This is the correct order and you know it bitchez
>>63812890
It's not better than any of the originals or Episode III. Fact.
>>63812890
FTFY
V>IV>VI>III=VII>II>I
I agree.
V>III>VII>Wrath of Khan>VI>I>IV>II
>>63812890
V > VI > VII > IV > I > III > II
But I is the best prequel
>>63812934
This is the correct ranking
Attack of the Clones is the worst prequel. It's actually unwatchable.
>>63812934
Episode VI is a meme
V>IV>VII=III>VI>II>I
Lol@falling for the phantom menace hype, better than prequels but not as good as OT
>>63812890
Close, but
V > IV > VII > VI >>>>>> III > I > II.
>>63812890
I>II>III>IV>V>VI>VII
>>63812890
>VII above any OT
so fucking cancer.
TFA > ESB > ANH > PM > ROJ > RoS > AOTC
>>63813045
This is retarded
>>63812890
IV>VI>V>Nothing else matters
>>63813029
>muh ewoks
6 was trash.
>>63813045
>TFA > ESB
Go to bed JJ.
>>63812890
IV, stop, destroy literally everything else.
>>63812890
this is right, I have no idea why people always rank I higher than II
>>63813072
Alright grandpa
>>63812890
V > III > IV > VII > VI > II > I
Only right order to be honest family
>>63813045
There's nothing above episode V, you can't argue with perfection
>>63812921
Episode III is complete garbage, there was zero sense of any danger, all the other sith lords got BTFO in 2 seconds, Anakin vs. Obi Wan might as well been a flashy dance sequence, and yet people still defend that garbage movie because it has one good scene where Obi Wan looks off in the sunset on Tatooine. Literally that is the only decent thing in Episode III, everything else is a stupid fucking meme that makes this board look more autistic than it already is.
>>63812890
I completely agree with you. Does this mean I'm a pleb?
Anyone that puts TFA above any of the movies grew up with the prequels and have capeshit sensibilities
Why bother listing the prequels at all? It's best if they're forgotten
This was better than Jedi though, even with the rehashed plot and Rey being almost too good at everything.
The only nonmeme answer is:
V > IV > VI > VII > III > I > II
7's right in the middle like everyone knew it would be. Average as fuck.
>>63813216
The scene you describe, the ending of the movie, is literally better than anything in VII. And as bad as those movies were, they weren't written like TV episodes.
>everything else is a stupid fucking meme
Kill yourself.
>>63813348
because not everyones opinion is influence by social media memes and artificial hype marketing
>>63812890
Everything but II > I is correct.
I absolutely agree with this.
>>63813362
TFA will be considered better than RotJ in due time.
>>63812921
Everyone try this at home, watch the prequels without those amazing lightsaber duels. The plot is stupid as fuck, romance scenes are dull, character development is atrocious and then you will come to realize that those are only entertaining movies for kids. TFA looks actually like a real universe (you know, like the OT), not a cheap CGI fest.
>>63812890
>Attack of the shit better than The phantom shit
hahahahaha
>>63813519
It already is.
>>63813395
>a touching scene with good music makes us forget about the horrible writting of 3 movies
that's the ultimate autistic level senpai, you just went too fucking far this time. those autism levels are not even safe for you.
>>63812921
Its worse than 1 and 2 as well. The movie is a 0/5. Awful editing/action scenes, zero gravitas. no attempts at emotional resonance ring true, because they feel like they popped off an assembly line in a nerd's basement. kylo ren is a cartoon, and has zero of the imposing nature of his idol. like a failed pilot episode of a star wars spinoff, this is a joke.
>>63813523
The prequels have fine world building and universe qualities, especially Episode I.
I love that scene where the Sandpeople are shooting at the racers during the podracers. That was a nice little touch very reminiscent of the Original Trilogy.
>>63812952
I like you
What can I say? I am lovin' this prequels & TFA above VI meme!
I give it 5 out of 5 meme points!
