Okay, let's be serious for a moment. Everyone agrees that 5 > 4 > 6 > 3 > 2 or 1 > 1 or 2, right? There's no actual debate on this, right?
I'd agree, though I haven't seen the prequels since they first came out and have no idea what I'd rank them.
5 4 6 1 2 3
>>63496276
5>4> 6( original script would have made it the best)>3>power gap>1>2
P much tho hipsters will try to say 1》2 even tho the onlu good part of 1 was the maul fight
A new hope is literally the best
5 > 4 > 3 > 6 > 1 > 2
Han should have died in 6
>>63496361
Muh podracing scene
Also, this!
5>4=6>1=3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2
5 > 4 > 3 > 6 > 1 > 2
Return of the Jedi had many of the things that made the prequels garbage (racial tokenism, pandering to different age groups, following charts and graphs about demographics instead of just making a great movie). And 3 had shining moments as well as awful ones.
V>IV>VI>III>>I>>>>II
Roman Up Niggas
5>4>3>6>1>2
>>63496276
RoJ>>>new hope for me but the rest of the ranking is okay.
Not at all.
>123
You already know it because of social media memes
>star wars 4
George Lucas is the master of oversimplification. All the characters in Star Wars are terribly black and white and not a single one even remotely leans towards the second dimension. The cheap trick to use plain text as exposition for the upcoming events is a slap in the face of cinema. The entire purpose of film is to convey stories through dialogue and images.Lucas doesn't get that.His writing skills are pre-school.
>star wars 5
The most over rated movie of all time. Pseudo nerds will have you believing that george lucas ruined this movie that was once so great even though they probably didnt even see the original version until after the new ones came out. You can find these geek posers at your local comic cons repeating everything plinkett says wearing there han shot first shirt thinking they sound like they know what there talking about, but take it from me these movies are on par with bollywood scifi shit dont waste your time.
>star wars 6
Let's see, for an adventure, the pacing is mostly off, with lots of periods where nothing happens, and even the action scenes are nothing special. The plot also seems fairly contrived. Say, since this is the final battle between good and evil and all that, the emperor's preparations seem fairly rushed. You'd expect more care to have been taken in keeping that shield intact, for example. Also, since his grand scheme is to turn Luke Skywalker to the dark side of the force, isn't he trying to kill him too soon after Luke offers some resistance?
5 4 3 6 1 2
ANYONE who puts 3 above 6 is meme-ing or being a hipster tryhard
just because youre a revisionist fuck that thinks ewoks are SO BAD they ruin what is ultimately THE BEST ACTION SEQUENCE and HEARTWRENCHING EMOTIONAL CLIMAX of the entire trilogy then your opinion need not be noted
I > II > CW 2D&3D > III > Rebels > IV > SW Holiday Special > V > VI > VII
6 > 5 > 4 > shit > 3 = 2 = 1
2 was the best, it's the only one that really tried to explore the human condition.
6 5 4 1 3 2
>>63496564
Obi Wan telling Anakin he loved him was pretty nice senpai. everything on Endor is trash
I believe the widely accepted order is
5>4>6>3>2>1
My personal order is
4>5>6>3>1>2
In any case, I am certain that EVERYONE is agreed that
Best
4 and 5
Middle
6 and 3
Worst
1 and 2
>>63496423
Three had some great fucking moments, as much as Lucas tried to fuck things up it still managed to pull through in a few areas. God, if it didn't have those stupid little things that were obviously George's ideas (silly voice battle droids, overly dense battle sequences with CGI storm troopers, dialogue even my twelve year old self thought was retarded when I saw it "Oh Eye don't think so, etc") then it would have been the best Star Wars since Empire Strikes Back. Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones are both well beyond repair, but if some indie movie company with decent CGI editing skills and good voice actors went in and fixed certain things then Revenge of the Sith would shine like it was meant to. We can only hope.
>>63496530
Pseudo intellectual fedora tipper detected.
