Why isn't she getting better roles?
>>63416314
One great way to appeal to average people is to complain about trivialities in your incredible lucrative and easy profession.
if everyone just refused to play unimportant roles, you couldn't make a movie
So...if I dont get big paid roles after one giant movie, is sexism?
Now I dont know how Hollywood works but, to me it seems she is saying that all those that offered a job are sexist.
Burning Bridges?
Seems odd, I am going to google her and see if there is no misunderstanding.
yet what women want is submissive shit like twilight and 50 shades of grey
I guess hunger games is an exception but thats already died out
>>63416363
Man, don't you hate it when you only get paid 2 million dollars for a week of work instead of 3 million dollars? As an average man I can relate to those problems
>vague bullshit trend riding
of course she won't name names or say what was actually sexist. but you bet this will 1k+ RTs with feminist parrots going "fuck the patriarchy you go girl"
>>63416314
This is all Jennifer Lawrence's fault.
She gets her first and more than likely last big role and she thinks she's worthy of playing leading roles in everything else? The ego on this fucking bitch.
>>63416434
>>63416376
By "the bit on the side" she doesn't mean she's being offered minor roles in movies.
She means she's being offered "slut that a guy cheats on his wife with" roles in movies.
"Main character's wife" and "woman main character cheats on his wife with" being two of the most common female roles in the history of screenwriting.
>So what's my role in this movie
>Well, you're playing a woman who...
>A WOMAN? Is that the only way you can describe my character? A WOMAN! FUCKING SEXISM! I refuse to take this role!
>literally the bit on the side
What did she mean by this?
Also, why wouldn't the vast majority of films be "sexist"?? People do still understand there are innate differences between men and women right? What roles does she expect outside of sci fi mary sue bad ass bitch tropes?
>>63416518
>"Main character's wife" and "woman main character cheats on his wife with" being two of the most common female roles in the history of screenwriting.
Source?
>>63416535
>>63416539
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/a-bit-on-the-side
she isnt Meryl Streep, daisy is not in a position to turn down work because after Star Wars she'll disappear forever like Carrie Fisher.
dumb cunt needs to strike while the iron is hot.
>>63416518
oic
maybe she should learn to into screenwriting if she isn't satisfied with what other people write.
>>63416584
Those aren't statistics about the types of roles that women have played in film throughout recent history.
>>63416314
>Making up problems
>Not starting with smaller roles and then moving on up
>>63416518
>women whoring their sexuality is empowering
>but it's sexist when I need to be trendy
>>63416584
>british people call a jizz slit "a bit on the side"
>>63416314
>a DNB complaining her "acting" is not taken seriously
>killing your career before your first movie is even out
Not a particularly smart way to jumpstart your career, but she has the safety net of upcoming STAR WARS movie more than anyone in the new cast, she can theoretically build solid revenue for the rest of her life if she plays her cards right with that franchise.
Boyega is being smarter in not advocating for any particular cause (yet, at least) and trying to branch off into serious role to build a solid repertoire.
She's only being paid $70 million for the trilogy and Boyega is getting $80 million. If that's not sexism what is?
Being offered roles as a kekoldress after being signed as a main character in 3 billion dollar movies is pretty insulting tbqh.
Eww, what actress could possibly play a wife who could lose her husband to friggin Daisy Ridley?
literally nobody complaining about getting offered minor roles
>>63416717
>committing career suicide before your debut performance is even out
For what reason?
>>63416791
She will not have any big roles after Star Wars. Her face is not bankable and her acting skill is questionable.
>>63417233
Feminism
>have complaints about mistreatment of your gender
>still partake in it
Why are women such dumb whores?
She'll be fine you dumb kuckolds.
By the time episode 9 airs she'll be the most recognized actress on the fucking planet.
These aren't the shitty prequels we're talking about.
>>63417896
Hamill wasn't by the end of the OT, lad
Dumb broads don't even know when they've had a lucky break
Unlike Boyega she hasn't got more roles lined up yet. She has to explain it somehow - but of course the real reason is that word will have gotten around about her performance in TFA.
>>63416314
Daisy confirmed to be a shitty actress.
SW7 will be the new prequels.
I'm sure she will land a role in Prometheus 2 as one of the proto-Xenomorphs
The only actors to survive star wars are ford and mcgregor. Everyone else went to shit. Slj dont count muthafucka
>>63416314
Like anyone outside of Harrison Ford got better roles after Star Wars
>>63418085
This
Boyega's meme will die out, Ridley has no chance, I only expect Isaac to continue his rise in Hollywood tbqh
>>63418123
and the thin fucker from Girls for some reason
Please god please let this movie be a pile of shit
>>63416801
>only being paid $70 million
What an outrage!