ESB > ANH > ROJ > TFA > TPM > ROTS > AOTC
That's definitive
>>63812890
VI=IV>VII>V>I>VII>II
>>63813752
For people that get their opinions from facebook lmao
Go back to /b/ already
V>IV>VI>III>VII>I>II
Episode VII might be the most overrated star wars film. It's not bad but there was nothing memorable or original about it. It just felt like a copy pasta of A New Hope. The biggest disappointment was the score.
5>3>4>6>1=2=7
>>63812890
Star Wars > The Empire Strikes Back > Revenge of the Sith > Return of the Jedi > The Phantom Menace > The Force Awakens > Attack of the Clones
>>63813403
Do you even know what you're trying to say
4 >> 5>> 3 > 6 > 1 >>>>>super 8>>>>>> 7
2 not added because all i remember is that scene where they're fighting in that one place and the metal guy that isn't bobby gets his head chopped off
>>63813878
>>63813834
>>63813896
kill yourselves
V > IV > VII > VI >>>> I >>> III >>>>>>>> II
Not a single good thing was said here about the prequels for years.
Wanna know what changed? Everyone else started to talk shit about them when talking about the new one.
>>63812890
http://strawpoll.me/6305854
Pretend it has been more than a day since you watched the new one and that all options would be fresh.
>>63812975
It really is
Without Jar Jar, it's at least a 5/10. Still not great but it had some scenes that were actually pretty good. The pod racing scene is still awesome
Pretty shitty movie but jesus christ at least it doesn't have the rolling around in fields of flowers, complaining about sand, and the FROM MY POINT OF VIEW etc shit it in it
>>63813007
Fuck off, Bond. Go fix the last act of spectre
>>63814030
>People legitimately think 1 is better than 7
I don't think it's better than the OT, but you're a fucking retard if you thought the prequels were any good.
>>63813076
>dark luke
>that saber fight
>that ending
>that cheery feeling at the end like your life was complete with that gay ass music.
Reminder that because 3 was not complete shit like the two before it does not mean it was good.
>>63814030
>super 8
>>63814334
at least treat the prequel garbage fairly at least
I > III > II
PM actually had some cool parts while II is just an abyss of film making
>>63814284
the prequels are much better than star wars marvel edition. they are a work of vulgar auteurism art
>>63814350for she
>>63814284
The prequels had a sense of discovery. Everything was new. It took risks.
TFA does absolutely nothing to stand out on it's own. Stormtroopers, desert planet, empire and rebels.They literally did the whole death Star thing a third time. I couldn't believe it.
>>63812890
This guy gets it.
1 and 2 are interchangeable though. One has Jar Jar and kid Anakin, the other has bullshit romance.
V> IV > VII > VI > I > III > II
Search your feelings. You know it to be true.
V > IV > III > VII > VI > I > II
look, the star wars films arent meant to be great. they're just meant to be dumb adventure films
JJ abrams just didnt get that. He took the characters too seriously, he fucked up the cinematography, overused close ups, and tried to scrape the cheese off
the prequels are shit, but you can still enjoy them with a group of friends. they're memorable, not for the right reasons, but they are memorable.
VII just isnt fucking memorable. lucas is retarded but thats what makes star wars interesting even when terrible
V>IV>VI>VII>III>I>II
I was at the marathon. 6 has a lot more going for it than TFA. The original trilogy has a lot of charm and a great story that the prequels and TFA don't really capture.
>>63814565
>"So it's another Death Star?"
>"No! This one is much bigger!"
I couldn't believe my ears when I heard this in the movie. It is so flagrantly awful. Unforgivable. Then they just blow it up in the end so it doesn't even matter.
>>63814536
any other answer is for shit taste retards
>>63814565
>they're just meant to be dumb adventure films
Yeah, and that's why TFA was so great. George fucked it up with the political garbage and lifeless characters.
>He took the characters too seriously
Elaborate. I have no Idea how you can feel that way.
>he fucked up the cinematography
It was fucking beautiful.
>tried to scrape the cheese off
What do you mean?
>>63814536
>>63814803
The name's Fag, SameFag
>>63814803
Whats your top 10 films of all time?
Can someone explain to me why people are ranking 6 this low?
>>63814866
>greater than or equal to
Wtf are you doing?
