>Voldemort is one of the most powerful wizards in the world
>rivaled only by Dumbledore
>gets completely BTFO by a disarming spell
>not once but multiple times
Honestly, I used to love this series when I was younger but the older I get the more retarded it seems. JK Rowling is a horrible writer with no sense of continuity.
I'm hype for the trailer.
I think that has only happened twice. In GOF and the last one.
>>63553751
w8 4 it....
>>63553751
>couldn't touch or cast a spell on baby Harry Potter after killing the potters
>couldn't just grab a lamp in the room and chuck it hard into the crib at baby Harry.
>>63553839
Except he got BTFO by le power of love and had to split the scene after he killed Lily.
>>63553839
He died as soon as he cast a spell you fuckwit.
>>63553751
That pretty much sums of Harry Potter nicely what else did you want to discuss about it or was the whole point of this to just state the obvious that every one realized years ago?
what the heck did you expect?? Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects?all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>But at least the books are ggood though!
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>>63553839
Nothing would have happened to him dumbass.
>>63553908
hola reddit
>>63553751
why was Potter so scared of using a killing spell against someone who obviously will kill thousands of innocents when he gets the chance?
literally as retarded as Batman's no killing rule.
>black could be anywhere
What did the screenwriter mean by this?
>>63553997
>Black in the back
what did the AC/DC mean by this?
>>63553908
>"If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
BTFO
>>63553967
I think it's because casting spells with a wand isn't exactly a like pressing a trigger on a gun.
You probably need to be really hateful and broken to channel the necessary energy to effectively get out a killing spell.
>>63553967
because its for children you dumb pedo
>the wand chooses the wizard
>until you get hit with a disarming spell and it says fuck you, it belongs to that guy now
That was the stupidest thing. Especially since they teach the disarming spell in their second year, so you could have kids just disarming and stealing other kids wands.
It would have been better if the disarm to achieve ownership of wand was unique to the Elder Wand.
>>63554194
it just means that a certain wand is "right" for you, not that it's impossible to use others
plus the whole idea was that the Elder Wand is a meme and Voldie was just autistically minmaxing
>>63553751
FUCK CONTINUITY
>>63553967
He was never scared to kill voldie
>>63554102
so what? Hook there were kids who's only reason was to KILL pirates, one of em got a sword in the belly, yet it's still a movie for kids.
deaths can still be watched by kids
>>63554475
That was in the 90s(unless you're talking about the new movie that came out this year)
Things have changed quite a bit since then. Even now things from 5 years ago like RDJ in Tropic Thunder wouldn't pass