>Men in Black 4 to feature a female lead
epic
simply epic
http://filmjunk.com/2015/11/26/men-in-black-4-to-feature-a-female-lead/
>>63235852
Pretty soon they're going to realize that female leads in movies like this dont sell
Linda Fiorentino should've been the lead in MIB 2
>>63235852
>watching any men in black movie past 1
I hope it crashes and burns anyway. This female lead crammed in shit needs to stop.
>>63235852
What if it's Elizabeth Moss?
>>63235852
OH NO WOMEN I'M SCARED MOMMYY I POO POOED IN MY UNDEROOS! THERES A BIG SCURY WOMEN IN MY MOVIE ABLOO BLOO BLOO :(
But then it's not men in black
>Men in Black
>Female lead
kek .. well played Hollywood, well played
>yfw it bombs
>>63235852
No K? No J? Fuck that, and fuck Sony.
>>63235852
>>63235895
I really don't understand why they didn't give her character a role in the sequel. I mean, did Linda Fiorentino not want to return? It's not like she's a bad actress, she pretty good. I mean, her character was in the damn animated series, but not in the movie sequel?
I got no problem with it as long as she is not Will Smith's buddy.
>>63235968
>The Woman in Black
>male lead
Fucking LOL!
>>63235995
I just realize I said "I mean" twice. Oh god, I'm turning black.
>female lead
>black side kick
it was written
so it shall be
>>63236022
nice try pal
>>63235852
I don't have a problem with this, but honestly, this franchise is long dead. No one is interested anymore. The first was a classic. The second was meh, good if you were particularly fond of the first. The third was a complete abomination and bombed hard. This will just be another, "what else can we shoehorn a female lead into" flick.
>>63235987
Why continue focusing on J & K? What else is there to do with those characters?
>Gender-Neutral Persons In Black
Allow it
>>63236063
jesus fucking christ delete this Im going to throw up
>>63236063
ugh fucking gross wtf dejlete this
>men in black
>men
>starring women
>>63236063
baka desu senpai
crossing the line
>>63236063
MODS MODS!
I mean it always seemed like a weird choice that the chick from MiB doesn't appear in the sequel. Just a throwaway line about how she quit.
Seems even weirder to just do a new sequel with a NEW female.
Does anyone actually find themselves agreeing with feminist theory and just not execution?
>>63236063
MODS
Can't wait for Ghostbusters to succeed in every way imaginable so that more of these flicks are greenlit
The first trailer might be dropping with Deadpool/Zoolander 2
Watch /tv/ implode!
>>63236063
Even /b/ is being archived today, mong.
>>63236111
No. I'm all for feminist execution.
>>63236134
>>63236113
>>63236102
>>63236094
>>63236090
>>63236089
WHAT THE FUCK WAS IT?
WAS IT CP? GURO CP? SCAT CP?
I'm not mad because there's a woman in the movie.
I'm mad because "LOOK GUYS WOMAN IN THE MOVIE AREN'T WE PROGRESSIVE" tells me they're just going to make a shit movie and sell it to me under the guise of a Men in Black movie.
Same thing with the fucking ghostbusters.
>>63236169I know its you who posted it samefagging
>>>63236134
>>>63236113
>>>63236102
>>>63236094
>>>63236090
>>>63236089
Shut the fuck up, reddit
>>63236169
Something much worse than all of that...
brb washing my eyes and wiping my hard drive
>Implying it won't be Melissa McCarthy
America loves her, for some unknown reason
>>63236186
...mods?
>>63236175
What if they're good? What if they're even better than the originals?
>>63236169
just in case you arent samefag trying too hard, use archive
>>63235852
Box office bomb incoming.
They may Ghostbuster it and get Will and Tommy back as cameos to try and make people see it.
>>63236219
If they were so fucking good, they wouldn't be using progressiveness as a selling point.
>>63235852
It'll be cancelled once all girl Ghostbusters bombs.
>>63236169
I'm guessing it was a pic saying 'reply to this pic like its something disgusting and I'll delete it to confuse newfags' in an attempt to derail the thread
>>63235995
Because they got scared, that's why they spend like 30 minutes undoing the first movie, because they wanted to just redo it instead of doing something new.
They're going to remake every popular male-led movie and gender-/race-swap the main character, aren't they?
>>63236324
Cant wait for female platoon.
>>63236175
>>63236175
This, i'm all for a female lead myself, i'm currently marathoning Alias and loving it(kinda want Vaughan to fuck off) but the whole shoehorning annoys me, it smacks of lack of originality, rather than come up with something themselves they just feed off others achievements.