>>63814844
Irrelevant
I don't have a top 10 list thought out and I'm not making one for you just so you can find something to nitpick about it and act like my opinion is wrong because I like a movie you don't
Stop being a faggot and stop having wrong Star Wars opinions
>>63814923
Nice edge
>>63814907
The same reason they're ranking that hogwash 5 so high
They don't have their own taste and are parroting
>>63814907
Dull movie. Everything on Endor was lame. The plan to rescue Han from Jabba makes no sense and has no connection to the second half of the movie.
>>63814923
Its very relevant when you step up with
>is for shit taste retards
You can admit you're a tasteless imdb drone. There are too many people posting on the board right now so you can easily slither back into the crowd
>>63814907
The truth is that George was secretly trying to make the OT shit from the beginning before his crew slapped his hand, tore his script apart, edited the shit out of the entire movie, and made them good. He finally got fed up with the movies being good by the third one and when they had all the Luke and Vader scenes written out he stepped in and said "Okay time to add the teddy bears I was talking about or you're all fired"
>Interviewed in 2012 after the announcement of the new trilogy, Lucas biographer Dale Pollock said that he had, in the 1980s, read the outlines to 12 Star Wars episodes planned by Lucas, but had been required to sign a confidentiality agreement.[39] Pollock said:
"The three most exciting stories were 7, 8 and 9. They had propulsive action, really interesting new worlds, new characters. I remember thinking, 'I want to see these 3 movies.'"
Could Lucas' sequel trilogy have been better than TFA?
>>63812890
7 > 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1 > 4½
>>63814955
>I got told after I tried to pull some bullshit faggot argument that I can't possibly lose so I'll just post a meme that'll get him
>>63815010
This pretty much.
The throne room scenes are fucking incredible though.
>>63812890
yes also
>>63812890
more like this:
IV>VI>V>bad movies>garbage>shit>III>I>VII>II
>>63815037
maybe when he was actually passionate about movie making and actually had people to help him figure out which of his decisions were shit, but most certainly not now
>>63815160
>he was actually passionate about movie making and actually had people to help him figure out which of his decisions were shit
What happened to him? Why did he stop caring? The OT was amazing, and it seems like the same care wasn't put into the prequels.
>>63814842
Not samefag, just didn't read the thread.
>>63815010
>has no connection to the second half of the movie
besides having one of the main characters back in the picture for the rest of the plot?
>>63815144
Very good taste actually. Congrats lad you aren't a tasteless neo/tv/ drone
join us in #film
V > IV > VI > III = VII > I > II
We'll never agree on anything other than the fact that Episode 2 was atrocious.
>>63815191
because he actually wasn't
he sat on his fat ass in front of a green screen and made them say terribly written lines in shot/reverse shot to each other with zero actual motivation
he'd walk up to someone who was standing in front of the green screen, be like
>okay say this while looking in this direction but look grumpy
and walk his fat lazy ass back to his chair, say action, they'd do their first attempt, he'd say
>okay that's good, next scene
and then continue for a few days in this fashion until he got to one of the parts where they have a big terrible overly coreographed lightsaber fight
>>63812934
Correct.
>>63814565
>he fucked up the cinematography
nigga, this is the first time in a starwars movie that you could just stare at the screen (with no dialogue or music) and say "woah". The scene with Solo and Kylo talking was beautiful.
>>63815389
He wasn't what? I was asking what happened to make him stop caring and why the same care of the OT wasn't put into the perquels.
>>63815316
at least don't act like anything from the prequel trilogy was anywhere close to VII and people should at least not act like anything from the OT except for VI was worse than VII
any opinion like that is objectively wrong
>>63815435
because he's fat and lazy and was really only in it for the money he'd make off merchandising that he wouldn't actually have to take any part in once he shit out some more movies
>>63815417
Show us some other examples of excellent cinematography in your opinion dear child of /v/
>>63812975
So true. Great score, as they all did. Great duel too. Young Obi-Wan.
>>63812975
>>63815550
>implying this Jar Jar wouldn't make Jar Jar more bareable.
V > IV >> VI >>> I >> III >>>> VII>>>>> II
>>63815528
I never said that it was excellent, or did I? you have way too much night terrors my fellow autistic kid.
