Why does Red Epic's image look so disgusting? It's as if they wanted to prove Tarantino right
>>63257815
Do you have any examples of this?
Literally reddit, the camera
>>63257898
Pls stop this meme already.
>>63257815
explain
>>63257815
Who cares about a 5k piece of shit? Get an 8k instead.
>>63257815
shill much?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvp97SMZc6M
https://youtu.be/xVAv0Xx6Un8
>>63258002
>
What a disgusting design logo "weapons of digital cinema"
It's not a nerf gun you advertise for christ sake.
>>63258035
>RAW footage vs. film
it's almost if digital requires post-processing
>>63257960
Back to reddit le narwhal
>>63258035
>1080p
Why even compare when you have it on a shit resolution. It isn't even 4k or 8k in the youtube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLprVF6d7Ug
>>63258035
were these guys inspired by Tommy Wiseau?
>>63258097
Who cares what it looks like? The handle could be a big fat black dildo for all I care.
>>63257815
because RED is shit tier
use a proper camera maker instead
Fincher uses red and i think his use of digital is best in the industry right now talking about imagery aesthetics
>>63258220
>ARRI Alexa 65 6560 x 3100 ARRIRAW @24fps
>6560 x 3100
>24fps
If it isn't 8k and 60fps you need to go home, kid.
>>63258035
this is almost as bad as those tv-shop ads where the "bad" piece of the video shows how terrible it is without the product they're selling so they slap some desaturation filter on it to make it seem even more miserable.
slap some damn contrast on it or decrease the brightness.
>>63258220
Red seems way more modular.
All you need to sell now is a cube box with a god-tier digital sensor. And sell accessoiries to handle properly this black cube, that's all.
>>63258254
Say that to my face fucker not online and see what happens
>>63258200
you wouldn't care would you? in fact I think you would be quite content if you were given the chance to grab hold of a big black phallus, you mega gay.
>>63257815
The Ursa is clearly the superior camera.
>>63258408
Why is that what you are focusing on? Why would it be gay? Dicks are not gay, anon.
>>63258220
this is a safe for work board, kid
What's going on here ?
>>63258412
>12-stops DR
>fixed-pattern noise
Get the fuck out
>>63258171
Holy shit youtube does 8k?
>>63258254
Fincher has been the only one to make Red look good, with having enormous lighting and post budgets, shooting through mountains of haze just to make it work
>>63258695
yus it is fucking amazing
>>63258171
Fuck the police.
>>63258801
God damn it anon.
>>63258793
How would you know ? The best consumer monitor around is 5k.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TCGG0eVdM4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChOhcHD8fBA
>>63258837
You can zoom in using MPC-HC on any part of the screen and keep zooming in and it is zuper crisp and clear.
Oh and there are,
https://www.google.com/search?q=8k+monitor
>>63258035
wow thats great literally cant tell the difference
>sent from my mobile phone
>>63258338
>>63258171
>>63258896
You guys know most movie theatres only have 2K projectors right? Even the digital imax. You're basically watching movies in 1080p.
>>63258896
Ok. Because I had 5k monitor at work (around 2005) but their response time was fucking horrible and costing 30k each for a 22". It was medical stuff.
>>63258220
based German engineering
>>63259069
nope. Movie theatres also have 4K projectors.
are people pretending to notice 4k and 8k?
How the fuck can cinemas be at 2k on a screen that big and people are gushing over 4k on their monitors and 40 inch TV's?
>>63258220
That's just the more expansive one but very few people use this brand no ? What's the mount ?
>>63259069
>movie theatres
Those still exist?
>>63259106
I had a 4k monitor back when they didn't call it 4k for my old gaming system. But it was a shitty brand and it died like 3 times while under warranty. I went back to 3 1920x1200 monitors. All died Now I'm down to some shitty LCD Dell at 1280x1024 that is already showing signs of dying. Meanwhile my ancient gateway CRTs are still as strong as ever.
It hurts to live. Why can't this new shit be as tank-like as the old CRTs?
>>63259273
4k is a big difference with a good uncompressed source. Above... I'm not sure or we are taking about 100inch screen. My eyes cannot follow more.
>>63259236
Yeah but most don't, and the majority of movies in the last decade were mastered and edited in 2K.
>>63259300
>but very few people use this brand no
Alexia is the standard actually, RED is the new kid in town. RED wishes they had the TV industry which is all Alexia now.
>>63259447
>Alexia is the standard
Meant ARRI
>>63259300
ARRI and Panavision used to dominate the film camera market back in the days.
ARRI now develops digital cameras while Panavision still mainly focuses on 35mm and 70mm film. RED is a new company that exclusively makes digital cameras.
>>63259826
Ok I didn't know
With the power of consumer processors, paralles computing, 100megapix sensors exisiting in the world of photography (hasseblad for exemple), they could do so much more for the theatrical release and their quality.
These pro digital cameras just looks like normal DSLR with some fancy things on it.
>>63259950
>100megapix sensors
There's a common misconception that number of pixels = image quality, but that's just not really true. My phone has 16 fucking megapixels and the pictures look like garbage. Meanwhile 4K is technically only 8 megapixels, and 1080p is like 2. In digital cinema cameras there's a lot more that goes into quality like dynamic range, how well it handles low light, and so on.
>>63260256
Because you have a tiny sensor ou tour phone
Hass is big. Bigger than 35mm, it could cause aa problem.
It looks shit because shitty filmmakers can get their hands on it, which is essentially all the footage you find.
>>63261359
this is why film always will be superior
it's expensive as fuck, it takes skill, it takes guts so hacks will stay away and keep shooting their features on glorified iphones