You're to caught up trying to compare it to something it's not trying to be. Even though it excels at what it is. Stop and smell the roses.
>>63496885
Or suffocate on the air you will never see.
4 5 6 3 2 1
Come at me.
>>63496613
Son... you do know how meme arrows work, right?
6 > 5 > 4 > 1 > 3 > 2
>>63496744
Plot wise Revenge of the Sith was by far the best since Empire. No stupid senate shit to get in the way anymore, Sheev had his army and was ready to fuck shit up. He set up Anakin to be his apprentice by faking visions of Padme dying, and took advantage of the most powerful Jedi being dispersed throughout the galaxy fighting the separatists to massacre the undefended padawans and non-combat support Jedi (no idea what they are actually called but I'm sure they existed) and completely destroy the Jedi as an organization with galactic influence. Besides Sheev's flawlessly executed scheming, you also have the first signs of legitimate emotion in the Anakin/Obi Wan relationship. Instead of just being forced like in the last movie (NEST OF GUNDARKS MOTHERFUCKER) the final confrontation between Anakin and his former master generates some pretty deep feels that takes you completely by surprise since it's the first time the Prequel Trilogy so much as hinted at having a soul. Watching an emotionally upset Obi Wan abandon his best friend while he burns alive is actually a very moving scene. It also goes to show that Hayden probably did have some decent acting chops after all, but it was wasted on mediocre dialogue and the most awkward and forced romance ever pictured on the silver screen.
>>63496744
;_;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_YozYt8l-g
What's up with this "RotJ is the best" meme?
I can maybe understand preferring it over ONE of the other two originals, but both? As if.
7 > 4 > 5 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 2
6 > 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 >1
1. Empire
2. ROTJ
3. New Hope
POWER GAP
4. Phantom Menace
POWER GAP
9000000001. ROTS
POWER GAP THE SIZE OF THE GALAXY
90000000000000001. AOTC
5 > 4 > 3 > 6 > 1 > 2
>>63496396
I think Han dying could have been better but who knows. The original scripting for the movie could have been phenomenal. But a happy ending works really well with the kind of story Star Wars is. If only the ending celebrations in VI wasn't so cheesy and was more like IVs.
Also,
> 5> 4> 3> 6
>ever
This is the worst opinion^ it needs to stop. Minus the ewoks nothing seems genuinely retarded in the movie. ROTS has retarded plot, characterization, tone, logic, pacing and acting at many points. It does some things right (much better than the other 2 prequels), but ROTJ does most things right.
>>63496276
5>4>3>6>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2>1
There's nothing good about Revenge and certainy not better than RotJ regardless of how many problems RotJ may have.
>>63497226
Not a meme.
I just prefer it over 4 and 6.
Calling opinions memes don't make them wrong.
>>63497367
4 and 5*
4>5>6
There is no others Star Wars movies.
None of the prequels match any of the originals and it's not just "muh nostalgia" it's the fact Hayden Christensen is the worst fucking thing to ever happen to the franchise. Phantom Menace was the only passable prequal and would be on equal standing with the originals if it wasn't for JarJar fucking Binks and Jake Lloyd.
>>63496276
I like all six movies equally.
>>63497433
Not equal standing but definitely not that far below New Hope.
>>63496276
5>4>6
Huge drop in quality here.
1>3=2
Phantom at least has a somewhat coherent story. All the prequels are shit, but 2 and 3 are fucking garbage.
But for real
How do some of you think that TPM is worse than AOTC? TPM is a shitty kids movie, AOTC is an abomination.
>Revenge is better because it's more dark.
JUST
Hey can anyone point me to a good site to stream all movies? I'm trying to rewatch all before new one comes out. Thanks
>>63497353
All the scenes in Sheevs Throne in the Death Star are GOAT. Nothing in any prequel even comes close. Those scenes alone transcend RoTJ above the crap that is RotS.
