Why did they fail so bad releasing this, woulda had my cash by now but they pussied out. Now theres too much coming out to bother w it.
It's not very good anyway. It looks nice but the whole film is one big "What did he mean by this?" with zero emotional investment or tension.
>>63616268
They tanked it because Steve Jobs flopped, Fassbender in trouble boiz
>>63616471
And now he's turned to videogame shit. Once Assassin's Creed flops all we need to do is wait for his capeshit career to run its course and then Fassbender is fucking over. Finally.
Shakespeare is not a money maker
Nobody but internet movie nerds and critics care about Fassbender. Jobs was his possible star making role but it flopped
It got middling reviews, so no hype or possible awards to advertise
>>63617402
>internet movie nerds
You mean "such a movie buff xD"s. He caters to the easily impressed IMDB demographic. Not the actual disciples of the medium.
You guys know what a limited release is, right? Just checking
All reviews I read say this is strictly for Shakespeare mentalists. How many of them do you know?
>>63617584
Al the negative reviews I read seemed to be from Shakespeare fans who didn't like the adaptation. It seems to be more for casual SP fans than anything
>>63617584
>Shakespeare mentalists
>>63617522
>actual disciples of the medium.
>Benning, Diaz, Kirsanoff, Terayama ... the list goes on!!!!!
>>63617522
>Not the actual disciples of the medium.