters
>>63870104
>Who'd have thought Rich would be chosen to give the illusion of impartiality
it's because he isn't normally in Half In The Bag as a critic. Mike and Jay "represent" the show more so they had to like it.
I like how jay sarcastically brushes aside the criticism of TFA like it's just angry nerds when their entire shtick was that they made a 9 hour nerdy rant about the prequels.
>>63869247
The amount of samefagging in this thread is painful
People being this mad some more people didn't like the movie. Jeez chill
note the inferior mental capacities of the Rey hater
>>63870169
>he really believes that movie studios don't astroturf in internet
Is the cheapest form of publicity.
>>63870162
Shhhhhh, he doesn't want you to prove him wrong
>I liked Kylo Ren alot
holy shit Jay is a fucking moron
>>63870111
it won't even get into the top 10 movies of all time if you account for inflation
it might not even beat Jurassic World as it is underperforming overseas compared to that film.
the illusion that Star Wars is some kind of one-of-a-kind cultural juggernaut is just part of how they try to sell the film at this point.
The way jay is stressing the "likeable characters" really makes it seem he was given keynotes about how to praise the movie.
>>63870062
No, that's not objective reviewing. They're not judging the merit of the film as a film in the overall scheme of things. They're pointing out flaws but not weighing them against the good in a real manner.
It's like saying a bitch who gives good head is pretty because she gives you good head when the quality of her looks has nothing to do with whether her tongue licks you in the right places to make you bust.
>>63870181
>People being this mad some more people didn't like the movie
What post is about that? What thread are you in?
>the most verbal detractors of the prequel trilogy
Of course the movie was designed to pander to them, leaving them satisfied.
>>63870148
also gives them plausible deniability which is smart.
>Vote Trump!
What did he mean by this?
>the story sucks but it's just a backdrop for the character drama
So.... just like the prequels then?
What is their problem with the prequels again?
>>63870140
>break 2bn
good joke
>>63870193
Maybe you're the moron.
>>63870166
>You guys can make fun of me for posting this, go for it.
Thanks for your permission.
You're a faggot.
You're a stupid, pathetic faggot if you feel genuinely "let down" because some internet reviewers didn't share your opinion on a dumbass Star Wars movie.
Holy shit did you guys get to the end? The entire vid was a Disney sellout joke. I was fucking DYING!!!
>>63870195
>the illusion that Star Wars is some kind of one-of-a-kind cultural juggernaut is just part of how they try to sell the film at this point.
And it's amazing the way people are buying right into it, I said it wasn't going to beat Avatar and I got hit with "You seriously think the MOST ANTICIPATED MOVIE OF ALL TIME isn't going to beat Avatar?!?!?!"
>>63870181
>200+ replies, 60 posters
it's like the same 4 kids, 2 saying it sucked the other 2 saying it didn't
The problem isn't really that they liked it. They can like whatever they want. The problem is that they list WORD FOR WORD the criticism that was voiced on /tv/ and by certain professional critics while glossing over it and shrugging it off. It's like they're aware of all of the film's problems but are unable to pass a negative judgement on it.
>>63870201
>that's not objective reviewing
When has RLM ever claimed to be objective reviewers or "real" critics? They don't even consider themselves that.
>>63869247
yfw they liked it and /tv/ was wrong
yfw over the next few weeks /tv/ will shift to an overwhelmingly positive opinion of TFA
>what this movie had to do was to reestablish star wars as THE STARWARS you like and it DOES that
lol they sound like they are bought off for sure
>>63870216
In the prequels the story was a backdrop for the cgi.
>>63870221
And yet here you are, essentially equally as upset in the exact same thread as me
Something for you to think about maybe Anon
I'm surprised they liked this generic shit as mich as they did.
>>63870193
too deep 4 ya pleb
>>63870216
How is that like the prequels? In the prequels, the shitty story is a backdrop for shitty characters with confusing motivations and no emotional depth.
A better example would be the original trilogy, as they point out in this episode.
>>63870245
Then why does anyone on this board care about their opinions so much? Do people just get off on youtubers repeating what they already feel or believe?
