Get fucking hyped!
>>63414974
Spiderman sucks. Big dongdong.
>believing in anything directors/actors/producers/executives say
>not portrayed by tobey maguire
why even bother
...and in another news from february....
>>63415100
I hated him before but now he's being played by the biggest dweebpuss yet. He's like 10 years old....
SPIDER OF MAN VS CAPTAIN OF AMERICA
HMMM I LOVE IT
And your new Mary Jane is...
If this is true (Which it isnt) the spiderman should have a more prominent role in the movie instead of just 10 minutes if screentime. I would be hyped if it wasn't obvious they are only saying this after they got the green light to use spiderman.
>>63415215
All the photoshop in the world can't hide that big ass nose and man face.
She's one hormone treatment from being a dude.
>>63415227
>only 10 minutes of screen time
You retards believe everythign random bloggers say don't you?
>>63415215
fucking insane body
wtf face
>Get fucking hyped!
Why?
>>63415116
What's with Tobeyfags? He's a 40 year old man.
>>63415215
>Mary Jake
ft4u
>>63415215
I think whoever did her face and tit makeup really fucked her up. Still sexier than Dunst.
>>63415392
Yeah, they should like this new spidey, mmmmmm, boy.
>>63415453
>Spiderman is a rookie again
I'm done with this spider faggot.
>>63415752
You won't have to see his origin again at least.
>>63415215
Nope
>>63415899
Isn't the crux of Civil War that Peter decides to unmask?
How can they do that in Civil war...and then tell his origin in the standalone spiderman movie?
>Sony Pictures is still involved.
All hope is lost.
>>63416160
>Isn't the crux of Civil War that Peter decides to unmask
Not really. They wont do it in the film.
>No tobey
>No Garfield
>Mcu
What kinda Spiderman you want /co/?
>>63416191
Sony wouldn't just say they're stepping aside and letting Marvel do everything. They're only there in name. Marvel/Disney/Feige are calling all the shots.
>>63416205
I'm confused then, because I was under the impression Spidey was the main crux for the plot, and a lot of the Cap v Iron man revolved around winning his favor.
What would he do that's important enough to put him in the film? They're trying to say he wasn't shoved in there, and if that's true then shouldn't that mean they were planning to use his Civil War story?
>Being hyped for Spiderman in mcu
Based Sony did it better
>>63416259
jfmsuf
>>63416311
>being hyped for mcu Spiderman
For what purpose
>>63416357
>last two spiderman franchises were boring ass origin stories
>first time we see this spiderman he has no time for origins, only awesomeness
>>63416267
He was a big factor in the sense that Spider-Man, the head to toe covered hero, unmasked himself publicly and then faced the consequences quickly after making him question Tony
>Spiderman
Who's that? Ironman is far more popular and superior, I just hope marvel makes a fourth ironman instead of more Spiderlame
>>63416424
>Who's that? Ironman is far more popular and superior,
Spider-Man is like 100x more popular than Iron Man worldwide.
>>63416412
making who question Tony?
>>63416477
Peter parker.
Tony convinced him to unmask, peter parker immediately got fucked up by doing that, and so he questioned tony's ideology
>>63416578
So then how in the hell would he fit into this story without unmasking?
They will never better the original trilogy. Why bother trying?
>>63416638
That's a good thing.
>>63416461
Bullshit. And don't post that dated toy sales list.
>>63416638
Because money. Why bother asking?
>>63416681
>calls bullshit
>no evidence
You're a fool if you think Iron Man has nearly the popularity of Spiderman. Just because the Iron Man movies were popular doesn't mean the past 30 years of Spidey pop culture have been forgotten.
>>63416424
>>63416681
>Iron Man more popular than spider-man
Holy shit. There's no way to out yourself as a retarded normie than by saying this. Marvel has tried to make Iron Man their new poster boy since he was the launch pad of the their MCU cash cow, but no Marvel character comes close to Spider-Man in terms of popularity. ASM2 was considered a bomb and it made 700million WW.
>outdated toy list
It's not just toys it's merchandizing and it's hardly outdated.
>>63416033
>>63415215
NOBODY WANTS A STRAWBERRY BLONDE MARY JANE YOU STUPID FUCKS
>>63416681
I'm from the UK and I'd honestly never heard of iron man until the movie came out.
As a kid the only marvel things I knew were X-men and Spiderman. Because of the movies and because of the insane spiderman merchandise absolutely everywhere
>>63416893
I disagree
>>63416819
>>63416728
I realize Spiderman is the most popular Marvel hero. But who's more popular worldwide, Batman or Spiderman?
And Superman or Spiderman?
>>63417197
People are more into the stories of spiderman over superman, for sure. Just more people would have heard of superman because... he's superman. He's THE superhero.
Batman is another thing. Spiderman and batman are probably equal. More kids would buy a spiderman lunchbox though
>>63417197
Spider-Man is more popular than Batman or Superman.
He's the most popular hero of all times. Only Mickey Mouse is more recognizable than Spider-Man.
Why don't I believe this?
>>63417316
Batman is most popular, then Spider-Man