>>63815437
People rate III as almost as good (or better) than VII because McDiarmid is a lot of fun. You might not agree that this somehow elevates the movie to that position, but I'd rather watch a crappy film that has some fairly amusing elements than an alright movie that doesn't have any moments that are all that remarkable. Don't start with that "objectively" nonsense.
>>63815202
It felt like two short movies put together. They rescued Han then moved on to something completely different.
>>63815528
jesus christ would you faggots stop trying to pull the
>tell me what else you like so I can disagree and call you wrong
shit
lol I'll nitpick one thing I don't agree with from some dumb list I tell you to make so I can blanket it all with "you have shit taste because of that"
>>63812963
This
>>63814828
>Yeah, and that's why TFA was so great. George fucked it up with the political garbage and lifeless characters.
Not gonna defend the political garbage, but if you thought that Luke Skywalker and Han Solo werent utterly fucking lifeless characters you are retarded. The lifeless archetypes were what made star wars great "mythological" adventure films
>It was fucking beautiful.
Lucas very rarely went past the nipple, hardly ever did closeups. He used a lot of wide, establishing shots to allow the audience bearing in the world. Action scenes were open and clearly choreographed, none of this call of duty camera shaking shit.
Star Wars had a very distinct style of cinematography, and honestly it was a gigantic part of what made them good adventure films. Same with Indiana Jones, and films like Conan the Barbarian.
JJ shot this like he shoots the rest of his action movies. He wants to make you feel like you're there in the action, which doesnt work for Star Wars, a mythic opera set over an entire galaxy. You're meant to see the whole of the adventure, not be a point of view in it, otherwise it feels cramped.
Please try to pretend that VII didn't feel cramped as all living fuck compared to the originals/prequels. Please try to justify those fucking terrible transitions when the rest of cinematographic style of the franchise was completely scraped.
As for beautiful, see more fucking movies, christ.
>What do you mean?
Star Wars is meant to be corny and shit. The characters are meant to be lifeless, it's supposed to just be a dumb adventure in a cool world. It thrives on how cheesy it is.
Episode VII wasn't cheesy enough, but still managed to be retarded.
>>63815026
Have you decided yet you tasteless fuck or have you run back into the sea of cross posters
>>63814907
Its an honest mistake to forget how terrible it is
>>63815417
I'd be kidding myself if there werent times where I was impressed, and the scene with Solo and Kylo was definitely one of them. I actually very much enjoyed that, but do you know why?
Because it didn't betray the cinematographic style of lucas' star wars.
I actually think you've brought up a great example of why VII is a shit star wars film. Why weren't their more shots like that? Why did the whole thing feel so cramped?
>>63815999
Instead of wasting time writing this wall of text you could've just summed it all up with "It's supposed to be shit"
>>63813045
>TFA the best
I know this is bait but you're not wrong
1) 5
2) 4
3) 7
4) 6
5) 3
6) 1
7) 2
>>63813834
Yup, you got it.
Though, I haven't watched most of the films in a while. I'm confident that I > II and that both are at the bottom, though I do plan on rewatching them. I rewatched IV (despecialized) recently and it wasn't fantastic like I remembered it, but still really great. I think V is better, but I need to watch it again. I used to believe III > VI, but that was just me being contrarian. III is a good film and VI is flawed, but VI is still better than III any day of the week.
VII is a mediocre disappointment.
>>63813626
Bait harder m8
V=IV>VI>III>I>II
VII is fanfiction tier
It's V > IV > VI > VII > I > III > II
>>63816311
Stop this 7 over OT meme. Lunacy. After TFA I left the theatre feeling like I do after movies like Pacific Rim. N O T M E M O R A B L E
>>63816430
ROTJ was a fucking piece of shit
>>63816430
>Stop liking things I don't like
Calm down, autismo.
>>63812890
V>IV>VI>VII>III>I>II
This is the correct ranking you faggots
5>4>6>3=7>1>2
>>63816525
>3=7
I love Mcdiarmid too, but come on now.
>>63816473
>stop disliking things I like
get a better line and your own thoughts.
>>63816672
Nice strawman.
>>63816670
It really is on par.
