https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRVD32rnzOw
Discuss.
looks better than the last one.... maybe...
Watched it three times now its getting better with every rewatch
Jew jew Abrams is gone so its only up from here
I can't muster any outrage because I never liked any of the Star Trek movies. Not a single one. No, not even that one.
>>63660117
Kind of like what I see. It's like the entire movie is an away mission. After the last 2 movies were almost entirely on a spaceship excluding 2 minutes to pick up old spock and scotty on an ice planet, this is kind of refreshing.
>>63660210
Yeah at first I was pretty pissed caused it looked like a lame story but then I realized this will work better
Grounding it Ina sense
Dumbest schlock I've seen in a long time. Sure, pretty much all the Trek films in the past couple decades were basically just action films with a thin veneer of Trek polish, but they've never been so egregious about it, now it's just sad how desperately they want the capeshit/Guardians of the Galaxy market. They aren't even trying to pretend there's any semblance to the cerebral, philosophically exploratory aspects of the original series anymore.
The worst part is I have nothing against a plain old "space beat 'em up", but wedging in those pasty unlikable NuTrek actors as the high-intensity action heroes just breeds together the worst of both worlds. If you wanna do kung fu alien-punching run and gun hijinks, cast yourself a Vin Diesel or a Duane Johnson and do it right. Don't slap a Star Trek label on it and make us watch some smarmy twitter-generation millennials do kickflips around a jungle set.
>>63660117
Address the fucking low quality bullshit anons
1. Sabotage
REUSING A FUCKING TRACK FROM THE FIRST FILM
2. Kirk hitting teleporter pad hard right before impact on other local
They did this in the 1st movie with sulu
3. The ship getting town apart
They already did this in into darkness
For real they are just rehashing shit
Be real the trailer was average
>>63660358
Rehashing shit in Star Trek? You don't say.
>>63660355
They're Gen-Xers, only Chris Pine barely hits the upper limit of a millennial.
>>63660355
Guardians at least had good music throughout
>>63660117
I hated the first two Jar Jar Trek movies, this looks like more of the same brainless action schlock.
>>63660117
I'll suck Karl Urbans dick... NOT IN A GAY WAY, just in a his dick rubbing against my tonsils kinda way.
Seriously, that last thing with the teleporter was the only thing I really liked.
>>63660477
Its Justin Lin though
Were in good hands. True detective season 2 was better than 1, the new FF movie was almost as good as Tokyo drift
Well be alright
>tfw watching with horror as spock beams out knowing, just KNOWING, that urban is going to make an obvious fucking godawful stupid joke
>>63660117
>Jar Jar Trek
Fuck Abrams in his jew ass for turning Star Trek into some gay action series.
>>63660117
I've only ever seen The Wrath of khan and jj's 1st Star Trek, and I gotta saw the trailer looked.. Try hard. I can't saw what it was trying hard to be, it it was trying to be like some action movie. Barely any notice of spaceiness or anything other than quipy quiotes
I hate the damn music, like wtf yo?
The trailer looked cool, but I didn't like their choice of song. Not that its the Beastie Boys, just that I don't feel it matches the tone of the series.
>>63660647
"We"?
You are clearly not a genuine Star Trek fan.
>The next Star Trek film will be closer in spirit to the original television show, according to co-writer Simon Pegg.
>“I think we just want to take it forward with the spirit of the TV show,” revealed Pegg. “And it’s a story about frontierism and adventure and optimism and fun, and that’s where we want to take it, you know. Where no man has gone before – where no one has gone before, sensibly corrected for a slighter more enlightened generation. But yeah, that’s the mood at the moment.”
You know what guys I'm excited about this movie desu
>>63660792
Clearly he was being sarcastic, no one uses F&F as a positive unironically
Already seems to action-y, but maybe that is just because the trailer is supposed to be for normies. The premise seems better since it actually has them on planets and doing shit. Might just be one long away mission which would be a lot better than the last 2.
Why the fuck are they using this song again though? It was out of place the first time, and it is out of place now.
