>/tv/ will be triggered by this
>H-eight-ful
I see no problems here.
as a lifelong film fan who sees tarantino for the non-entity he is, I always struggle to get why /tv/ is so offended by his presence
I enjoy a good tarantino movie time to time, but at the end of the day, even at his worst, his films are entirely insignificant and ignorable.
a lot of artistry and passion being put into very tight pieces of inoffensive mass entertainment. what's there to be angered by?
i look forward to seeing this someday down the road. I'm sure I'll have fun.
>>63656929
>>63656929
>yfw shills get paid for posts like this
I'm excited for Tim Roth's character and Walton Goggins. The rest are give or take.
Anyone seen this yet? if so how's Tatum?
>>63656929
Im watching The Ridiculous 6 instead!
I'm going to be watching Christmas day
>>63657005
>what's there to be angered by?
He called police officers murderers.
>>63656929
It looks entirely uninteresting, tbqh.
>>63657284
Well, some of them are to be quite honest with you senpai
>>63657275
>I'm going to be watching Christmas day
guys call uncle /pol/ we found the jew
I think it'll be his worst film yet. I'm a huge Tarantino fan, too, but I think this movie will be garbage.
>>63657438
Can't be worse than django
>>63657284
They are, you stupid liberal. That's why we have to protect our second amendment rights!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjXHOCbj0yU
i thought it was christoph waltz for a sec
>>63657462
It could be.
>>63657391
Yeah. All five of them.
>inb4 bootlicker
WARM
>>63658518
BLACK
VICTIMS OF POLICE BRUTALITY
>>63658544
DINGUS
>>63657486
Tim Roth is very expressive here, I actually find him more similar to DDL's Bill The Butcher.
triggered? more like turned on you pathetic keks
>>63657005
>Tarantino
>ignorable, inoffensive mass entertainment
you probably think you get film but you don't
>>63658772
come now, dont be so cryptic
what do you mean?
