[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
IT'S OVER INNARITU AND LEO CONTRIBUTING TO THE BLUNDER
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 74
Thread images: 12
File: ggnore.png (176 KB, 746x377) Image search: [Google]
ggnore.png
176 KB, 746x377
IT'S OVER

INNARITU AND LEO CONTRIBUTING TO THE BLUNDER OF THE CENTURY
>>
GET TO THE BOAT
>>
File: 1423957734770.gif (2 MB, 237x304) Image search: [Google]
1423957734770.gif
2 MB, 237x304
>le things are only good if everyone likes it meme
>>
>>63379528
>le
>meme
>gay pic related
>greentext

Try again without the Internet's dick in your ass.
>>
>>63379470
>34 fresh to 6 negative

This movie is going to kick ass?
>>
>>63379470
Just like Birdman, it will be utter shit loved by the reddit crowd
>>
>>63379901
>not even an average rating of 8/10

nope
>>
>>63379932
bold observation did you come up with that incredibly original thought all by yourself
>>
>>63379470

>Coming January 8

Too long.

Want to Hardy post now.
>>
HOW ANGRY IS LEO ON THIS ONE
>>
File: 12 years.png (205 KB, 744x320) Image search: [Google]
12 years.png
205 KB, 744x320
Hey guys did you know Boyhood took 12 years to make.
>>
>>63379932

So basically, the much more relevant audience will have a positive reaction, while your self-hating, hairy, cellulite-riddled ass will shitpost about it on /tv/?
>>
File: image.jpg (17 KB, 250x241) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
17 KB, 250x241
>>63379949
>7.9
>>
>>63379968
no, my dog told me to type it just now but hes more of a film buff than I am
>>
>>63380032
Men don't have cellulite, roastie.
>>
>>63380032
go back to the much more relevant audience website then buddy
shakemyhead
>>
>>63380102
>roastie

This is a terrible meme. Curb your autism.

>Men don't have cellulite

Right. Keep believing that's just unlucky genetics.

http://www.medicinenet.com/cellulitis/page2.htm

>Cellulitis is fairly common and affects people of all races and ages. Men and women appear to be equally affected.
>>
>BLUNDER OF THE CENTURY

/v/ will never, ever leave, will they?
>>
>>63380125

Nah, I like using both. Reddit for lurking (let's face, anything newsworthy posted here is posted there first); /tv/ for shitposting and genuine discussion (depending on the type of responses I get).
>>
>>63380017
That critic consensus will always make me laugh. You could replace "Boyhood" with any movie title and it would still be more accurate.
>>
>>63380179

>Epic in technical scale but breathlessly intimate in narrative scope, Problem Child 2 is a sprawling investigation of the human condition.

I hope this becomes a new pasta. Replace "Problem Child" with anything.
>>
is there an even more inauthentic director than inarritu? villeneuve comes to mind but inarritu takes the fucking cake
>>
>>63380032
Upboated sir!
>>
>>63380156
>/tv/ for genuine discussion
how's that going?
>>
>>63380239

HOL UP

How is Villeneuve inauthentic?
>>
>>63379470
some people just don't like his style. his best film is at 80%/7.5
>>
>>63379470
It's too gorey and brutal for a lot of people.
>>
>>63379470
>implying

Keep trying, OP.
>>
>>63380239
>inauthentic
my second fav meme critique, right after "pretentious"
>>
>>63380239
Babel and Bitufiul were pretty good but Birdman and his behavior during its release revealed he was a genuine asshat. I will never understand why so many people adore that movie. It's the dictionary definition of Oscar bait.
>>
>>63380249

You find a diamond in the rough once in a while. It's nice being able to have a productive yet transient exchange of ideas without voting, names, labels, or other technical specificities getting in the way.

The last thread I got a lot out of was a "No Country for Old Men" thread a few days back.
>>
>>63380208
>Epic in technical scale but breathlessly intimate in narrative scope, Star Wars: Episode III Revenge of the Sith is a sprawling investigation of the human condition.
>>
>>63380208
>>63380179

>Epic in technical scale but breathlessly intimate in narrative scope, the plane scene from The Dark Knight rises is a sprawling investigation of the human condition.
>>
File: 1421874329120.jpg (22 KB, 500x536) Image search: [Google]
1421874329120.jpg
22 KB, 500x536
>>63380017
>>63380208
>>63380317
>Epic in technical scale but breathlessly intimate in narrative scope, The Dark Knight Rises is a sprawling investigation of the human condition.
>>
>>63379470
what is the deal with screeners not leaking this oscar season?


is there some new protocol?
Usually every movie comes out in watchable quality this time of the year...
>>
>>63380255
Prisoners is THE example of inauthentic sensibility cinema. It doesn't get more juvenile "film buff" than this movie. Everything from the casting, to the themes, to the cinematography. It physically pains me to even think about it. Fincher was always the epitome of IMDB to me until this movie, but then Villenvue managed to topple him. He has no style and never had anything remotely interesting to say. I don't get him. He's just another polished post-fincher gritty popcorn director.
>>
>>63380357
>>63380373
I fucking hate this place
>>
>>63380378
apart from last year when they only got leaked towards end of month
>>
>>63380405
>Everything from the casting, to the themes, to the cinematography.

