milenials will find this obscure
Anyone got the scans from the latest playboy? Pamela is on the last nude Playboy that will be printed.
>>63650069
What a waste. It's the final nude issue. They should've broken the fucking bank and gone after a huge name, someone relevant with whom the mag could go out in style.
>>63650154
For real. Shoulda got Daisy Ridley or Jennifer Lawrence or somebody.
>>63650069
Here's a link
pornbb.org/post32693894.html?highlight=pamela%20anderson%20playboy#32693894
>>63650154
But Pamela was the most popular one, she's a playboy icon, it makes sense they would go for her.
>>63649966
MASS QUANTITIES
>>63649966
>sexual repression and serial killers
>the connection no one talks about
I-I'm just shy is all, right? Just cause I can't work up the courage to ask a girl out doesn't mean I'm a killer
>>63650069
Gross, she's old and her plastic tits have not aged well.
>>63649966
I would love to see the 2015 version of that cover
>>63650251
>Jennifer Lawrence
There's already hundreds of naked pictures of her online. Why would anyone buy a playboy to see her?
>millenials
If you're 35, and you don't know the coneheads, you should kill yourself.
>>63650291
My god, she's still got it.
Thanks by the way.
>>63650291
What the fuck happened to you Playboy? This shit is Maxim tier.
>>63650618
They went sjw. No more nudity, starting next issue.
>>63650322
She's pushing 50. This only bolsters the point that the mag is irrelevant.
Playboy used to actually land celebrities. As I'd bet the whole operation will likely be out of business within ten years, it would've been nice to have that surprise shocker of a nude pictorial one last time.
>>63650636
not sjw, pornhub killed it, who wants to spend $5 on something thats free
>the feminists did it again
why are modern men so weak
>>63650660
Did you see the newest set? She looks excellent, considering her age. And you're clearly underplaying how big of a deal she was in the 90s. She practically started the bolted-on boobs fad, everyone was obsessed with her. For Playboy, she was a big deal.
>>63649966
>Coneheads
>Obscure
U wot m8?
>>63650689
That's the official explanation. However it makes no sense, since Playboy was never about pornography, it was about erotica and the glorification and celebration of female beauty. You could always find smut, Playboy was never about that.
>>63650698
Shh let it happen, let it all go to hell. Only then can we hope for true change.
>>63650399
Christ. Just jerk off. Not satisfied? Do it again.
Sex is cerebral. Merely getting off is perfunctory. Why do faggots have to wile out and start killing bitches?
>>63650399
>the connection no one talks about
except for literally anyone who's even armchair psychoanalyzed a serial killer
>>63650724
>And you're clearly underplaying how big of a deal she was in the 90s.
I'm not. I know that she was a big deal.
Throughout its history, Playboy was able to get many a notable iconic beauty to pose nude. I just think it would've been awesome for the mag to go back to the well one last time to get an icon from this generation as its send off.
>>63649966
Her and Tommy Lee's honeymoon is still the GOAT.
>that roadhead
>that prime pam poon
>tommy driving the boat with his dick
>pam with her tits out rolling up a spliff
you guys love repeating new words you learn
can the next buzz word be amyadala?
>>63653401
*amygdala
oh well, repetition repetition repetition
>>63650689
so what are they going to print?
>>63650764
>it was about erotica and the glorification and celebration of female beauty
thats the polite way of saying "photos of naked women"
stop being a literalist retard
>>63653586
edgy articles, short stories, and uncensored interviews
>>63650636
look at this retard. theyl make much more money with the nonnude magazine
>>63650575
No, in fact she does not still have it. They completely photoshopped like 80% of her body in those images. Her tits are nearly all photoshop.
>>63653888
At this point they won't. No one buys magazines anymore, porn or not. I doubt people who have never read a Playboy before will suddenly subscribe to it now that it doesn't have nudity.
>>63650291
she has really weird nipples like she's still hot as fuck especially for being almost fifty but dang
Does this mean they'll start selling Playboys in grocery store checkout lines and Walmart type family stores? That's going to seem weird.
>>63650542
To be fair it could be a pretty good angle. She does the nude shoot and creates a big stir because she's giving us permission to look at her nude now. Another act of empowerment, i'm sure there's plenty that would eat that shit up.
>>63654781
They've been photoshopped.
>>63650842
It's about being with someone else, not just blowing a load. The knowledge that some girl let you inside of her is more important than finishing on her.
>>63653633
Not who you're talking to, but even in Playboy's heyday there were magazines like Hustler and Swank and to a lesser extent Penthouse that were notably more... conventionally pornographic than Playboy.
Like ogling a woman in a fishnet bra rolling around in the sand or taking a bubble bath in a magazine pictorial was legitimately considered much more respectable and socially proper than ogling a girl in pigtails holding on to a barstool while getting railed in the ass.
Also they all featured political commentary, and while obviously none of them were "conservative," Playboy was very nouveau riche in it's sentiments like wine tasting or investment banking advice, whereas Hustler was perpetually calling for a serious dictatorship of the proletariat.
>>63654804
>he gets groceries and playboys at separate stores
>>63653452
Queen Amygdala?
>>63655000
WEW LAD
>>63655084
Don't worry, eventually you'll become a wizard.
>>63654754
Well they say that taking nudity off the website saw their traffic increase.
>millenials will never own multiple 1970s copies of Playboy where OJ Simpson models and endorses Dingo brand Cowboy boots, the only cowboy boot worn by OJ fuckin' Simpson
>>63649966
Ah, those old days when Playboy used to have nude women.
How sexist.
>>63650154
yeah, why not get BriBri
![51I6V9IE5PL._SY373_BO1,204,203,200_[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/1xOYIri.jpg "51I6V9IE5PL._SY373_BO1,204,203,200_[1].jpg")
>>63650154
Because this is grandpa's magazine. Remember when Reader's Digest was popular? All the old people are dying senpaitachi.
>>63655343
It should me Padame
>>63649966
pretty sure I fapped to this issue
>>63650154
Madison Ivy would have been my pick.
>>63659683
Coneheads get me off too
>>63659499
>implying everyone just isnt becoming more moral.
>>63659683
>>63659846
>>63649966
>millenials will never understand what's it like to find dirty old porn magazines in the woods
>>63655084
Not for a serial killer, I'd venture to guess. There's nothing, warm, fuzzy and romantic going on there. Just bust that nut and kill the urges, not the bitches.
>>63649966
I am 23 and know exactly who Anna Nicole and Dan Aykroyd are.
>>63659872
>people are becoming more moral
Bro, the internet would like a word with you.
We're just going through another hypocritical phase where people will act inhibited while being anything but behind closed doors.
>>63660050
yeah im joking. my state just legalized dude weed and gay marrage.
>>63649966
Did everybody find the bunny head on the cover? Every issue had one
>>63649966
Playboy was sexist trash, welcome to 2015 Playboy.
![imrs[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vquHrVG.jpg "imrs[1].jpg")
>>63660328
Yeah. Welcome to 2015 Maxim. It's run by women now. I swear looking thru it is like witnessing a clueless woman looking for a gift in the men's department for her man. Good thing I have a free subscription. Men's Journal is so much better and nobody today wants to look at half-naked, airbrushed women and celebs that's weak.
>>63650251
You are millennial garbage with shit taste.
>>63649966
I would love to gnarfle her garthok if you know what I mean
