>we thought it would be shit
>has a 100% on RT
why are we ALWAYS WRONG?
>>63698907
It wasn't a matter of being shit, it was all "HURR DURR BLACK MAN WHITE WOMAN KEK CONFIRMED"
>>63698907
Because you hang out on 4chan where the dregs of intelligence go to die?
>RedditTomatoes
No thanks friend
>>63698907
>we
>normie the frog
Fuck off, reddit.
>>63698907
If media this year has taught us anything is that it takes a couple of weeks for a real opinion to form after the hype wears off.
I don't think it'll be bad but if you think Disney's gonna let this launch in any way that isn't perfect then you're delusional
>>63698907
>frogposting
just end it
>>63698907
That's not what it means.
A fresh tomatoes is a score anywhere from 70-100% (I might be wrong)
So when it says like 20 fresh, it means no one has yet to rate it less than whatever the threshold for fresh is
It doesn't actually mean people think it's 100%
/tv/ got
BTFO
T
F
O
>>63699027
>not knowing how RT works
A rotten rating is anything below a 7/10, 3/5, B-, etc.
dumb frog poster!
Well well well /pol/kolds
How'd you like us now
:^)
>>63698907
We literally said this would happen.
Nobody is going to be the first one to say, "Well, it's actually not that great."
You also have to remember that the Tomato Meter is a binary, GOOD/BAD, system.
The fact that it has a rating of 8.6/10 is closer to what it deserves.
>>63698907
I thought it would be shilled by kikes
Why is /pol/ always right?
>>63699046
Lol, no. The critic decides it. I've seen a ton of 3/5 marked as rotten.
>>63699157
show me
Take you contrarian opinion elsewhere. Now you can't hate it
>/polgbt/ is always right
>fa/tv/irgins are always right
Nope, you're always wrong about everything.
>avatars gonna flop
>guardians will flop
>ex machina will suck
>mad max will suck
>age of ultron will be the highest grossing movie
>>63699173
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/spectre_2015/reviews/?sort=rotten
>>63699202
/tv/ is literally never right.
>>63699225
>ctrl+f "3/5"
>0 results
>spaceshit
>>63699271
Oh, you're just retarded.
>>63699305
Oh, you were BTFO.
>>63698907
>/pol/ and /tv/ is always right
DELETE THIS!
>>63699305
There's plenty of C/D ratings there.
>>63699251
currently the board has something like 70% Star Wars threads, and that isn't an exaggeration
/tv/ isn't wrong, it is literally obsessed with the film.
of course this will change in 2 weeks when the epic cycle of contrarian-ism beings, it's really the same shit you saw with :
Inception
Drive
etc
>>63698907
THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A FLOP
WHY IS IT STILL 100% ON RT?
SOMEONE GIVE IT A BAD REVIEW PLEASE!
PLEASE? ;_;
It's Star Wars you fucking mong, it's shit no matter what. You're going to let a number tell you a soulless consumer action picture is any good? For shame, that's just ridiculous.
>>63699426
It's literally shills who start the Star Wars threads you cockmongler. And all the redditors flock to it.
It's not contrarian to hate reddit: the movie
Also who the fuck hates Inception or Drive?
>>63699528
I hate Inception and I just barely appreciate Drive.
b-b-but normies never learn, r-right guys?
>>63699528
>Also who the fuck hates Inception or Drive
For someone who posts 10 buzzwords to fit in, you really should avoid writing things that says you've been here less than a year.
>>63699528
Hello Reddit!
>>63698907
WAIT, WE CAN BLAME THIS ON REDDIT! YEAH, REDDIT TAUGHT IT WOULD BE SHIT, /tv/ WITH ALL ITS THREAD SAID IT WOULD BE GREAT
FUCKING REDDITORS HA-HAPLEASE GIVE IT A BAD REVIEW PLEASE?
>>63699426
>why is a television and film board currently talking about Force Awakens so much?
though yeah, I can see your point. I remember when Avengers first came out and anyone who criticized it got shat on relentlessly on /tv/.
>>63698907
>100%
How you want your movie industry, f a m?
>>63698907
>we
>>63699674
lol i love dumb frog posters like you that just want all new movies and games to fail. You must have an enjoyable life.
a glib fascimile