RotJ is a steak. And it may be a bit of a bland one at some bites but it's still a fucking steak. RotS is a fucking turd. Given it may not stink terribly or be diarrhea getting everywhere, running down the back of ones pant leg. It's still a fucking shit. It just happened I land in the porcelain bowl.
>>63497559
In AOTC the scenes with Anakin and Padmé are worse than any Jar-Jar scenes.
>>63497589
Google Kodi and Genesis addon
>>63497367
hey, buddy. if it's a relatively new opinion and it's spreading across the internet, it's a fucking meme. that doesn't mean it's good or bad. but i agree that calling 6 better than 4 or 5 is a contrarian bullshit argument. aside from the throne room it's got nothing. tatooine and endor are both boring af.
different poster btw.
>>63497620
I like the Ewoks.
The battle of Endor could have been better. I wouldnt want Ewoks beheading stormtroopers, but it could a bit more believable.
But I like it nonetheless because you're not supposed to expect it.
>>63497641
>Kodi and Genesis addon
Thanks I'll check this out.
>Star Wars? Well the last four movies were terrible. This next one ought to be good!
Great logic there, America
>>63497817
If you make an infinite number of Star Wars movies, eventually one must be good!
>>63496276
I liked Return of the Jedi more than Star Wars
>>63497817
I fully expect it to be a dim soulless cash-in and for me to walk out appreciating what the prequels tried to do a lot more than a Disney factory product.
>>63496276
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6LeL3s4Q80
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mj07qh51zPI
>You fought in the Clone Wars?
>Yes. I was once a Jedi Knight, the same as your father.
>I remember the good ol' days, back when me, Anakin, Yoda, and Master Dindu were basically Jedi Super Sayians. We could destroy armies single-handedly, run at lightning fast speed, deflect blaster bolts with stunning precision, jump tens of thousands of feet in the air, and hover around for prolonged periods of time. "Crouching Jedi, Hidden Sith" sums up that era well.
>Now that I'm an old man, I can't do any of that anymore. Time is not a good friend.
>>63497862
Jedi is my favorite Star Wars movie but I think the other two have more artistic merit desu senpai.
>>63497891
I>VII
it is known
>>63497817
You could say that about James Bond films considering the Roger Moore era.
I just watched episode 3
it's so utter dogshit that im actually beginning to think episode 2 was better
imo it's
5>4>>>6>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2>3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1
V>IV>VI>III>II>I
V is just an excellently shot movie with tons of character. Everything about that movie is so expansive.
IV is the most fantasy kind of them all. It has a lot of universe building and it just flows really good, and the editing really helps.
VI is great. Even with the Ewoks. It just lacks some of the things that made IV and V so good, but it's still a great film.
III is still shit with it's dialog, but at least it's not completely boring and not completely focused on space politics like the other two prequels are.
II is not so good. I like Obi-Wan doing detective work on Kamino was really cool, but that's about it. It's garbage.
I is garbage like II, but I just don't get why it starts so early. Like, we see so many of these things that just don't feel necessary.
I don't understand this trend of people reading rots over rotj. Do you guys actually believe this?
>>63498002
Casino was pretty good but the Brosnan and the other Craig films were just cashins
>>63496276
>Okay, let's be serious for a moment. Everyone agrees that 5 > 4 > 6 > 3 > 2 or 1 > 1 or 2, right? There's no actual debate on this, right?
you mean, star wars is trash, always has been trash and always will be trash and anything related to star wars is trash.
>>63498127
3 > 6
Search in your feelings you know this is true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VdQ6oMzV2U
>>63496276
I had my 9 year old nephew watch star wars for the first time. I had him watch the original trilogy first and then the prequels spread out over 2 months. His ratings are
4 - 7/10
5 - 8/10
6 - 9/10
1 - 8/10
2 - 9/10
3 - 10/10
his reasoning is the episodes with more jedi fighting made them better
>>63498213
3 and 6 are also debatable but 1 and 2 are fucking awful
>>63496276
Yes you're absolutely right.