>>63235852
Huge films studios arent exactly retarded when it comes to making money and I doubt they would throw hundreds of millions to something because of some loud internet activists. Maybe there really is a market for this despite what you bitter superwizards think. I certainly think they know a bit better than you do
Don't get me wrong it would be fucking funny if this fails spectacularly
>>63236365
>I certainly think they know a bit better than you do
Did you not see the fantastic four remake? studios can be just as retarded as your mother anon.
>>63236420
That movie flopped because behind the scenes it was a clusterfuck, not because the torch guy was black.
>>63236470
>this delusion
They lost over half their budget mid-way because the higher ups foresaw a lack of sales due to le flaming negro man.
>>63236508
Citation needed
>>63236365
Yeah, after all Sony recently produced some instant classics like Aloha, Goosebumps, Pixels, Paul Blart 2, After Earth and that Annie remake.
How could they ever be wrong?
>>63235852
I don't see the big deal. It's not like they're completely rebooting a franchise and discarding the movie universe before it. They have female agents, it's been in every movie.
Ghostbusters is worht being annoyed over, but not really this.
>>63236315
This is the reason.
>>63236538
There is none because that wasn't their wording for the reason(duh), but the producers did see a lack of sales in the future so they cut the budget massively to cut off their losses.
>>63236587
>Goosebumps
Doubled its money
>Pixels
Tripled its money
>Paul Blart 2
Almost quadrupled its money
> After Earth
Almost doubled its money
>Annie
Doubled its money
What is your point? The distributor and producer don't give a fuck about the quality, they want profit.
>>63236726
Studios only get about half of the box office. Did you guys not know that?
>>63236726
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_box_office_bombs#Estimating_loss
>>63235852
CAN WE GENOCIDE ALL WOMEN YET LMAO
THE LATEST HITMAN MOVIE WAS ALSO ABOUT SOME SLUT
I didn't know Sony owned Men in Black. I can't wait for Ghostbusters and this movie to fail.
>>63235947
>>Reddit.com
Id have rather seen the 21 jump street crossover then this gender swapping crap.
>>63236073
They're literally Men in Black
of course. white woman and black guy. its the new shit. and its going to flop.
>>63238435
Then they should just rename it black men in.
>>63235852
Well I was pissed off when the 2nd one didn't.
Then I was pissed off at how much worse it was.
Then the third one happened and now I know the first one was a fluke.
I care about the 4th MIB as much as I do the new Independence Day or Ghostbusters.
>le female lead in reboot/sequel maymay
They didn't even wait for Ghostbusters to fail. Literally a money fire.
>>63240472
>not caring about the new Independence Day
I think you might be gay
>making another MiB
fucking why? III was already a stretch, but managed to be just decent enough. Just let it die now
>>63240543
JEMAINE CLEMENT WAS AMAZING IN MIB3, COMPLETELY CARRIED THE MOVIE
BROLIN WAS OK BUT THE CHARACTER IS BORING
WILL SMITH IS WILL SMITH
>>63236150
Underrated post. But still die in a ditch because tripfag
haha. sjw stuff.
>>63240534
pic related? not related?
Either way the first one was less than mindless 90s action crap and this soft reboot won't be any better.
You just know they'll go full terminator and cram all the memorable lines in there too. I can't wait to hear, "Welcome to Earth," again.
>>63236796
And that means the only film on that list to lose money was After Earth.
Q.E.D.
that was always the silliest shot of the movie
>lets make a movie about it!
fucking hell
>>63235852
I have a soft spot for tomboyish business women.
Would fuck
when will we get representation in cinema for they/them/their pronouns. . .
>>63235947
>Waaaahh!!! Nobody wants to watch our movies!!!
>>63240652
Pic is related. Since White House Down Joey has become a favorite of Emmerich
>Making genderbent sequels to series that have been concluded already in a (relatively) satisfying way.
Just fucking stop it. If you want to make some bullshit secret agent alien movie with women go right ahead, but don't shit all over the memories people have of Men in Black
I refuse to watch any of these bullshit remakes, let alone the remakes with chicks or niggers in white male roles for the PC crowd.
>>63240828
This. I don't actively make a fuss, I just choose not to watch it. It's not even that there's niggers or women on the screen, when written with no agenda and 'true-to-life', it's fine. There's no shoehorning. You can always tell and it doesn't feel authentic.
Sicario did well in that regard, Blunt fell genuine. Supergirl doesn't