>>63660117
The most positive thing I can say about that trailer is that it looks like they're doing something new, stupid as hell probably, but new. Into Darkness was so goddamn boring because it was painfully predictable and the second you realized that they were just remaking wrath of khan it all falls apart. The most shocking thing about ST:2009 is that it wasn't a flaming turd of a movie. This one? I just hope that its fun, I've given up on Star Trek movies being any good since The Undiscovered Country.
>>63660715
>I've only ever seen The Wrath of khan and jj's 1st Star Trek
>>63660955
Lol where do I start with star trek though
Never liked star wars but trek always seemed interesting
>>63661105
Watch a Top Ten or Top Twenty episode list of TOS. If you like what you see, go back to the beginning and watch the whole show.
Watch the pilot of TNG, then try watching from the beginning of the third season. If you like what you see, go back to the beginning and watch the whole show.
Save DS9 as a reward for when you finish TOS and TNG.
>>63661105
Start with the best series TOS. Watch the second pilot which was the first to have Kirk in it. The episode is called Where No Man Has Gone Before.
>>63661105
To be quite honest family, not the movies. You also don't NEED to watch them in order, especially the different series, but mostly even the episodes within a series. TOS, TNG, and DS9 are all good in different ways. Voyager should be avoided unless you've suckled hard on the Star Trek-teet and you're desperate for more. Enterprise should be ignored entirely.
these look fucking horrible
>>63661105
the age of TOS put me off so I watched TNG first, don't be dumb like me, TOS is amazing and the age barely matters, I'm just finishing s3 now.
Spock is so cool.
>>63661176
>>63660795
>"It's not Khan." - Simon Pegg
He's a known liar. He can't be trusted.
I bet you trust Jamake Highwater too. You're so trusting that you should be a legate.
>>63661273
Is it just me, or is this image the victim ofSABOTAGE?
Are they going to blow up the Enterprise AGAIN?
ALREADY?
>>63661273
Sir I believe your picture may be doctored in order to spread lies and misinformation among the general populace.
>>63661319
heres the OC i ruined with my own amending
So after seeing that this is the shit that they're going to be shoveling out for a movie... how sure are you now that the 2017 TV show is going to be more horrible schlock?
6 fucking years of defending the reboot series for this.
feeling triggered, very triggered
>>63661276
S. Pegg is the ultimate Star Trek fan and would do anything to protect Star Trek. Now you're turning this into a criticism?
>>63661446
>deceiving fans into thinking they're not just getting a shitty movie rehash/remake is "protecting star trek"
>>63661446
Pegg is begg. He's just a beggar in it for the money.
>>63661461
Bro they're taking star trek back to its roots
You're just mad Abrams isn't directing be honest senpai
>>63661446
I've never understood why people think that Simon Pegg writing this is any sort of saving grace. Like he's an 'okay' comedy writer, but he's never written anything that'd be dramatic or clever enough to be a decent TNG or DS9 episode.
Not to mention his awkward disdain for geek culture that seems to crop up from time to time.
>>63661446
He is literally "need studio puppet" the guy.
He literally said "I like star trek more than Star Wars because in working on Star Trek now"
>>63660117
I can't even click on the link anymore because I know what happens when I press play.
![shatnerhasbeen[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/R6VpDXE.jpg "shatnerhasbeen[1].jpg")
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-eJQ1mTVzA
I can't get behind this new movie.
GIMME A BREAK!
>>63660355
Don't act surprised, as soon as you read the movie was titled Star Trek Beyond, that alone should have triggered hmmms
As a big fan of Janeway this is right up my alley....lets do this shit, lets just fucking jump the enterprise over the prime directive giving the middle finger with one hand with some hot alien bitch in the other.
>>63661384
>he doesn't realize that a captain's primary role is a diplomatic leader and not a savage
>>63661587
He came from Vulcan, he had a thirst for knowledge. He studied science at the academy. That's where I... caught his eye.
>>63660795
>sensibly corrected for a slighter more enlightened generation
IT'S
>>63660795
>sensibly corrected for a slighter more enlightened generation
Wow is that ever a massively tumblr phrase.
"Commander, tell me about your sexual organs."
>>63660647
>True detective season 2 was better than 1
>>63661133
>Man says he is new to Trek and wants an intro
>Start with TOS he says
So you must realize that it takes a very special sort of Millennial to watch an entire episode of TOS, most couldn't handle that shit and that isn't their fault at all.