I - 5/10
II - 4/10
III - 6/10
IV - 9/10
V - 9/10
VI - 8/10
>>63498256
3 > 2 = 6 > 1 = 5 > 4
Smack some sense into that little shit
>>63498256
>9 years
> couldn't even comprehend the plot
At least he picked the best flick
>>63497126
Oh, sorry, thought it was viewing order thread.
Then it's
V = IV > CW 2D &3D series > VI > Rebels > III > I = II > CW Movie
>>63498313
>>63498315
the biggest problem I had with him watching is he already knew about Vader being Luke's father because of stupid star wars angry birds shit
Also Darth Maul was his favorite Sith
Luke his favorite Jedi
>>63497212
This so much.
Which leaves us with
V>IV>III>VI>I>II
Nothing can save Attack of the Clones tho.
>>63497320
except you're wrong
3 has good pacing, good fight scenes, drama, and it ties everything together.
6 has shit pacing, awkward plot resolution, underwhelming fight scenes, ewoks, and muh second death star.
Sure, RotJ had some great scenes (the throne room scenes and Darth Vader's death are among my favorites of the entire franchise), and RotS had shit acting, but objectively RotS is the better film.
Thinking empire is better than a new hope is like thinking last crusade is better than temple of doom. You're just wrong, and belong on reddit.
>>63498174
Goldeneye is top tier Bond film. Search your feelings. You know it to be true
>>63498256
Is it to late to convince your brother/sister to have an abortion?
>>63496755
no one worth their shit will put clones above phantom menace
Phantom Menace is a clusterfuck of a story, but it isn't as offensive to me as Attack of the Clones.
>>63497651
I still think 6 is better than 4 and 5.
Stick your fingers in your ears and be a dumbass but it's true.
>>63498442
... I'm not arguing with an idiot. Have a good day.
>>63497651
You fucking spergs will label anything a meme these days...
>>63498444
This statement is false unless you're 50 and saw 4 in the theaters and were blown away by it.
>>63498444
Trips of truth
>>63498522
You can like it more as a personal preference but you can't say its a better movie than the first two with any sense of credibility.
>>63498567
Based on what quantifiable measurement?
You can't measure how great a movie is.
Sure you can go by critics, but those are opinions, not imperial measurements.
In no way is it totally undeniably fact that 4 or 5 are better than 6.
And credibility?
Losing credibility is when you say Catwoman is better than The Godfather, not when you say RotJ is better than ESB or ANH.
>>63498743
>In no way
I guess we could talk about the average audience ratings...
IMDb:
1. V - 8.8/10
2. IV - 8.7/10
3. VI - 8.4/10
4. III - 7.7/10
5. II - 6.7/10
6. I - 6.5/10
Or we could talk about the average critic ratings...
RT Critics Ratings:
1. V - 8.9/10
2. IV - 8.5/10
3. III - 7.3/10
4. VI - 7.1/10
5. II - 6.7/10
6. I - 6/10
Or we could talk about Academy Awards...
1. IV - Nominated for 10, won 6
2. V - Nominated for 3, won 1
3. VI - Nominated for 4, won 0
4. I - Nominated for 3, won 0
5. II - Nominated for 1, won 0
6. III - Nominated for 1, won 0
"In no way" is it fact that 4 or 5 are better than 6? Go fuck yourself, you contrarian faggot. It can be measured in many, many ways, and in all ways is 6 inferior.
>>63498915
And all of that (including the academy awards) are based on opinion, you dickless faggot.
You're fighting my opinion with other OPINIONS.
You're an absolute shithead plain and simple.
>>63498972
>Fighting one opinion with literally millions of other opinions has no merit.
>>63498989
No it fucking doesn't.
You telling me that 500 million people prefer ESB over Jedi still won't convince me that I think Jedi is a better movie.
