>>63631354
First formulate an argument supporting your opinion.

>>63631364

Too lazy.
Similiarities:
>cringe worthy b-movie tier acting and script, in the context of junk-food spiritualism/religion and a perplexing sci-fi angle
>crawling in my skin-tier social criticism and understanding of history

>>63631423
>extremely overblown and comically retarded in how it takes itself and its fortune cookie wisom way too seriously

I liked the future and far future segments

>I don't like movies which require thought.

>>63632192
>we are all connected and stuff and karma and rebirth
>we should all like stop following a hierarchy and...just connect you know, like racism and corporations are all wrong and stuff
>woah so deep dude

Please be trolling. This movie is

>>63632151
Costumes and stories were b-movie tier. Below a stargate episode actually.

>>63632776
a depiction of what fat, lazy westerners imagine buddhism to be.

>>63632776
> corporations are all wrong and stuff
Where in the fuck were you getting this from the movie? The asian future segment? Because it's just a cliche dystopia.

>>63633085

The 70's oil 'crime' story, retard. Although you could argue that the future and colonial past segment fall into a similiar theme.
Cliche yeah, everything is clichee in this movie.