ROTS is fun and dark and full of conflict despite shitty dialogue at times and some other flaws. TFA is a safely made good revamp of ANH injected with some new elements, but the characters somewhat lack depth, as well as the plot.
>>63814536
I still put VI>VII because the scenes between Luke/Vader/Emperor were so fucking good.
>>63816704
i'm working with what you're giving me, outsider
V>VII>VI
fuck a new hope.
better yet fill out this poll
http://strawpoll.me/6306008/
I'd argue that the "correct" order is V > IV > VI > VII > III > II > I
That being said, my own order would be IV > V > VI > VII > III > I > II
>>63815191
Its why the movies are shit. With the OT you have the set and the actors there, its easier to gauge how it will look post production. With the prequels you have to wait a few months after all the rendering to see how shit it was. He probably didnt even have the CG or other characters lines read.
That and Lucas was given too much power, sad to say, but someone should have reigned him in. Like taken his scripts reworked them a bit but make sure they worked for Lucas, and given them to a competent director.
>>63812890
V>VI>IV=VII>III>II>I
VI>V>VI=>VII>III>II=I
Am I the only one here who likes ROTJ the most?
>>63817270
No I agree also on feels, but regardless of feelings V is objectively a better film so that is what you say in a ranking anon. You've got acknowledge idiosyncratic lapses in rationality.
>>63812890
V>IV>VI=III>>>I>II>>>>VII
Episode VI and III had Sheev, all VII had was an edgelord vader fanboy.
>>63817270
Ewoks.
IV > V > VI > II > VII > III > I
>>63817626
>II
Kek at that bait.
>>63817543
>all VII had was an edgelord vader fanboy.
That's what made him great.
I love them, but Sheev and Vader were always on top of their game. It's nice to see an incompetent villain for once.
>>63817942
You fucked up.
V > IV > VI = VII > III > I > Christmas Special > II
>>63812890
V>III=VII=IV>VI>II>>>>>IA lot of III is crap, but the sound and visual design is god tier.VII was a solid 7/10.I never really liked IV that much, it has a lot of inconsistency in universe
>>63813896
switchthe last 2 and uve got my rating family
V > IV > VI > III > I > II > VII
Hope > Empire > Awakens > Jedi > Spaceballs > > > Star Tours > > > > Phantom > Sith > Clones
/sp/ here let me show you how its done
1. a new hope
2. empire strikes back
gap
3. revenge of the sith
4. return of the jedi
POWER GAP
5. Phantom Menace
.
.
.
91. Attack of the clones
.
.
POWERFUL GAP
.
.
.
POWER GAP
.
.
.
.
900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001. The force awakens
I liked 1,2,3 more than 4,5,6
>>63818368
That's cool. Enjoyment is subjective anyway.
I mean, some people get off by sticking rods into their dickholes, so being into a bit of cinematic torture seems fair enough.
>>63818410
QT padme
>>63812890
V > IV > VI > III > VII > II > I
Why the fuck does everyone hate return of the Jedi in respect to the others? It's very well put together
>>63812890
IV > V > Clone Wars > III > Spaceballs > VI > I > II > Rebels >> VII
Empire > A New Hope = Force Awakens >Return of the Jedi > Revenge of the Sith > Attack of the Clones =Phantom Menace
>>63818435
>III above VII
What's it like living a life that is inherently wrong?
>>63818487
This thread is full of people trolling an attacking like TFA isn't clearly better than every prequel by a mile.
>>63818002
agreed
>>63818438
>Ewoks
>NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
>Hayden Christensen
>Special Edition awful alien song in Jabba's palace
>lol surprise twist Leia is Luke's sister
Granted most of them are not in the original release though....
>>63813014
bingo
>>63818505
its hard to tell what each of them are butthurt over.
The female protagonist
The black protagonist
That its too similar
That its too different
like, this ain't a perfect movieRey really could use some more depth as a character beyond ms perfect badass but that's what the second movie is forbut it did a good job of oscillating between drama, action, and humor. And the lightsaber fights alone put it above the prequels, by not shitass coreagraphy and not overexposing them, and when they do come out shit feels right, fuckers light up the person with their color and it always means something when someone is using one.