How autistic are you?
>Director: HEY BRYAN WE'RE ABOUT TO START SHOOTING LETS GO
>Hamill: Sorry I can't find my reddit suit I don't how I'm going to meme my way through this scene without it
Congrats, you now know everything you need to know about Breaking Bad from reading these two sentences.
>>63498972
>hurr your constructive points of debate don't count you're just a faggot just let me like my movie leave me alone durr
Don't post in these threads if you''re not willing to discuss things reasonably.
>>63499076
But you aren't debating jackshit.
You're trying to convince me that ESB and ANH are better movies than Jedi.
It's a subjective thing and you can't change my opinion when it comes to subjectivity, you regard.
>>63499040
No, I'm saying that there is a vast difference between saying "I like this movie" and saying "this movie is good".
Can you really not appreciate that? You can like whatever movies you like, senpai. Doesn't bother me.
I know V is better than IV, but I prefer IV.
>>63499107
Retard*
>>63499107
Yawn. Three different people (that I count) trying to tell you to calm down and learn the difference between subjectivity and objectivity and you're still throwing a tantrum.
>>63499119
"This movie is good" and "I like this movie" are just as subjective as one another. It's an opinion. Opinions are not wrong or right, they just are.
>>63499167
I was the one telling that difference, not one person (all the same guy by the way) has been able to tell the difference.
>>63499180
>"This movie is good" and "I like this movie" are just as subjective as one another.
No, they fucking aren't. It's like saying you like an actor vs someone is a good actor. Are you really unable to tell the difference or are you just being stubborn?
>>63499167
>Yawn.
Literally the first thing I thought of.
>>63497947
> what is an over the top cartoon
>>63499248
People don't understand that not everything is subjective when it comes to entertainment
>>63499248
So you're saying that me saying "Matthew Modine is a good actor" ISN'T subjective?
Do you understand the definition of subjectivity?
>>63499248
Then tell me how to quanitfy if a movie is good or not?
streaming Raiders Of The Lost Ark
http://www.hitbox.tv/Sheev66
>>63499209
Senpai, you seem to be saying that nothing to do with art can be subjective, while we're just trying to explain that there are many different ways to quantify the quality of art.
Again, feel free to like whatever you want, but even teenagers can understand the nuance between "It's good, it's just not my kind of thing" and "This is bad."
Similarly, there is a difference between "This is bad" and "This is bad, but I like it anyway"
>>63499311
The other anon linked several here >>63498915. You could also look at box-office for inflation, other awards ceremonies, respected authorities in the field, etc, etc.
>>63497213
Loved him enough to not kill him, rather let him live through the tremendous pain that must come with being burnt by fire. Also I was under the impression that jedi were not allowed to 'love'
>>63499427
>Similarly, there is a difference between "This is bad" and "This is bad, but I like it anyway"
Or rather, there is a difference between "This is good" and "This is bad, but I like it anyway".
My bad.
>>63499424
Spielberg really needs to direct a star wars movie.
5>4>1>3>6>2
George wanted to make a whole movie about the jedi, their believings and habits. Obiwan would be introduced in the second movie. But that would have been completely idiotic. So episode I is a movie about two jedi just doing their job and of them happens to be obiwan.
Episode I is the best looking film out of the prequels, has great designs and in the german dub anakin actually is a nice little boy.
Based/10 would watch again
>>63499427
Did you actually read my posts?
I literally said that everything in film is subjective.
That was the entire point I was trying to make.
>>63496276
One, is the worst of the movies you'll ever find.
Two, can be as bad as one, but the Clone Wars series makes it sort of fun.
6 > 1 > 3 > 2 > TCW > 4 > 5
I will speak
4 > 5 > 3 > 6 > 2 > 1
>>63499424
comfy keks
>>63499521
Yes, and what I'm trying to get you to wrap your head around is that while one's enjoyment of a film is subjective, the quality of a film is objective.
