>it's going to be bad
>9.5/10
So can you admit you were wrong?
I never said it was going to be bad
I'm predicting a solid ~90% RT score
>>63643152
Same.
RT gave JJ's Star Trek 94%.
>PG-13
Depends on your metric of success
>>63643107
>supporting paid reviews
ST Into Darkness got ~90% and that was almost unwatchable.
So no, I don't care about the opinion of anyone that's able to sit through one of those CGI snorefests and then also be willing to call it good.
>>63643170
This world is made of garbage
>>63643107
i-is that what imdb looks like on a phone?
>>63643107
this is irrelevant. every blockbuster starts from that rating
>Less than 2000 reviews
>Half of them are paid reviews
/tv/ really wants this movie to fail
>>63643107
>9.5
>Other movies like The Avengers held 8.8 scores or higher before more than 2K people reviewed the film
>>63643787
Don't you?
it would be much more interesting than having a safe action movie like The Hobbit without the behind scenes stuff.
It is really standards and practices the movie.
>>63643787
hilarious isn't it, I don't understand why though
>>63643836
The Avengers is the best Marvel film so yeah... not saying it deserves a 8.8 but still atleast it is the best capeshit film from Marvel.
>>63643107
>/tv/ still doesn't know IMDB ratings is user based
Fuck this shit board.
>>63643336
Maybe it's just your taste.
