The biggest complaint about Man of Steel was the tone. Given that this seems to have a much lighter one, do you think critics will warm up to it?
What do you predict on Rotten Tomatoes?
86% tops
>>63271443
Yup, I'd say 60% bottom too.
This is playing it pretty safe, it seems.
>>63271425
Probably like 40-55%.
I really hope this is the beginning of the death of capeshit
Won't go higher than 30%
>>63271526
>>63271531
>Affleck and Terrio working on a movie that gets scored Rotten
Affleck threatened to walk off if he didn't get his way. This movie is safe.
>>63271425
92% and a couple oscar nominations for score and screenplay
>>63271425
looks like the power rangers
70%
>>63271662
this
marveldrones won't know what hits
Is batman holding a gun or some kind of horse dildo?
>Man of steel was going for the muh gritty realism
>have a cartoon looking shitty monster thing jumping off from a building and roaring into the camera.
>muh reddit tomato meter
This is THE movie to watch stoned out of your mind in 2016.
>>63271964
This.
>>63271425
>much lighter
Having literally two jokes doesn't mean anything
Man of Steel had zero jokes because David Goyer was a retard. Snyder still put in visual jokes here and there.
Honestly I'll be shocked if it goes 70 or higher. Pretty sure none of Snyder's movies have escaped the dreaded 60 range.
>>63271425
All critics: 60-65%
Top critics: 45-55%
>>63271662
Dont forget Costume Design for Wilkinson
32%
>Bloated and self-indulgent, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice attempts to circumvent the shortcomings of Man of Steel but ultimately succumbs to most, if not all, of the same pitfalls.
>>63272066
>. Pretty sure none of Snyder's movies have escaped the dreaded 60 range
Dawn of the Dead, don't even have to look it up because it was a huge deal when it came out.
>>63272290
That had more to do with James Gunn than it did Snyder.
>anyone even implying that this'll hit more than 60%
Did we watch the same trailer?
A hairy psycho-fangirl of a Lex Luthor?
An out of no-where ass-pulled wonder woman?
It doesn't even set the to open setting up for 'outside' supers to show up.
I don't think the batfleck looks too terrible - and the whole "everyone worships the jesus superman and hates on the vigilante who's branding criminals he catch" looks like an acceptable source of conflict... but terrible can be a relative thing - you can only polish a superman-turd that much
>>63272290
it wasn't actually a good movie, it's just that there were no expectations so it being tolerable was a pleasant surprise.
>>63272489
>I don't think the batfleck looks too terrible
He sounds fucking retarded though. First time I heard his voiceover I thought it was Doomsday talking.
>>63272601
We'll see - I honestly have no clue what direction the batfleck is going here.
I mean, branding people? Wut?
Or in that final shot he's holding a gun. Batman. Holding. A. Gun.
I think batfleck's voice (no doubt honed from a lot of dick) is the least of his problems
>>63272981
>Or in that final shot he's holding a gun. Batman. Holding. A. Gun.
Yeah, never seen that before.
>>63273117
thats a flashlight, dumbass
>>63273117
that looks like a tech gadget, the gun in the trailer looks exactly like a tacticool assault rifle
>>63272981
Youve probably never read a Batman comic in your life
>>63271425
It was a terrible tone for the character.
This looks like a terrible tone for this flick.
Doesn't help when the acting is so poor.
>>63273129
It's an emp grenade launcher, actually. He wasn't shutting down cars with a flashlight in the movie, idiot.
>>63271425
The casting of lex is going to kill this movie, mark my words
I thought DC was trying to distance themselves by taking a different approach than Marvel.
Now we have Batman quipping and Lex "absolute madman" Luthor.
>>63273154
You're an idiot. If you watched the trailer you'd see that it's a grappling hook.
>>63272011
>Zod uses an I-Beam
>Supes uses an eye beam.
Tee hee.
>>63271425
Film is a visual medium. Tone is obviously expressed through the writing, but it has to correlate to the way the film is shot. And it's shot the same way as Man of Steel: dark, grimy, but now with shit humor that doesn't even match the way the film looks.
>>63273154
It looks nothing like a "tacticool" assault rifle.
>>63273154
This
His grapling guns have always been one-handed sidearm sized things - hell, we see him use that in the trailer with just one hand.
What he's holding in the end looks like a fancy ray-gun or something
oh well - if nothing else it'll be ok popcorn-fodder
>>63273434
>fancy ray gun
Literally what the fuck are you talking about
I think it looks great, but then again Batman is the only capeshit character I care about