>>63499536
>Two, can be as bad as one
Well it's the loneliest number since the number one..
>>63496276
6 > 4 > 5
The prequels can't be rated, they are all shit
>>63499521
Eh, I give up. I can't think of another way to explain it, nor can I imagine that I'll ever be able to explain it to you.
You're either an idiot who can't be helped, or just so outrageously stubborn that you're just pretending not to understand while arguing obtusely.
Either way.
>>63499625
I gave up explaining to him the moment he started refuting my initial argument. I knew he'd be an idiot.
Tommy Wiseau is the best actor of all time. You can't tell me different.
>>63499625
>>63499588
There is no such thing as an objectively good or bad film.
You've failed to tell me what makes a film good or bad except for others opinion, opinion which is a subjective thing in nature.
http://www.reelfanatics.com/2010/02/19/the-myth-of-objective-film-criticism/
Do the directors cuts of the prequels make them better?
1: Nothing was good except Amadala's chineseque wardrobe [at least it was interesting]
2: The Jedi Library was a cool concept, wish it was explored more
3: Nothing was good, wasted oppertunies around every corner
4: Mystery was ok, Force was ok, Han was ok, Chewie was ok, Vader was OK.
R2 and 3PO are overrated. So is the princess.
The aunt and uncle should have gotten more screen time, their deaths felt like nothing.
5: You barely see cloud city.
Yoda was cool, but it would have been more interesting if there were other sentient creatures on the planet he interacted with, keeping his ID a secret to all. Bigger reveal then. Hoth was boring.
6: Second Death Star? One note show.
I liked the idea of the ewoks, but they were played too comically. Should have made them into Wookies like planned.
Leia being Lukes sister was stupid.
The whole thing needs more blue milk, less whiney or helpless characters.
More character development.
Overall, I love the original concept, but it lost me over time.
>>63499678
Oh, no! Not reel fanatics!
>>63499666
>waaaaahhhh, he doesn't agree with me, let's call him an idiot.
Fuck you too, faggot.
>>63496276
Yeah I'm down with that list
>>63499678
>all art is of equal objective quality
lol'd hard
>>63496276
>There's no actual debate on this, right?
There shouldn't be, but for some fucking reason there is. Return of the Jedi is a pretty flawed movie with some stupid decisions and Han Solo stands in front of a door for 40 minutes because the script had nothing left for him to do because he was supposed to die in Act 1. However despite its flaws its a fun 80's space adventure movie and has some great characterization, some wonderfully shot fight scenes and a pretty impressive space battle.
Revenge of the Sith is a wheelbarrow full of dog turds hurtling down a hillside but because the dog turds aren't on fire this time it's seen as an insane improvement over the previous films and is given a lot more credit than it's really due. When you read about what went on during the production of the film ( How Star Wars Conquered the Universe being a good place to start ) or how the entire story for Anakin's turn was suddenly changed last minute, or realize that every single problem in Episode I and II are still present in the film it really loses all of its appeal. People heap a shitload of praise on it because it's darker in tone, it has 3 big lightsaber fights, and Sheev does things. That's it. If you actually think about the movie critically and stop to consider character actions, the purpose behind all of these fights and the story being told it's collapses like a house of cards.
Return of the Jedi kind of sucks, no doubt. Revenge of the Sith is a goddamn disaster.
>>63499666
>Tommy Wiseau is the best actor of all time.
I disagree with you but I since there is no objective way to quantifiable disprove an opinion, you aren't wrong.
>>63499712
That is literally the opposite of what that post said.
>>63499678
Film has an intent, to communicate.
If you suck at communication and distract your audience with bullshit, then from both an empirical and epistemological point of view, it is objectively, scientifically a bad film.
End of argument. For all time.
>But what if you're trying to confuse people because you're a total artistic badass
Autists, please go.
>>63499728
But can an opinion be deemed irregular and contrary to those of both of the public at large and experts in the specific field? If that's the case it's just the same as being wrong.