>>63661638
Are they really going to jump a motorcycle over the Enterprise? Did they forget how big it is?
>>63661739
>>63661776
Those glorious fanboy tears when it bombs.
>>63660647
At least it'll force the fan faction who defends the Abrams reboot to acknowledge this entire project was a dumb idea.
>>63661337
that was the last fucking straw for me
I won't even torrent it
>>63661817
>implying true fans won't be celebrating its demise
>>63661806
It's really that big?
That's retarded.
>>63661956
nah its a joke
they scaled the enterprise up for ST09, from like 400m to a km, although interior shots like the shuttlebay and engineering indicate it must be even larger
then in into darkness they scaled it up again for no reason
>>63661652
"Thats what happens when one is only 14 and wants to see pew pew boom instead of actual science fiction."
-Mark Twain
>>63660117
What the fuck are those outfits? Where the hell is the large naval style ship battles?
>zooming in on women/uhura as she opens her mouth really wide to scream
Why the fuck do all trailers do this now?
Jurassic World, the scene didn't even make sense in the movie
It's something they film just for the trailer and shove it into the plot later
>>63661894
True fans basically gave up after stuff like Enterprise and the reboot. Personally the people that stuck with the show from TNG-Ent left or died The present fandom are a bunch of rabid dykes who will comment brigade for the mere suggestion that the reboot is shit.
>>63661784
what is this?
>>63662051
>The present fandom are a bunch of rabid dykes who will comment brigade for the mere suggestion that the reboot is shit.
Are these the same people who took over the Hugo awards?
>>63661806
>>63661956
No, the problem is it was designed by some 20-something hack with no vehicle or machine design experience. People have noted that the scale is all off, and doesn't make sense no matter what size you make it.
It's not even Trekkie nerd stuff, it's basic modelling competency that an effects artist should know. It really makes me wonder what the fuck is wrong with the training pipeline for these people.
>>63662101
>It really makes me wonder what the fuck is wrong with the training pipeline for these people.
It's called nepotism.
>>63662136
I think you misspelled 'judaism.'
>"Is that music?"
>"That's a good choice."
>"Aye, well-played."
That exchange didn't make any sense.
![enterprise-huge-saucer[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/oaNHzhP.jpg "enterprise-huge-saucer[1].jpg")
>>63662101
my favorite shot
>>63662216
Probably comes from three different parts of the movie.
And with a different song.
>>63661956
it has to be that big to fit the 18 miles of water pipes that exist solely for simen pegg to be trapped in.
>>63662284
I liked that part because it was like heh he's in a pipe!
>>63662321
>mfw Anon is posting ironically but I don't know who they're trying to make fun of
>>63660117
Is there some big list of Hollywood cliches that every movie has to check off or something?
>>63662459
>Let's do that "Let's never do that again" again.
Star Trek is meant to be a comfy tv series not a series of blockbuster films. Paramount fucked up the franchise so badly. Even Enterprise is preferable to this shit.
>>63662052
The future feminist want.... No gender but most of the people look and behave like bitches.
>>63662223
That's a big saucer.
>>63662574
4lights
>>63662549
>Even Enterprise is preferable to this shit.
I never thought anything could make me feel that way, but I'm actually nostalgic for T'Pol.
Any word on what is the race of the grey-like things? They kinda look like Jem'Hadar.
>>63662704
Enterprise's time is finally near.
>everybody is fucking salty for no reason
>THIS ISNT STAR TREK THIS IS TACKY AND CHEESY AND STUPID
"I watched the episodes /tv/ told me to once": The Thread
This shit looks good and you can all go back to your star wars thread
>>63662706
looks like Allan Rickman from Galaxy Quest
>>63662514
>Spock is beamed on to the Enterprise as McCoy is left to die
Spock: "Well that's a thing!"
>Kirk is found in bed with an orion girl, Spock purses his lips
Spock: "I do not believe such behavior is suitable for duty hours, captain"
>Scotty leans around the doorframe and into the scene
Scotty: "Spock, it's stardate 2259! Come on!"
>Away mission, the usual gang of Kirk, Spock, McCoy surveying an alien landscape. McCoy is bent over a prone alien form
Kirk: "Bones, is it alive?"
