>"SHEEV PALPATINE IS A SITH LORD!"
>>63559108
please present the evidence
>>63559108
>>63559108
>He was too dangerous to be left alive
- Sheev about Dooku
>He's too dangerous to be left alive!
- Windu about Sheev
Seriously, does it get more poetic than this?
>>63559535
yes
Anakin watched as the emperor killed Mace, refusing to step in and save him
thus becoming Darth Vader
Darth Vader saves Luke by killing the emperor while he was being electrocuted
thus restoring the balance of the force
>>63560940
Was Luke the reincarnation of Windu? He was born very soon after Windu's death.
>>63560961
hmm maybe, im not sure how reincarnation works in the star wars universe. but for a jedi, luke did have a temper like mace
>>63560961
perhaps padme was windu'd
HEY /TV/ BROS
What's the best way to watch all the star wars movies exactly?
I haven't seen them in like ten years.
Fan edits? Blu rays? Laserdisc something or other? Help me out yo
>>63561034
Odd numbered episodes then evens
>>63561034
I mean if you go with the blu rays youre gonna get great picture and sound quality but also 90s CGI and added retarded shit
The other option is Despecialized which is a fan edit that combines the blu ray with old footage to recreate the theatrical
>>63561034
i watched a fan edit of the prequels mostly revolving around anakin and then the original trilogy
>>63561105
Was it "The Phantom Edit"?
I've heard good things but I'm skeptical.
>>63561075
Is the blu ray CG shit as bad as people say?
>>63559108
>palpatine
Thanks for posting his name
>>63560961
>a black man being reborn as white
That's not how it works
>>63561123
yup thats the one, it was pretty good. they took out a lot of unnecessary bullshit
>>63561123
I mean the CGI in the special editions was made in 97 and hasn't been updated much.
The only movie is truly fucks up is Episode IV but it does make all the movies weaker 90% of the time. But for a non fanboy it shouldn't hurt your experience too much
>>63561123
i would at least watch the OT first before you watch anything prequel related
>>63561123
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jzZOgLH4KU
>>63561184
I assume by OT you mean original trilogy?
>>63561034
In the cinema in the late 1970s-early 1980s
