>this kills the star wars
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428730/star-wars-demystified?target=author&tid=1152026
Armond White is That Nigga
Rey “leans in” when she grips the Skywalker light saber, so that feminists can rejoice at the Disney Corporation’s calculated political correctness (although Rey’s competence with weaponry contradicts liberals’ convenient attitudes toward gun control.
Holy shit.
>generic race traitor uncle tom
ugh..
i can't even..
>>63846274
POETRY
O
E
T
R
Y
>>63846280
Just...UGH! YOU KNOW?
>>63845439
JJ BTFO BY SOME CONTRARIAN NEGRO
This is the smartest review of this movie anybody here will ever read, even if they're too dumb to realize that. Glorious Armond is the one man standing against the tide of the fanboy shill machine.
>>63846280
>race traitor
>because he doesn't say "AYY YO HOL UP BIX NOOD MUH FUGGA" every 10 seconds like a retarded ape
>gay black man is the leftist shill machine's worst enemy
It's like poetry.
>>63845439
It's a very strange review, he compares completely unrelated things to political views or real-life events, is this really normal in USA? I enjoyed the language he used, but there's nothing subtle about attaching a literal agenda to something as puny as a movie review, especially when it's not asked for at all.
>>63846935
He's a republican
His Man of Steel review is still GOAT
>>63845439
>http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428730/star-wars-demystified?target=author&tid=1152026
sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes fun sci-fi is just fun sci-fi, and not an opportunity for some conservative cocksucker to critique the left. Jesus, take it easy Francis.
>>63847629
You'd have to have your head buried pretty deep in the sand to think that TFA is just a cigar after JJ's extreme leftist comments about being in a room full of white males and wanting to destroy them all etc.
Armond White is literally the greatest film critic who ever lived, (You) this if you agree
Based Armond White
>By now we all should know that there’s nothing of adult interest in Star Wars. Even when it premiered back in 1977, the sci-fi premise and comic-book characters were eclipsed artistically by the visionary spirituality of Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Yet the continued prominence of Star Wars signifies something that is politically serious, if not dreadful: The great renaissance of American filmmaking during the 1970s and its regeneration of film culture (when movies were seen as a vital means of approaching and understanding contemporary experience) were doomed by Star Wars’ pseudo-imaginative, non-campy rehash of escapist junk. Now, the rebooted, politically empty The Force Awakens suggests a boot stuck in the rear of film culture’s flabby remains.
>>63845439
has he ever had a review where agreed with the majority? this is telling
>>63847794
The majority of people are fucking retards
>>63845439
Armond your review is worth ONE QUARTER PORTION.
>>63847629
>Leads are a Mary Sue and an Affirmative Action boon
>Jew Jew Abrams openly says he chose actors because their skin wasn't white
>its just a cigar : ^ )
clickbait nigga liked transformers
>The Force Awakens is a bread-and-circuses carnival that is intended to keep millennial audiences docile. The Force Awakens is a bread-and-circuses carnival (disguised as “The Rapture,” a young videomaker told me) that is intended to keep millennial audiences docile. Maybe that explains the film’s unavoidable sell and both the media’s and the public’s desperate genuflection. Love of Star Wars is not love of cinema, just consumerist habit. The Star Wars Generation — that unfortunate rabble primed to see these films at the precise moment they were becoming culturally responsive — are not necessarily the audience the movie brats deserved; they’re spawn of Baby Boomer affluence and narcissism. Star Wars turned their natural curiosity and wonder into self-satisfaction, artificially dependent on media and merchandising (a tragedy also evident in Apple and Pixar evangelism). TV-show runner J. J. Abrams brings his game-changing banality to the Star Wars franchise. He follows the template as originated by Lucas and appeals to adolescent thralldom, keeping the brand recognizable. The Force Awakens is paced better than Star Wars’ other dismal episodes, yet it’s even more impersonal. There’s no visual or spiritual excitement
That is spot on
>It’s seldom realized that the movie brats’ films are essentially conservative, politically speaking. Yet, in the new millennium, filmgoers’ superficial political awareness makes them nostalgic for Star Wars to maintain the gullibility of their youth. Longing for innocence is all that the insipidness of the latest sequel, The Force Awakens, signifies. When director J. J. Abrams re-stages that primal moment, he does it for brand recognition, but so unimaginatively that it feels hackneyed.
Literal meme reviewer.
>>63847224
Anon, you seem to be using your critical thinking skills and your post didn't include phrases like "BASED ARMOND" or "BTFO"
>>63847794
Often. Recently Creed.
Vapid trash exercise in vocabulary with no legitimate criticism to be had. Forced and clumsy political interpretation. Most points are fragmentary observations or irrelevant segway without point or else arbitrarily deployed snark.
The content of the film visual or narrative is in fact not even discussed anywhere.
Regardless if you loved or hated TFA, If you found this review compelling you are a shit smeared retard.
>>63848406
wow calm down nerd stick swinger, its just a movie
>>63848406
>segwayYou're right though
>>63848406
>segway
>calling others a "shit smeared retard"
>>63848406
>segway
>>63848406
You're a fucking moron if you believe that film reviews need to be formalist. White's social commentary is perfectly valid.
>>63847302
>blacks are only allowed to be welfare scrounging dependent on the state subhumans who want more socialism
you are the problem
>>63848406
You forgot to use the dictionary on >segway
Unless you mean those mini-vehicles you can ride around.
>how to say a lot without saying anything: the article
>>63847302
>Why does our pet nigger have different opinions than those we have created for them?
He is the traitor.
>>63847749
(you)
>>63846274
Thats brilliant
>>63845439
Based Armond "King of /tv/" White
>>63845439
Based
>>63847302
You mean he's a member of the party that freed the slaves?
>>63847018
He's gay?
>>63846274
Based Armond
>>63846274
Based Armond throwing down once again