>>63499678
>>63499712
Literally the equivalent of a mother patting her retarded son on the head and telling him his finger-painting is as good as his prodigy sister's, because "mum said it was just as good".
Don't be so daft.
>>63499765
Film's intent isn't to communicate, it is to entertain.
As in all forms of entertainment, no form of entertainment is wrong or right or good or bad objectively. It can only be judged from a person to person basis on how that entertainment made them, subjectively feel.
>>63499779
So you're saying if everyone in the world but you thought Godfather sucked but you thought it was amazing, then you're wrong?
That's not an intelligent way of thinking that something is just because the larger group thinks that way it make it right or good.
>>63499751
Is it? Looks to me like it says no film is objectively better than another, which means they are all objectively equal.
How is that not what it says?
>>63498915
wait wait back the fuck up, star wars won 6 academy awards?
>>63499779
You can have an opinion and still be wrong.
>I think rabbits are reptiles.
That's an opinion, and it's wrong, it can be proven to be wrong.
>I think rabbits are better than reptiles
Is also an opinion but it's hard to argue that it's wrong because the argument is all about taste which is inherently subjective.
Also for anyone paying attention the fact that we have to explain objective vs. subjective every other fucking thread is a good indicator of how many children are on this board.
>>63499802
To entertain on purpose is a form of communication.
Do you even know what communication is?
Because if you think it's just talking, you're an autist.
Communication is any attempt to interact through mediums [media is actually the plural for medium].
Entertainment is called "media" or a "medium" because it exists as a form of communication between the maker and the intended audience.
Go to school.
>>63499700
It's ok to be a retard with poor taste, anon. But don't try and convince others that the shit you eat actually taste good.
I'm sure a nice dinner out to you means a Hometown Buffet.
how hot would it be within a few inches of a lightsaber blade?
http://www.hitbox.tv/Sheev66
>>63499857
About as hot as space would be since it's full of something that allows for the transmission of sound as well as provides enough drag for star wars spaceships to fly through it like world war II fighter planes.
>>63497817
>6
>bad
I love this meme.
>>63499826
Well, yes, but that's a bit of a poor example, because the Godfather is acclaimed. A better example would be to say that if everyone thinks the Godfather is excellent (because nearly everyone does) and then you say it sucks donkey balls, does that mean you're wrong?
And the answer is yes.
>>63499826
If it were the case that a majority of that size thought The Godfather was a bad film or whatever then it would mean that the culture, values, morals and beliefs of that world would be different than that of our current world. 100 years ago some film with a lot nudity may have been seen as bad but now all the nudity is for a large part ignored. Everything is relative.
>>63499851
So again, just because you can't prove me wrong, you just throw up your hands and say I have shit taste?
Ok.
>>63499918
You have been proven wrong. Everyone knows it but you.
>>63499845
Almost won best picture too.
>>63496276
5 > 4 > 7 > 6 > 3 > 1 > 2
>>63499845
Sure did.
Some ancient civilizations thought human sacrifice was great. Our current society thinks it's absolutely horrendous. The right opinion and the wrong opinion changed based on the society and their values.
4 > 5 > 6 > 1 = 3 > 2
A New Hope is self-contained and could stand alone as a cult classic without a franchise. This is what gives it the edge over The Empire Strikes back. The Phantom Menace and Revenge of the Sith both have their moments, but are still burdened by "action" scenes the will put you to sleep.
Holy Christ, Attack of the Clones was goddamn awful. What even happened in that movie that was worth depicting? Demystifying Fett was probably the only bit that wasn't repeated in RotS anyway.
>>63499995
Maybe one day in the future society will
have shot off into the opinion that the prequels are objectively better films based off their new found cultural values. That is a definite possibility. It's also a possibility that the society that would think that would be very close to that which is depicted in Idiocracy.
>>63500100
We do the same with older films. Scarface is a great example.