>>63812890
6 and 7 are equal quality films. 4 and 5 are better than both. 1, 2, and 3 are entirely bad and not worth comparing.
>>63818553
>ewoks are bad
???
>>63818724
They are.
They do nothing but slow the movie down and turn the empire into an even bigger joke.
5>4>7=6>3>1>2
>>63812921
This anon gets it.
TFA is at the bottom together with ep I and ep II
>>63812890
V>III>VI>I>IV>VII>II
Come at me
1.Jedi
2.Hope
3.Empire
4.Force
5.Sith
6.Clone
7.Menace
5>4>6>3>2>1>7
only reddit will disagree
TFA was the worst of all. Phantom menace was just a fun movie. Turn your brain off and watch it. ITs just fun. Clones was the worst.
Correct answer, 4>5>1>6>3>7>2 . 7 was shit. Just not complete shit like 2.
V>VII>IV>III>VII>I>II
>>63818902
Seriously, it was like I was watching a Star Trek film modded to look like Star Wars.
>>63818979
it's a fucking copy of a new hope. by that alone it can't be rated higher than anything. complete trash.
>>63812963
> VII > IV
How is the remake better than the original?
TFA was capeshit and derivative as hell, but fuck if I didn't have fun and walk out with a smile.
V>IV=VII>III>VI>I>II
>>63819073
By that alone it should be rated equal to A New Hope.
>>63819073
How is it a copy of A New Hope when blowing up Starkiller Base had way more in common with Death Star II than Death Star I
???
>>63818932
>TFA was the worst of all. Phantom menace was just a fun movie. Turn your brain off and watch it. ITs just fun.
This is the worst opinion I've ever seen.
>>63818979
>>63818979
>It was directed by JJ Abrams, who did the Star Trek remakes, so despite being completely faithful to the thematic influences and stylings of Star Wars OT I'm going to compare it to Star Trek, a series with which it shares almost no significant influences
Your opinions are dogshit.
IV > V > VII = III > VI > I > II
And I'm not reading the thread family.
>>63819447
Lol, what thematic influences and stylings? The cinematography was too zoomed in for comfort, killing the scale of the saga, and the pacing was rushed to the point I just felt like he added elements from the three OT films without pausing to take any of it in. There were scenes that should have been more startling and emotive but fell flat due to the progression. JJ used Trek as a reference point for this film, not Wars.
>>63818066
>III = IV
Fucking kill yourself.
>>63819762
>JJ used Trek as a reference point for this film, not Wars.
Pants on head retarded, it follows the narrative of A New Hope beat for beat.
>The cinematography was too zoomed in for comfort, killing the scale of the saga
Pants on head retarded yet again. Off the top of my head, the opening scenes in Jakku all have wide shots to show off the AT AT and Star Destroyer wrecks. The opening shot of the incoming X-wings is done in a wide shot, and there are shitloads of far shots in any given fight.
Saying that Abrams used Star Trek as a template for possibly the most Star Wars movie ever made puts you in the running for the stupidest fucking opinions I've ever seen posted on this website.
>>63819954
Of course he played it safe with the goddamn plot, but the action, pacing, scaling, and such were all JJ. What few wide shots there were were a breath of air compared to the majority of the scenes. Only two instances regarding fights were there really far shots that I could recall, and both happened at that one temple. They were both also the only decent fights the entire film.
>>63812934
That was actually mine
>Episode III
>Goods
This is literally a meme now isn't it?
>>63820120
Please stop, you're just looking dumber the more you post.
TFA mimics pretty much everything about A New Hope with the exception of the characters. The action is absolutely taken from A New Hope, the pace is quicker than a New Hope, but not by much.
Either you haven't watched Star Wars, you haven't watched Star Trek, or you're literally retarded.
Your opinions are just stupid anon.
>>63820238
Ah, I get it now.
Good show!
>>63815999
Archetypes? Yes.
Lifeless? How the fuck could you think this? Luke in ANH I see, but it's just stupid to label Han as lifeless
Only seen VII once so far...
VI = V > VII = IV > III > I > II
>>63813014
>VII
>being this retarded
>>63820535
What?