>>63869247
>yfw 37:40
>yfw "Butt they are paid by DISNEY" Conspiracy THEORISTs" BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
>>63870162
There's 2.5 pages of rotten reviews, 2.5 pages of fresh reviews, with much of the fresh being apologist-esque. That's the 50% confirmed rotten it has today and the 15 years of reviews since have kept track with that pattern. You're only imagining a massive backlash after an initial praise, opinions were mixed-to-negative from the word go.
>Bane jokes
Do they even hide their fan service? wow.
>>63870245
>Review: a critical appraisal of a book, play, film, etc. published in a newspaper or magazine.
>critical: expressing or involving an analysis of the merits and faults of a work of literature, music, or art.
Of course for the SJW who like these movies words mean something different, so no surprise there.
>they liked it
unsubscribed and called the cops
>>63870216
>it's just a backdrop for the character drama
like Kylo hating Han for no reason and Rey learning the Force by doing nothing and Finn wanting to join the Resistance because it's the right thing to do.
le character drama :)
>>63870244
>The problem isn't really that they liked it. They can like whatever they want. The problem is that they list WORD FOR WORD the criticism that was voiced on /tv/ and by certain professional critics while glossing over it and shrugging it off. It's like they're aware of all of the film's problems but are unable to pass a negative judgement on it.
This. Their entire plinkett reviews was blowing up those tiny snippets of criticism and making a huge deal out of it.
Now they shrug it off as "well it's a fun movie FUN YOU GUYS FUUUN" the prequels were also "fun"
>>63870244
You can enjoy movies despite flaws. This is a common thing amonst people that aren't jaded assholes that go into a movie looking for ways to hate it.
>it's like a soft reboot!
>>63870244
You can accept that there's negatives and still enjoy something.
Anybody who says everything about a movie is great or bad is a retard
>>63870266
>the shitty story is a backdrop for shitty characters with confusing motivations and no emotional depth.
What is finn's motivation? What is rey's motivation? The only one who has a "motivation" is kylo ren
>>63870280
>hurr durr /tv/ invented Bane
>>63869769
Whatever happened to cynical jaded Mike? Jurassic World and now this?
smdh tbqh
>>63870290
>iPhone /sp/lebs are the ones butthurt about Star Wars
Sounds about right
>Episode 100
THAT'S WHY THEY WERE SO LAZY ON HALF IN THE BAG
THEY PLANNED IT ALL ALONG THAT THE 100th EPISODE WILL BE THE STAR WARS ONE
At first I thought they were being too forgiving, but it seemed they were pretty accurate in their analysis. I'm not a big Star Wars fan so that's probably why I didn't like it as much as them.
The bigger problem is that Mike has some kind of personal vendetta against Episode I which actually wasn't that bad, so this movie being a bit better gets blown out of proportion
>I LOVED IT
I bet you do, asshole
>>63870302
Are you seriously asking that? It's all right there in the movie. You can disslike the movie all you want, but you can't just ignore the very clear character motivations that the movie provides.
>>63870302
>What is finn's motivation? What is rey's motivation?
It's fascinating that you don't know since both are directly stated to you
>check the individual poster count
>literally one guy replying to everyone who didn't like TFA with laughing reaction images
whoa so this is the power of astroturfing
>>63870283
>like Kylo hating Han for no reason
My theory is that most prequel defenders are somewhere on the autism spectrum so the inhuman prequel characters don't bother them, thanks for affirming that
If you get mad about a reviewer because they don't parrot your own opinion back at you then you're a total pleb
>>63870252
I dont understand that sentence. The movie is called EPISODE SEVEN. Why does it have to reestablish a franchise when you are supposed to have watched SIX MOVIES before it. IT DIDNT NEED TO BE A FUCKING REHASH
>>63870284
They went soft
>>63870302
>What is finn's motivation?
He doesn't want to die as just another unnamed stormtrooper
>What is rey's motivation?
To be with her family.
>>63870313
/tv/ invented baneposting
>>63870270
>do people get off on hearing Youtubers repeating what they believe
YES YOU FUCKING IDIOT ALL HUMANS DO THIS
We like the people we like because they think the same way as us
We select politicans based on how much our beliefs overlap with their platform
How the fuck can you not have figured this out
>>63869878
They actually used that term to describe the upcoming Gremlins sequel in the Krampus review
