Is Marvel capable of making compelling antagonists?
>>63306382
>Kingpin (THANK YOU WESLEY)
>Purple Man
>Pierce
sure
>>63306382
Clearly you've never made an omelette.
I glanced at that pic and for a moment thought his cheeks were his eyes.
>>63306382
Willem Da-goblin
Doc Ock
Sand man (even if spider man 3 was bloated)
Tony Stark aka Iron Man
>Loki
>Alexander Pierce
>Kingpin
>Purple Man
Yes.
>>63306556
>Loki
Man, a Kid Loki Netflix show would be godtier.
>>63306556
only kingpin and purple man were cool
the rest sucks desu senpai
>>63306382
>no Dr. Doom
Onscreen he's been awfully done, but in the Comic world he's beyond legendary.
>>63306382
Green Goblin
Just wait till Zemo in Civi...
>>63306382
Considering none exist in their universe, no.
>>63306556
>Loki
>good
he could've been if they didn't turn him into a pathetic kek who's the butt of every ebin joke
Ultron was well written. His plan was solid and his dialogue was great. He just sucked ass at fighting.
>>63306382
Loki
Fisk/Kingpin
Killgrave
Agent Ward
Obadiah Stane from IM1 was underrated, too
>>63306382
they'd be better with more obviously muslim elements
>>63306405
>Purple man (COME HERE JESSICA)
Red Skull was GOAT too
>>63308929
Hi, Debbie Schlussel
Welcome to 4chan
All DC movie villains not named the Joker have been shit or meh.
>>63306676
>takes off his mask in front of Kilgrave
>Word powers have no effect
>"Who deserves to rule?"
Fuck, how do we not know how to make a good on-screen Doom?
