Will we ever get a fantasy film series as good as this again?
nope
If they adapt more fantasy series on par with LoTR, sure.
>>63767059
Be thankful that we got it as good as it is. The extended versions are the closest you could ever get to visualizing the books - each movie is a masterpiece... even despite orlando bloom.
Just give it a few years.
>series
no
but excalibur was pretty good
>>63767148
would kill for another age series
I would also want some new shit get rid of the LOTR EU and give me Frodo Returns movie
>>63767148
I don't think the silmarillion would work well as a movie 2bh
just wait until they finally get Elric of Melnibone on the screen. "you call yourself an anti-hero? how many of your friends AND WIVES has your demon-possessed hellblade killed THIS WEEK?"
>>63767211
>I would also want some new shit get rid of the LOTR EU
What?
>>63767217
>I don't think the silmarillion would work well as a movie 2bh
Then you are both wrong and an idiot. Film is explicitly a visual medium, Tolkiens is a very visual world.
It would do very well on film.
>>63767217
never got this kind of mentality. give a reason why, other than parroting what you hear everywhere
>>63767059
Give me a fantasy series that doesn't have eagles ex machina
>>63767217
I think it has the potential to be a great movie, it just might not appeal to as many people.
On a slightly different note: could there every be an equivalent to the LOTR trilogy in film for the science fiction genre?
>>63767059
>calls it a film
>when it literally has "motion picture" in the title
>>63767575
Star Wars
>>63767575
I like to think the SW prequel trilogy could've been something special if the dialogue, acting and overuse of greenscreen/CGI was cleaned up.