Can you provide examples of how each of these aspects is inauthentic in presentation?

>He has no style and never had anything remotely interesting to say.

He clearly has a style. A more accurate claim would be, "I dislike his style."

Finding interest in his work is totally subjective, though, so fair enough.

>He's just another polished post-fincher gritty popcorn director.

>polished

So you do admit he's technically proficient?

>post-fincher

This seems rather arbitrary. Why not post-Kariostami? Or post-Romm?

>popcorn director

If this were true, why don't his movies make as much money as other pure popcorn flicks, i.e. MCU universe, Transformers series, Bond series, etc.?
>>
I like how it's literally impossible to discuss a well-reviewed film on /tv/

edit: thanks for the gold!
>>
>>63380571
how did you figure out how to edit your post?

edit: doesn't matter
>>
File: J.J._Abrams_by_David_Shankbone.jpg (531 KB, 1878x2345) Image search: [Google]
J.J._Abrams_by_David_Shankbone.jpg
531 KB, 1878x2345
>>63380239
>>
It went way over budget and cost $135 million to make(not including advertisement).

Will it be a box office flop?
>>
>>63380691

No way. All of my normie friends who have seen the trailer are hyped for this. The only other movie they care about is Star Wars, so do the math.
>>
>>63380691
theres a reason they got the meme-ist actor going and its not for his acting. He can pull in money no problem
>>
>all these keks thinking it won't go back up to mid 90s once it comes out

The autism is strong in this thread
>>
>>63380773
>26 days to 2016
>still trying to use the word "cùck"

Get with the times, gramps.
>>
>>63380691
>cost $135 million to make
What? How did it cost the same as Ant-Man or The Martian?
>>
File: Boss Spider.jpg (71 KB, 750x600) Image search: [Google]
Boss Spider.jpg
71 KB, 750x600
>>63380276
perfect...
>>
File: 1436233562431.jpg (22 KB, 306x320) Image search: [Google]
1436233562431.jpg
22 KB, 306x320
>>63379470
>Trusting a mexican to write a movie about westward expansion of the United States
>>
>>63380853

It's an adaptation of a book i thought?
>>
Is this the one where Leo gets raped by a bear?
>>
>>63381119
thats right.

RIP
>>
>>63381119
It's the one where that was rumored but it is not true.
>>
File: plwb.png (107 KB, 930x1400) Image search: [Google]
plwb.png
107 KB, 930x1400
>>63380373
>>Epic in technical scale but breathlessly intimate in narrative scope, Poor Little White Boy is a sprawling investigation of the human condition.
>>
>>63380032
Most audiences will hate it. Great film but it lacked a lot of substance so shots like his wife floating above Leo on the ground will be 2deep4them
>>
>>63380017

I hate modern cinema
>>
File: 1423534263816.jpg (62 KB, 720x384) Image search: [Google]
1423534263816.jpg
62 KB, 720x384
>>63380290
>movie that criticizes theater and film industry is Oscarbait
>>
>>63380409
Then leave faggot
>>
Fuck I thought this film and the Hateful Eight were coming out on Christmas day. But apparently the film doesn't get a worldwide release until Jan 8, the fuck. I was hoping to have spent Christmas watching two westerns back to back, but it looks like I'll only be shitposting on /tv/ instead.
>>
>>63381149

is that the Criterion cover?
>>
>>63381264
>whole thing is about how an old white guy gets shit on by everyone despite being a genius
>superheroes r dumb
>i'm making shit that actually matters
>mass audiences are stupid and don't care about the quality of blockbusters
>>
So, did he fuck the bear?
>>
>>63381425
How is that Oscar bait in any way?
>Films seen as Oscar bait often have distinct characteristics. Lavishly produced epic length period dramas, often set against tragic historical events such as the Holocaust, are frequently seen this way and often contend for the technical Oscars such as cinematography, makeup and hairstyling, costume design or production design.[6] Alternatively, if set in the present, the plot may center around a character with a physical or mental disability. The cast may well include actors with previous awards or nominations, a trait that may also be shared by the director or writer.
>>
>85
>Bad
God damn I hate you people
>>
>>63381482

YOU PEOPLE?!?!
>>
>>63381482
>implying it won't lose points uno farto at a time

initial reviews are always the peak for RT scores
>>
>>63381368
Hateful 8 doesnt get a wide release until Jan 8th either.
>>
>>63379932
Hello Reddit.
>>
>>63381445
It isn't. Only literal retards think it's Oscar bait.
>>
>>63381482
>7.9/10
>good
>>
File: granny.jpg (71 KB, 720x404) Image search: [Google]
granny.jpg
71 KB, 720x404
>>63380357
>Epic in technical scale but breathlessly intimate in narrative scope, Gushing Grannies is a sprawling investigation of the human condition.
>>
>>63379470
>85%
>7.9 average rating
>Blunder

I want /v/ to leave
>>
>>63380239
>>63380255
>>63380405
>>63380534

BTFO
T
F
O
Thread replies: 74
Thread images: 12

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.