Imagine that, being some drama kid that's never been in a widely released film before and only being offered that. She pretty much had to take it to avoid going bankrupt and pay off her alimony
>>63418161
this, TFA being objectively shit is the only Christmas present I want.
>>63416801
That's assuming she's any good in these movies. I mean look at the cast of ANY Star Wars movie. Who had a great career and went on to become a truly phenomenal actor? Harrison Ford and Natalie Portman and the only reason I give Ford credit is because I'm really not aware of his movie career at the time so maybe he was relatively small time. which is why I didn't include Ewan McGreggor, he already established himself before SW and still he hasn't done much really great since. Most SW movies are porn for sci-fi and effects geeks and at best anyone looking to hire an actor or actress because of the movies is looking to cash in on the name recognition while it's hot.
>>63416314
She looks like gollum. She should be taking any role offered to her.
Her forehead looks like a bent knee
>>63416314
Wait, she's calling it sexism because she's not the star?
She's an unproven commodity. She should take a few more "side bits" until she can actually be trusted to carry a film.
> get a role that people would literally kill for just because you're a woman
> complain anyways
This shit is getting out of hand.
The 19th amendment was a mistake.
t. Ameriga
>>63416584
That is not the LITERAL meaning, though.
She is saying LITERALLY the bit on the side.
>>63416584
>>63416535
What a cunt.
She's an unknown who gets the luckiest break of her life and she's mad that she isn't getting nonstop leading roles.
fuck her.
>>63416584
>she's not into keking
JACKPOT
>>63416314
"I've been an actress for 2 years, why aren't I getting more amazing roles? Hollywood must be sexist if they can't see how great I am! I was in Star Wards!"
Seriously, this bitch is 23 years old, has been acting for 2 years, and she already expects to be served on a golden fucking plate. The millenial entitlement runs STRONG in this one.
>>63416314
She literally hasn't been in any movies yet. Her main role hasn't even been seen. I'm all for feminism and shit but wow, that's a reach.
Maybe I'm not reading this right, maybe she's just stating her frustrations about getting offered the main role in another movie. What does this have to do with sexism?
>>63416884
That's shooped, right?
Meanwhile, Judy Greer is still doing mom roles.
>>63417023
QUAD JUMPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH
>>63416314
This level of narcissism and entitlement is unlike anything I've ever seen.
>>63419501
I'LL SWALLOW YOUR SOUL
>>63416314
Wow, why are amerifats women such cunts?
Be honest, Do you guys hate women? Be honest, if a white man made this post you would just call him like entitled or greedy or something. But since shes a minority this posts in this thread are getting hostile and personal
>>63418984
>she's mad that she isn't getting nonstop leading roles.
>>63419253
>and she already expects to be served on a golden fucking plate.
She just wants roles that are actually roles, not "Character X's girlfriend". That's what she's saying. It's essentially what Maisie Williams said a month or so ago, that roles being offered to actresses rarely amount to more than being a love interest and have little character of their own.
>>63419756
>She just wants roles that are actually roles, not "Character X's girlfriend".
those are actual roles.
She is mad that people dare suggest she play side characters rather than leads.
>>63416518
>implying Object of every man's desires isn't the most common by far
>>63419654
>But since shes a minority
>>63418161
It will be. The bitch has no talent.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ehCAFnpc16A
>>63419654
>minority
maybe in China
>>63419756
Don't be a kek.
This is her FIRST FUCKING MOVIE.
She is an unproven actress, and will continue to be so even after because Star Wars is not high art.
Maisie has a proven dramatic role on a recognized show.
>>63420043
im going to be so fucking mad if by the end of the new trilogy oscar isaac will basically just be a glorified minor character
god damn it
>>63420043
wow even Domnhall's delivery of "fire" made me cringe. it's like JJ has critically misjudged the tone.
>>63419654
i hate rich people who complain that they're not slightly richer
classism not sexism
>>63419654
Latino here.
White girls are retards. Especially ones from the land of 1984.
>>63420043
Oh crap, wrong one. Here's her promo.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eMZu8VF3iXE
>>63420359
>where are you from
>BLEEP
>classified, really?
kill me
I'm getting real sick of hearing the whining of entitled cunts who think they shouldn't have to work for anything.
Ugly cunt should be lucky she is getting any work at all.
>>63419654
This >>63420201 and that one >>63420099
