>>63331276
>The mediocre
What is subjectivity?

>mediocre
it was actually bretty good .. sequel could be interesting if they don't fuck it up, which im sure they will

>>63331276
Will they kill Dennis again?

>>63331292
>>63331293
It was shit.

Get the fuck over it.

Thought it was pretty overrated for all the hype it was getting for a horror movie but it has some really good moments like the record player scene

>>63331370
take it easy, friend

>>63331370
It certainly wasn't shit though. If you can't identify a shit movie you're a fucking pleb.

I didn't like it, doesn't mean it is shit though.

>>63331718
It's shit because I said so.

>>63331737
Why?

It's a solid 6/10. Get over it.

>have a gun
>shoot your friend in the face
>get killed
fucking retards
the gun going bang spooped me though

>>63331276

I've had a vague want to see this again, and OP gave me my reason.

I did enjoy my theatrical screening-only time I've seen it. Got that one country song out of it, and I liked the quiet, stark retro-fit. The first big "ah-ha" took me by surprise actually - I'm just now remembering the air sucking out of the room when it was there.

I'm a shill for all anybody cares, but I honestly can't remember how that shot was constructed-now I want to look it up. Ebert hated it, but I thought it got at least one positive review.

Even the people I saw it with shrugged it off, but it left an impression on me.

>>63331276
>mediocre

It was hella scary you bitch.

Only horror movie to have genuine horror in the last 15 years tbqh

great movie. sequel should be good. nice find op

>>63331276
It was actually really well done for the type of movie it was. A lot of suspense and not necessarily generically written