Whenever I read an article about Angelina Jolie it mentions her as a "glamorous, beautiful movie star." Are they all being polite at this point?
At what point does the descriptor become "movie star and hit or miss director."
Not as funny as the ones that call her a "director"
Glamorous is just a word for old
No hot girl is ever called "glamorous"
>>63329044
true dat ma nig
>>63328666
She looks like Voldemort to be rather honest, relatives.
She needs to plump up a bit. Been too skinny for a while now. Connelly too. The piss diet is working too well.
>tfw angelina looks like this
>tfw jennifer aniston still has it
poor brad
>>63329111
trips confirms brad dun goofed
>>63328666
Its PC to call a woman beautiful, stunning, glamorous etc no matter what.
>>63328666
Thought it was Jenner at first glance desu
>>63328666
It is an honorific title the press give to her because she removed her tits.
>>63328666
Because that's what their audience want; stories about "glamorous and beautiful movie stars". The """""""journalists""""""""" have to continuously fill their prose with attractive verbs and adjectives, otherwise the reader is in danger of thinking and perhaps coming up with their own.
>>63330288
That's compliment raping tbqh.
i would still fuck her to be honest family
![rs_634x1024-150125171543-634.jennifer-aniston-sags.l.12515[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wVTgSqM.jpg "rs_634x1024-150125171543-634.jennifer-aniston-sags.l.12515[1].jpg")
>>63329111
still 8/10