McCoy: "Damn it Jim, I identify as a woman, not a man! Call me by my proper nickname of Boned or else this is going straight to Starfleet command!"
>Spock raises an eyebrow at Kirk
Spock: "He's right Jim, These microaggressions only serve to reduce team cohesion and efficiency and are illogical"
>>63662777
Heh, the actor looks more like G'Kar from Babylon 5 to me.
>>63662706
based on what they did to klingons, those are probably the new andorians
>>63661739
>>63661776
I think he means a generation that knows more about things like evolution and the universe.
>>63662830
Still amazes me how good the alium faces are in B5, especially compared to Trek which has a hell of a bigger budget. I know Trek has the handwavey lore reason of "Something something, seeded universe, something, lumpy foreheads" but still. You compare the amount of expression even the most no-name narn can get out of his face compared to almost any alien in Trek.
>>63662549
No. Sumner Redstone fucked it up when he split Paramount and CBS into two corporations and left Les Moonves who hated Trek in charge of CBS.
>>63660795
>sensibly corrected for a slighter more enlightened generation
HELLO? HELLO, MC FLY.
They already changed that in TNG. Why is your image of Star Trek stuck in the 60s?
>>63662753
I fear the rumored new TV series more than these movies. It'll probably be ''Game of Thrones in Spaaaaaace"
>>63662830
That was a good show.
>>63660355
>cerebral, philosophically exploratory aspects of the original series anymore.
>>63662973
>Executive Producer Alex Kurtzman
It's fucked.
>>63662973
It can't be worse.
GoT in Space will be closer to Andromeda. Still better than the Abrams abortion.
>>63660795
Sorry, they rewrote pegg's script so it'd be action schlock.
PEOPLE DON'T WANT THAT SHIT NO MORE
PEOPLE WANT SHOOOTING
>>63662973
>''Game of Thrones in Spaaaaaace"
>Not wanting to watch Wesley crush Crusher
>>63663002
Well it sure as hell wasn't built around action. The show was always heady, and generally disliked by many people for being "boring", techno-babble, and often overly-philosophical dialogue and plots.
I didn't feel that way, but it wasn't even treated like a regular prime time show. It survived because of reruns, and its relatively cheap production costs. We're all better off for it existing too.
>>63662941
He's referring specifically to the old adventures themes in the show, which are politically incorrect by today;s standards.
>>63663020
Well, he did do Hercules and Xena. I think we'll know more of what to expect when they reveal which timeline the show takes place in.
>>63662704
C'mon guys Enterprise is a fun exploration of the Alpha quadrant.
Just because Archer dual wields doesn't mean it is all bad. You get to see the tech progress too, I liked that.
>>63663159
What the fuck are you talking about? Then again, SJW probably hate the Prime Directive because it says they're not allowed to change other societies and force their ideas on other civilizations. SJW are more like the Borg than anything.
>Why do you resist? We only wish to improve quality of life.
>Discussion is irrelevant.
Will they ever make a movie about a androids right to civil liberties?
Or how a black 50's scifi writer faced racism but it turned out it was a prophecy sent to him by wormhole aliens?
Or a starship captain being transformed into a salamander and getting raped and impregnated by one of her crew who was also transformed into a salamander?
Then I'm not interested.
>>63663280
How many episodes of Voyager can YOU watch before wanting to kill Neelix, /tv/? Let's compare.
I start wanting him to die about midway through the third episode.
>>63663328
Just GO Mr. Neelix.
>>63660117
Looks shitty. Too much humor and the music ruins it.
>>63663328
One. The one where his fucking cheese infects the ship's systems and they have heat up the ship to kill the bacteria.
Why they didn't sell him to slavers or space him after that was beyond me.
>>63660641
This. Karl is the only one who managed to nail down the character well.
Spock turned from a calm wise confidant into an arrogant bipolar jackass.
>>63663545
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=circ3_-JJy0
>>63661133
More like just watch TOS and then maybeBreaking Badand then accept TV will never be this good again, maybe Game of Thrones will top them. I can also say that trailer is total utter fucking garbage and not one slither of it comes close to what Star Trek is about hell I don't even know what the movie is about from that shit trailer.
